메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 131, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 3-4

Show me the data

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PUBLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE;

EID: 38049046181     PISSN: 00221295     EISSN: 00221295     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1085/jgp.200709940     Document Type: Editorial
Times cited : (8)

References (9)
  • 1
    • 44349143283 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The number that's devouring science. The impact factor, once a simple way to rank scientific journals, has become an unyielding yardstick for hiring, tenure, and grants
    • Monastersky, R. 2005. The number that's devouring science. The impact factor, once a simple way to rank scientific journals, has become an unyielding yardstick for hiring, tenure, and grants. Chron. High. Educ. 52:A12.
    • (2005) Chron. High. Educ , vol.52
    • Monastersky, R.1
  • 2
    • 33846985958 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The returning tide: How China, the world's most populous country, is building a competitive research base
    • doi:10.1083/jcb.200701150
    • Wells, W.A. 2007. The returning tide: how China, the world's most populous country, is building a competitive research base. J. Cell Biol. 176:376-401. doi:10.1083/jcb.200701150.
    • (2007) J. Cell Biol , vol.176 , pp. 376-401
    • Wells, W.A.1
  • 3
    • 84945521173 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Cash-per-publication is an idea best avoided
    • doi:10.1038/441786a
    • Editorial. 2006. Cash-per-publication is an idea best avoided. Nature. 441:786. doi:10.1038/441786a.
    • (2006) Nature , vol.441 , pp. 786
    • Editorial1
  • 4
    • 21744446266 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Not-so-deep impact. Research assessment rests too heavily on the inflated status of the impact factor
    • doi:10.1038/4351003a
    • Editorial. 2005. Not-so-deep impact. Research assessment rests too heavily on the inflated status of the impact factor. Nature. 435:1003-1004. doi:10.1038/4351003a.
    • (2005) Nature , vol.435 , pp. 1003-1004
    • Editorial1
  • 5
    • 33745613796 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The PLoS Medicine Editors. 2006. The impact factor game. It is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature. PLoS Med. 3:e291. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291.
    • The PLoS Medicine Editors. 2006. The impact factor game. It is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature. PLoS Med. 3:e291. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291.
  • 6
    • 0033584703 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Journal impact factor: A brief review
    • Garfield, E. 1999. Journal impact factor: a brief review. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 161:979-980.
    • (1999) Can. Med. Assoc. J , vol.161 , pp. 979-980
    • Garfield, E.1
  • 7
    • 38049013828 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • accessed November 29, 2007
    • The Thomson Scientific Impact Factor. 1994. http://scientific.thomson. com/free/essays/journalcitationreports/impactfactor/ (accessed November 29, 2007).
    • The Thomson Scientific Impact Factor. 1994
  • 8
    • 35548972255 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Hwang's retracted publication still contributes to Science's impact factor
    • Liu, S.V. 2007. Hwang's retracted publication still contributes to Science's impact factor. Sci. Ethics. 2:44-45.
    • (2007) Sci. Ethics , vol.2 , pp. 44-45
    • Liu, S.V.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.