Reuse mechanisms in situational method engineering

IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

Volumn 244, Issue , 2007, Pages 79-93

  Becker, Jörg ^a   Janiesch, Christian ^a   Pfeiffer, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESIGN SITUATIONS; METHOD ENGINEERING; REUSE MECHANISM; SITUATIONAL METHOD ENGINEERING;

REUSABILITY;

ENGINEERING;

EID: 38049061225     PISSN: 15715736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-73947-2_8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (58)

1. F.P. Brooks, Essence and Accidents of Software Engineering, IEEE Computer 20(4), 10-19 (1987).
2. M. Lindvall and I. Rus, Process Diversity in Software Development, IEEE Software 17(4), 14-18 (2000).
3. K. Kautz, The Enactment of Methodology: The Case of Developing a Multimedia Information System, in: Proc. 25th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2004) (Washington, D.C., 2004), pp. 671-683.
4. B. Fitzgerald, N.L. Russo, and T. O'Kane, Software Development: Method Tailoring at Motorola, Communications of the ACM 46 (4), 65-70 (2003).
5. K. Wistrand and F. Karlsson, Method Components - Rationale Revealed, in: Proc. 16th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2004) (Riga, 2004), pp. 189-201.
6. A.H.M. ter Hofstede and T.F. Verhoef, On the Feasibility of Situational Method Engineering, Information Systems 22(6/7), 401-422 (1997).
7. S. Kelly, M. Rossi, and J.-P. Tolvanen, What is Needed in a MetaCASE Environment?, Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures 1(1), 25-35 (2005).
8. J. Luoma, S. Kelly, and J.-P. Tolvanen, Defining Domain-Specific Modeling Languages - Collected Experiences, in: Proc. 4th Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications Workshop on Domain-Specific Modeling (OOPSLA 2004) (Vancouver, 2004).
9. K. Kumar and R.J. Welke, Methodology Engineering: A Proposal for Situation-specific Methodology Construction, in: Challenges and Strategies for Research in Systems Development, edited by W. W. Cottermann and J. A. Senn (John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, 1992), pp. 257-269.
10. S. Brinkkemper, Method Engineering - Engineering of Information Systems Development Methods and Tools, Information and Software Technology 38(4), 275-280 (1996).
11. A.F. Harmsen, Situational Method Engineering (Twente, Utrecht, 1997).
12. K. Wimmer and N. Wimmer, Conceptual modeling based on ontological principles, Knowledge Acquisition 4(4), 387-406 (1992).
13. C. Alexander, A Pattern Language: Towns. Buildings. Constructions (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1977).
14. M. Fowler, Analysis Patterns: Reusable Object Models (Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, 1996).
15. E. Gamma, R. Helm, R. Johnson, and J. Vlissides, Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 2005).
16. D. Gupta and N. Prakash, Engineering Methods from Method Requirements Specifications, Requirements Engineering 6(3),135-160 (2001).
17. C. Szyperski, D. Gruntz, and S. Murer, Component Software: Beyond Object-Oriented Programming (Addison-Wesley, London, 2003).
18. J. Becker, L. Algermissen, T. Falk, D. Pfeiffer, and P. Fuchs, Model Based Identification and Measurement of Reorganization Potential in Public Administrations - the PICTURE-Approach, in: Proc. 10th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS) (Kuala Lumpur, 2006), pp. 860-875.
19. P. Slater, Output from generic packages, ACM SIGAda Ada Letters XV(3), 76-79 (1995).
20. T.C. Jones, Reusability in Programming: A Survey of the State of the Art, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 10(5), 488-493 (1984).
21. M. Rosemann and W.M.P. van der Aalst, A Configurable Reference Modelling Language, Information Systems 32(1), 1-23 (2007).
22. J. Becker, M. Kugeler, and M. Rosemann, Process Management: A Guide for the Design of Business Processes (Springer, Berlin, 2007).
23. A.-W. Scheer, Business Process Engineering: Reference Models for Industrial Enterprises (Springer, Berlin et al., 2002).
24. J. Becker and R. Schütte, Handelsinformationssysteme (Redline Wirtschaft, Frankfurt am Main, 2004).
25. J. vom Brocke, Design Principles for Reference Modelling - Reusing Information Models by Means of Aggregation, Specialisation, Instantiation, and Analogy, in: Reference Modeling for Business Systems Analysis, edited by P. Fettke and P. Loos (Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, 2007), pp. 47-75.
26. J. Becker, P. Delfmann, and R. Knackstedt, Adaptive Reference Modeling: Integrating Configurative and Generic Adaptation Techniques for Information Models, in: Proc. Reference Modeling Conference (RefMod) (Passau, 2006).
27. C. Crawford: Core Components Technical Specification - Part 8 of the ebXML Framework. Version 2.01. UN/CEFACT (2003)
28. S. Brinkkemper, M. Saeki, and F. Harmsen, Meta-modelling Based Assembly Techniques for Situational Method Engineering, Information Systems 24(3), 209-228 (1999).
29. M. Leppänen, Contextual Method Integration, in: Advances in Information System Development, edited by G. Knapp, G. Wojtkowski, J. Zupancic, and S. Wrycza (Springer, 2007).
