Complex events in business processes

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4439 LNCS, Issue , 2007, Pages 29-40

  Barros, Alistair ^a   Decker, Gero ^b   Grosskopf, Alexander ^a  

^a SAP Research Brisbane   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; DATA REDUCTION; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT; COMPLEX EVENT PROCESSING; FLOW ORIENTED PROCESS MODELING LANGUAGES;

ADMINISTRATIVE DATA PROCESSING;

EID: 38049039891     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-72035-5_3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. UML 2.0 Superstructure Specification. Technical report, Object Management Group (OMG), August 2005.
2. Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) Specification, Final Adopted Specification. Technical report, Object Management Group (OMG), February 2006. http://www.bpmn.org/.
3. T. Andrews, F. Curbera, H. Dholakia, Y. Goland, J. Klein, F. Leymann, K. Liu, D. Roller, D. Smith, S. Thatte, I. Trickovic, and S. Weerawarana. Business Process Execution Language for Web Services, version 1.1. Technical report, OASIS, May 2003. http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws- bpel.
4. A. Barros, G. Decker, M. Dumas, and F. Weber. Correlation Patterns in Service-Oriented Architectures. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering (FASE), Braga, Portugal, March 2007.
5. S. Chakravarthy and D. Mishra. Snoop: An expressive event specification language for active databases. Data Knowledge Engineering, 14(1):1-26, 1994.
6. D. Luckham. The Power of Events: An Introduction to Complex Event Processing in Distributed Enterprise Systems. Addison-Wesley, 2001.
7. P. R. Pietzuch, B. Shand, and J. Bacon. A Framework for Event Composition in Distributed Systems. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Middleware (MW03), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2003.
8. N. Russell, W. M. van der Aalst, A. ter Hofstede, and P. Wohed. On the Suitability of UML 2.0 Activity Diagrams for Business Process Modelling. In Proceedings 3rd Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modelling (APCCM 2006), volume 53 of CRPIT, pages 95-104, Hobart, Australia, 2006.
9. W. M. P. van der Aalst, A. H. M. ter Hofstede, B. Kiepuszewski, and A. P. Barros. Workflow Patterns. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 14(1):5-51, 2003.
10. W. v. d. van der Aalst and K. v. van Hee. Workflow Management: Models, Methods, and Systems (Cooperative Information Systems). The MIT Press, January 2002.
11. P. Wohed, W. M. van der Aalst, M. Dumas, A. ter Hofstede, and N. Russell. On the Suitability of BPMN for Business Process Modelling. In Proceedings 4th International Conference on Business Process Management (BPM 2006), LNCS, Vienna, Austria, 2006. Springer Verlag.