Mate guarding in the androdioecious clam shrimp Eulimnadia texana: Male assessment of hermaphrodite receptivity

Ethology

Volumn 114, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 64-74

  Weeks, Stephen C ^a   Benvenuto, Chiara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AKRON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANDRODIOECY; CHEMICAL CUE; CRUSTACEAN; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; HERMAPHRODITE; MATE GUARDING; MOLT;

BIVALVIA; CONCHOSTRACA; CRUSTACEA; DECAPODA (CRUSTACEA); EULIMNADIA; EULIMNADIA TEXANA;

EID: 38049034995     PISSN: 01791613     EISSN: 14390310     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2007.01446.x     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. AlonsoPimentel, H. Papaj, D. R. 1996 : Operational sex ratio versus gender density as determinants of copulation duration in the walnut fly, Rhagoletis juglandis (Diptera: Tephritidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 39, 171 180.
2. Andersson, M. B. 1994 : Sexual Selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J.
3. Borowsky, B. Borowsky, R. 1985 : Evidence that female contact pheromones influence the males reproductive behaviors in the amphipod crustacean Gammarus palustris. Am. Zool. 25, A123.
4. Borowsky, B. Borowsky, R. 1987 : The reproductive behaviors of the amphipod crustacean Gammarus palustris (Bousfield) and some insights into the nature of their stimuli. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 107, 131 144.
5. Brewer, M. C. 1998 : Mating behaviours of Daphnia pulicaria, a cyclic parthenogen: comparisons with copepods. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond.,Ser. B 353, 805 815.
6. Caskey, J. L. Bauer, R. T. 2005 : Behavioral tests for a possible contact sex pheromone in the caridean shrimp Palaemonetes pugio. J.Crust. Biol. 25, 571 576.
7. Daly, M. 1978 : The cost of mating. Am. Nat. 112, 771 774.
8. Dumont, H. J. Negrea, S. V. 2002 : Introduction to the class Branchiopoda. Backhuys, Leiden.
9. Dunham, P. J. 1978 : Sex pheromones in Crustacea. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 53, 555 583.
10. Dunham, P. J. 1986 : Mate guarding in amphipods: a role for brood pouch stimuli. Biol. Bull. 170, 526 531.
11. Dunham, P., Alexander, T. Hurshman, A. 1986 : Precopulatory mate guarding in an amphipod, Gammarus lawrencianus Bousfield. Anim. Behav. 34, 1680 1686.
12. Dunn, A. M. 1998 : The role of calceoli in mate assessment and precopula guarding in Gammarus. Anim. Behav. 56, 1471 1475.
13. Emlen, S. Oring, L. 1977 : Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197, 215 223.
14. Engqvist, L. Sauer, K. P. 2002 : Amorous scorpionflies: causes and consequences of the long pairing prelude of Panorpa cognata. Anim. Behav. 63, 667 675.
15. Grafen, A. Ridley, M. 1983 : A model of mate guarding. J. Theor. Biol. 102, 549 567.
16. Härdling, R., Jormalainen, V. Tuomi, J. 1999 : Fighting costs stabilize aggressive behavior in intersexual conflicts. Evol. Ecol. 13, 245 265.
17. Härdling, R., Kokko, H. Elwood, R. W. 2004 : Priority versus brute force: When should males begin guarding resources? Am. Nat. 163, 240 252.
18. Hartnoll, R. G. Smith, S. M. 1978 : Pair formation and the reproductive cycle in Gammarus duebeni. J. Nat. Hist. 50, 501 512.
19. Hartnoll, R. G. Smith, S. M. 1980 : An experimental study of sex discrimination and pair formation in Gammarus duebenii (Amphipoda). Crustaceana 38, 253 264.
20. Jormalainen, V. 1998 : Precopulatory mate guarding in crustaceans: male competitive strategy and intersexual conflict. Quart. Rev. Biol. 73, 275 304.
21. Jormalainen, V. Merilaita, S. 1995 : Female resistance and duration of mate-guarding in three aquatic peracarids (Crustacea). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 36, 43 48.
22. Jormalainen, V., Merilaita, S. Härdling, R. 2000 : Dynamics of intersexual conflict over precopulatory mate guarding in two populations of the isopod Idotea baltica. Anim. Behav. 60, 85 93.
23. Jormalainen, V., Merilaita, S. Riihimaki, J. 2001 : Costs of intersexual conflict in the isopod Idotea baltica. J. Evol. Biol. 14, 763 772.
24. Jormalainen, V. Shuster, S. M. 1999 : Female reproductive cycle and sexual conflict over precopulatory mate-guarding in Thermosphaeroma (Crustacea, Isopoda). Ethology 105, 233 246.
25. Jormalainen, V., Tuomi, J. Yamamura, N. 1994a : Intersexual conflict over precopula duration in mate guarding Crustacea. Behav. Processes 32, 265 283.
26. Jormalainen, V., Tuomi, J. Merilaita, S. 1994b : Effect of female resistance on size-dependent precopula duration in mate-guarding Crustacea. Anim. Behav. 47, 1471 1474.
27. Kelly, L. S. Snell, T. W. 1998 : Role of surface glycoproteins in mate-guarding of the marine harpacticoid Tigriopus japonicus. Mar. Biol. 130, 605 612.
28. Kelly, L. S., Snell, T. W. Lonsdale, D. J. 1998 : Chemical communication during mating of the harpacticoid Tigriopus japonicus. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353, 737 744.