30. J. Ralyté and C. Rolland, An Assembly Process Model for Method Engineering, in: Proc. 13th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2001). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol 2068 (Interlaken, 2001), pp. 267-283.
31. S. Brinkkemper, M. Saeki, and F. Harmsen, Assembly Techniques for Method Engineering, in: Proc. 10th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 1998). Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Pisa, 1998), pp. 381-400.
32. T. Punter and K. Lemmen, The MEMA-model: Towards a new approach for Method Engineering, Information and Software Technology 38 4), 295-300 (1996).
33. M. Saeki and K. Wenyin, Specifying Software Specification & Design Methods, in: Proc. 6th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 1994) (Utrecht, 1994).
34. J. Ralyté and C. Rolland, An Approach for Method Reengineering, in: Proc. 20th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER 2001) (Yokohama, 2001), pp. 471-484
35. X. Song, Systematic Integration of Design Methods, IEEE Software 14(2), 107-117 (1997).
36. F. Karlsson and K. Wistrand, Combining Method Engineering with Activity Theory: Theoretical Grounding of the Method Component Concept, European Journal of Information Systems 15(1), 82-90 (2006).
37. J. Ralytȩ R. Deneckère, and C. Rolland, Towards a Generic Model for Situational Method Engineering, in: Proc. 15th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2003) (Klagenfurt, 2003), pp. 95-110.
38. M. Bajec, D. Vavpotič, and M. Krisper, Practice-driven Approach for Creating Project-specific Software Development Methods, Information and Software Technology 49(4), 345-365 (2007).
39. R. Baskerville and J. Stage, Accommodating Emergent Work Practices: Ethnographic Choice of Method Fragements, in: Proc. IFIP TC8/WG8.2 Working Conference on Realigning Research and Practice in IS Development: The Social and Organisational Perspective (Boise, ID, 2001), pp. 12-28.
40. J. Becker, R. Knackstedt, D. Pfeiffer, and C. Janiesch, Configurative Method Engineering: On the Applicability of Reference Modeling Mechanisms in Method Engineering, in: Proc. 13th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2007) (Keystone, CO, 2007).
41. J. Cameron, Configurable Development Processes, Communications of the ACM 45(3), 72-77 (2002).
42. S. Greiffenberg, Methodenentwicklung in Wirtschaft und Verwaltung (Verlag Dr. Kovac, Hamburg, 2003).
43. S. Henninger, A. Ivaturi, K. Nuli, and A. Thirunavukkaras, Supporting Adaptable Methodologies to Meet Evolving Project Needs, in: Proc. Joint Conference on XP Universe and Agile Universe (Chicago, IL, 2002), pp. 33-44.
44. F. Karlsson: Method Configuration: Method and Computerized Tool Support. Linköping (2005)
45. F. Karlsson and P.J. Ågerfalk, Method Configuration: Adapting to Situational Characteristics While Creating Reusable Assets, Information and Software Technology 46(9),619-633 (2004).
46. M. Leppänen: An Ontological Framework and a Methodical Skeleton for Method Engineering: A Contextual Approach. Jyväskylä (2005)
47. B.A. Nuseibeh: A Multi-Perspective Framework for Method Integration. London (1994)
48. J. Odell, Meta-modelling, in: Proc. OOPSLA'95 Workshop on Metamodelling in OO (Austin, TX, 1995).
49. C. Patel, S. de Cesare, N. Iacovelli, and A. Merico, A Framework for Method Tailoring: A Case Study, in: Proc. 2nd OOPSLA Workshop on Method Engineering for Object-Oriented and Component-Based Development (Vancouver, 2004).
50. I. Mirbel and J. Ralyté, Situational Method Engineering: Combining Assembly-based and Roadmap-driven Approaches, Requirements Engineering 11(1), 58-78 (2006).
51. J.-P. Tolvanen: Incremental Method Engineering with Modeling Tools: Theoretical Principles and Empirical Evidence. Jyväskylä (1998)
52. M. Rossi, B. Ramesh, K. Lyytinen, and J.-P. Tolvanen, Managing Evolutionary Method Engineering by Method Rationale, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 5(9), 356-391 (2004).
53. M.A.G. van Offenbeek and P.L. Koopman, Scenarios for System Development: Matching Context and Strategy, Behaviour & Information Technology 15(4), 250-265 (1996).
54. J. Becker, C. Janiesch, S. Seidel, and C. Brelage, A Framework for Situational and Evolutionary Language Adaptation in Information Systems Development, in: Advances in Information System Development, edited by G. Knapp, G. Wojtkowski, J. Zupancic, and S. Wrycza (Springer, 2007).
55. A. Mili, S.F. Chmiel, R. Gottumukkala, and L. Zhang, An Integrated Cost Model for Software Reuse, in: Proc. 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering (Limerick, Ireland, 2000), pp. 157-166.
56. J. Becker, C. Janiesch, and D. Pfeiffer, Towards more Reuse in Conceptual Modeling: A Combined Approach using Contexts, in: Proc. 19th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2007) Forum (Trondheim 2007).
57. G. Guizzardi, L.F. Pires, and M.J.v. Sinderen, On the Role of Domain Ontologies in the Design of Domain-Specific Visual Modeling Languages, in: Proc. 17th ACM Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages and Applications (OOPSLA 2002) (Seattle, WA, 2002).
58. C. Janiesch, Implementing Views on Business Semantics: Model-based Configuration of Business Documents, in: Proc. 15th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2007) (St. Gallen, 2007).