Are oil shocks permanent or temporary? Panel data evidence from crude oil and NGL production in 60 countries

Energy Economics

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 919-936

  Narayan, Paresh Kumar ^a   Narayan, Seema ^a,b   Smyth, Russell ^c  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Crude oil; Panel unit root

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS; LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS; PRODUCTIVITY;

PANEL UNTI ROOT;

CRUDE PETROLEUM;

CRUDE OIL; GAS PRODUCTION; NATURAL GAS; OIL PRODUCTION; OIL SUPPLY; PANEL DATA;

EID: 38049081105     PISSN: 01409883     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2007.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Altinay G., and Karagol E. Structural break, unit root and the causality between energy consumption and GDP in Turkey. Energy Economics 26 (2004) 985-994
2. Atkenson A., and Kehoe P.J. Models of energy use: puffy-puffy versus puffy-clay. American Economic Review 89 (1999) 1028-1043
3. Bai J., and Perron P. Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes. Econometrica 66 (1998) 47-78
4. Breitung J. The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. In: Baltagi B.H. (Ed). Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration and dynamic panels (2000), Elsevier, Amsterdam 161-177
5. Breitung J., and Candelon B. Purchasing power parity during currency crises: a panel unit root test under structural breaks. Review of World Economics 141 (2005) 124-140
6. Caporale T., and Grier K. Political regime change and the real interest rate. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 32 (2000) 320-334
7. Chen S.-S., and Chen H.-C. Oil prices and real exchange rates. Energy Economics 29 (2007) 390-404
8. Cochrane J.H. Permanent ant transitory components of GNP and stock prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics 109 (1994) 241-266
9. Davis S.J., and Haltiwanger J. Sectoral job creation and destruction responses to oil price changes. Journal of Monetary Economics 48 (2001) 465-512
10. Finn M.G. Perfect competition and the effects of energy price increases on economic activity. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 32 (2000) 400-416
11. Fisher R.A. Statistical Methods for Research Workers. 4th edition (1932), Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh
12. Hadri K. Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data. Econometrics Journal 3 (2000) 148-161
13. Hamilton J.D. What is an oil shock?. Journal of Econometrics 113 (2003) 363-398
14. Hamilton, J.D., 2005. Oil and the macroeconomy. In: Durlauf, S., Blume, L. (Eds.) New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Palgrave-MacMillan.
15. Hendry D.F., and Juselius K. Explaining cointegration analysis, part 1. Energy Journal 21 (2000) 1-42
16. Hlouskova J., and Wagner M. The performance of panel unit and stationary tests: results from a large scale simulation study. Econometric Reviews 25 (2006) 85-116
17. Holmes M.J. Panel data evidence on inflation convergence in the European Union. Applied Economics Letters 9 (2002) 155-158
18. Hooker M.A. What happened to the oil price macroeconomy relationship?. Journal of Monetary Economics 38 (1996) 195-213
19. Hurlin, C., Mignon, V., 2004. Second generation panel unit root tests, Mimeo, University of Paris X.
20. Im K.-.S., Pesaran H., and Shin Y. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics 115 (2003) 53-74
21. Im K.S., Lee J., and Tieslau M. Panel LM unit root tests with level shifts. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 67 (2005) 393-419
22. Joyeux R., and Ripple R.D. Household energy consumption versus income and relative standard of living: a panel approach. Energy Policy 35 (2007) 50-60
23. Karlsson S., and Lothgren M. On the power and interpretation of panel unit root tests. Economics Letters 66 (2000) 249-255
24. Kilian L. The effects of exogenous oil supply shocks on output and inflation: evidence from the G7 countries. C.E.P.R. Discussion Paper vol. 5404 (2005)
25. Kilian L. Exogenous oil supply shocks: how big are they and how much do they matter for the U.S. economy?. C.E.P.R. Discussion Paper vol. 5131 (2005)
26. Kilian, L. 2007. Not all oil price shocks are alike: disentangling demand and supply shocks in the crude oil market, mimeo. Available at http://www.personal.umich.edu/~lkilian/oil3_052107.pdf
27. Kim L., and Loungani P. The role of energy in real business cycle models. Journal of Monetary Economics 29 (1992) 173-189
28. Kwiatowski D., Phillips PCB., Schmidt P., and Shin Y. Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. Journal of Econometrics 54 (1992) 91-115