29. Knoll, L. 1995 : Mating-behavior and time budget of an androdioecious crustacean, Eulimnadia texana (Crustacea, Conchostraca). Hydrobiologia 298, 73 81.
30. Knoll, L. Zucker, N. 1995 : Is sexual selection operating in the androdioecious clam shrimp, Eulimnadia texana (Crustacea, Conchostraca)? Hydrobiologia 298, 67 72.
31. Manning, J. T. 1975 : Male discrimination and investment in Asellus aquaticus (L.) and A. meridianus Racovitza (Crustacea: Isopoda). Behaviour 55, 1 14.
32. Medland, V. L., Zucker, N. Weeks, S. C. 2000 : Implications for the maintenance of androdioecy in the freshwater shrimp, Eulimnadia texana Packard: encounters between males and hermaphrodites are not random. Ethology 106, 839 848.
33. Olesen, J., Martin, J. W. Roessler, E. W. 1996 : External morphology of the male of Cyclestheria hislopi (Baird, 1859) (Crustacea, Branchiopoda, Spinicaudata), with a comparison of male claspers among the Conchostraca and Cladocera and its bearing on phylogeny of the 'bivalved' Branchiopoda. Zool. Scripta 25, 291 316.
34. Olsson, M. 1993 : Contest success and mate guarding in male sand lizards, Lacerta agilis. Anim. Behav. 46, 408 409.
35. Parker, G. A. 1974 : Courtship persistence and female-guarding as male time investment strategies. Behaviour 48, 157 184.
36. Parker, G. A. 1979 : Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In : Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects (Blum, M. S. Blum, N. A., eds). Academic Press, New York, pp. 123 166.
37. Prenter, J., Elwood, R. W. Montgomery, W. I. 2003 : Mate guarding, competition and variation in size in male orb- web spiders, Metellina segmentata: a field experiment. Anim. Behav. 66, 1053 1058.
38. Reynolds, J. D. 1996 : Animal breeding systems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11, A68 A72.
39. Ridley, M. 1983 : The Explanation of Organic Diversity - The Comparative Method and Adaptations for Mating. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
40. Sassaman, C. 1989 : Inbreeding and sex-ratio variation in female-biased populations of a clam shrimp, Eulimnadia texana. Bull. Mar. Sci. 45, 425 432.
41. Sassaman, C. Weeks, S. C. 1993 : The genetic mechanism of sex determination in the conchostracan shrimp Eulimnadia texana. Am. Nat. 141, 314 328.
42. Shuster, S. M. Wade, M. J. 2003 : Mating Systems and Strategies. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
43. Sparkes, T. C., Keogh, D. P. Haskins, K. E. 2000 : Female resistance and male preference in a stream-dwelling isopod: effects of female molt characteristics. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 47, 145 155.
44. Sparkes, T. C., Keogh, D. P. Orsburn, T. H. 2002 : Female resistance and mating outcomes in a stream-dwelling isopod: effects of male energy reserves and mating history. Behaviour 139, 875 895.
45. Strenth, N. E. 1977 : Successional variation of sex ratios in Eulimnadia texana Packard (Crustacea, Conchostraca). Southwest. Nat. 22, 205 212.
46. Sutcliffe, D. 1992 : Reproduction in Gammarus (Crustacea: Amphipoda): basic reproductive processes. Fresh. Forum 2, 102 128.
47. Thompson, D. J. Manning, J. T. 1981 : Mate selection by Asellus (Crustacea, Isopoda). Behaviour 78, 178 187.
48. Weeks, S. C., Benvenuto, C. Reed, S. K. 2006 : When males and hermaphrodites coexist: a review of androdioecy in animals. Integr. Comp. Biol. 46, 449 464.
49. Weeks, S. C., Hutchison, J. A. Zucker, N. 2001 : Maintenance of androdioecy in the freshwater shrimp, Eulimnadia texana: do hermaphrodites need males for complete fertilization? Evol. Ecol. 15, 205 221.
50. Weeks, S. C., Marcus, V. Alvarez, S. 1997 : Notes on the life history of the clam shrimp, Eulimnadia texana. Hydrobiologia 359, 191 197.
51. Weeks, S. C., Marquette, C. L. Latsch, E. 2004 : Barriers to outcrossing success in the primarily self fertilizing clam shrimp, Eulimnadia texana (Crustacea, Branchiopoda). Invert. Biol. 123, 146 155.
52. Weeks, S. C. Zucker, N. 1999 : Rates of inbreeding in the androdioecious clam shrimp Eulimnadia texana. Can. J. Zool. Rev. Can. Zool. 77, 1402 1408.
53. Wickler, W. Seibt, U. 1981 : Monogamy in crustacea and man. Zeitschrift Fur Tierpsychologie- J. Comp. Ethol. 57, 215 234.
54. Yamamura, N. 1987 : A model on correlation between precopulatory guarding and short receptivity to copulation. J. Theor. Biol. 127, 171 180.
55. Yamamura, N. Jormalainen, V. 1996 : Compromised strategy resolves intersexual conflict over pre-copulatory guarding duration. Evol. Ecol. 10, 661 680.
56. Zucker, N., Aguilar, G. A., Weeks, S. C. McCandless, L. G. 2002 : Impact of males on variation in the reproductive cycle in an androdioecious desert shrimp. Invert. Biol. 121, 66 72.
57. Zucker, N., Cunningham, M. Adams, H. P. 1997 : Anatomical evidence for androdioecy in the clam shrimp Eulimnadia texana. Hydrobiologia 359, 171 175.