29. Lardic S., and Mignon V. Oil prices and economic activity: An asymmetric cointegration approach. Energy Economics 30 (2008) 847-855
30. Lee C.C. The causality relationship between energy consumption and GDP in G-11 countries revisited. Energy Policy 34 (2006) 1086-1093
31. Lee, J., Strazicich, M.C., 2003a. Minimum LM unit root test with one structural break. Mimeo Department of Economics, Appalachian State University.
32. Lee J., and Strazicich M.C. Minimum Lagrange multiplier unit root test with two structural breaks. Review of Economics and Statistics 85 (2003) 1082-1089
33. Levin A., Lin C.-F., and Chu C.S.J. Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite sample properties. Journal of Econometrics 108 (2002) 1-24
34. Linn, J., 2006. Why do oil shocks matter? The importance of inter-industry linkages in U.S. manufacturing. Mimeo, University of Illinois at Chicago.
35. Luintel K. Heterogeneous panel unit root tests and purchasing power parity. Manchester School Supplement (2001) 42-56
36. Lumsdaine R., and Papell D. Multiple trend breaks and the unit root hypothesis. Review of Economics and Statistics 79 (1997) 212-218
37. O'Connell P. The overvaluation of purchasing power parity. Journal of International Economics 44 (1998) 1-19
38. Maddala G.S., and Wu S. A comparative study of unit roots with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 61 (1999) 631-651
39. Muellbauer J., and Nunziata L. Credit, the stock market and oil. Working paper (2001), University of Oxford June
40. Narayan P.K. Are output fluctuations transitory? New evidence from twenty four Chinese provinces. Pacific Economic Review 9 (2004) 327-336
41. Narayan P.K. New evidence on purchasing power parity from 18 OECD countries. Applied Economics 37 (2005) 1063-1071
42. Narayan P.K. Are bilateral real exchange rates stationary? Evidence from Lagrange multiplier unit root tests for India. Applied Economics 38 (2006) 63-70
43. Narayan, P.K., in press. The purchasing power parity revisited: new evidence for 16 OECD countries from panel unit root tests with structural breaks. International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money.
44. Narayan, P.K., in press. Is Asian per capita GDP panel stationary? Empirical Economics.
45. Narayan, P.K., in press. Evidence of Panel Stationarity from Chinese Provincial and Regional Income. China Economic Review.
46. Narayan, P.K., in press. Do Shocks to G7 Stock Prices Have a Permanent Effect? Evidence from Panel Unit Root Tests with Structural Change. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation.
47. Narayan P.K., and Smyth R. Structural breaks and unit roots in Australian macroeconomic time series. Pacific Economic Review 10 (2005) 421-437
48. Narayan P.K., and Smyth R. Are shocks to energy consumption permanent or temporary? Evidence from 182 countries. Energy Policy 35 (2007) 333-341
49. Nelson C., and Plosser C. Trends and random walks in macroeconomic time series. Journal of Monetary Economics 10 (1982) 139-162
50. Panagiotidis T., and Rutledge E. Oil and gas markets in the UK: evidence from a cointegrating approach. Energy Economics 29 (2007) 329-347
51. Papell D. Searching for stationarity: purchasing power parity under the current float. Journal of International Economics 43 (1997) 313-332
52. Perman R., and Stein D.I. Evidence from panel unit root and panel cointegration tests that the Environmental Kuznets Curve does not exist. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 47 (2003) 325-347
53. Perron P. The great crash, the oil price shock and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica 57 (1989) 1361-1401
54. Postali F.A.S., and Picchetti P. Geometric Brownian motion and structural breaks in oil prices: a quantitative analysis. Energy Economics 28 (2006) 506-522
55. Regnier E. Oil and energy price volatility. Energy Economics 29 (2007) 405-427
56. Rogoff, K. 2006. Oil and the global economy. Mimeo, Harvard University.
57. Rotemberg J.J., and Woodford M. Imperfect competition and the effects of energy price increases. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 28 (1996) 549-577
58. Song F., and Wu Y. Hysteresis in unemployment: evidence from 48 states. Economic Inquiry 35 (1997) 235-244
59. 2 emission levels converging among industrial countries?. Environmental and Resource Economics 24 (2003) 263-271
60. Tauchmann H. Firing the furnace? An econometric analysis of utilities' fuel choice. Energy Policy 34 (2006) 3898-3909
61. Zivot E., and Andrews D. Further evidence of the great crash, the oil-price shock and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10 (1992) 251-270