Barriers to outcrossing success in the primarily self-fertilizing clam shrimp, Eulimnadia texana (Crustacea, Branchiopoda)

Invertebrate Biology

Volumn 123, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 146-155

  Weeks, Stephen C ^a   Marquette, Cortney L ^a   Latsch, Elizabeth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AKRON   (United States)

Author keywords

Androdioecy; Branchiopods; Mate guarding; Mating behavior

Indexed keywords

BIVALVIA; BRANCHIOPODA; CONCHOSTRACA; CRUSTACEA; DECAPODA (CRUSTACEA); EULIMNADIA; EULIMNADIA TEXANA; INVERTEBRATA;

EID: 3242736478     PISSN: 10778306     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7410.2004.tb00150.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Brendonck L 1996. Diapause, quiescence, hatching requirements: What we can learn from large freshwater branchiopods (Crustacea:Branchiopoda:Anostraca, Notostraca, Conchostraca). Hydrobiologia 320: 85-97.
2. Charlesworth D 1984. Androdioecy and the evolution of dioecy. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 22: 333-348.
3. Crosser BR 1999. Estimates of inbreeding depression in two populations of the ephemeral pond crustacean, Eulimnadia texana. The University of Akron, Akron
4. Dunham PJ & Hurshman A 1990. Precopulatory mate guarding in the amphipod, Gammarus lawrencianus - Effects of social stimulation during the post-copulation interval. Anim. Behav. 39: 976-979.
5. Eberhard WG & Cordero C 1995. Sexual selection by cryptic female choice on male seminal products - a new bridge between sexual selection and reproductive physiology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 493-496.
6. Emlen S & Oring L 1977. Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197: 215-223.
7. Hasselquist D & Bensch S 1991. Trade-off between mate guarding and mate attraction in the polygynous Great Reed Warbler. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 28: 187-193.
8. Herlihy CR & Eckert CG 2002. Genetic cost of reproductive assurance in a self-fertilizing plant. Nature 416: 320-323.
9. Jarne P & Charlesworth D 1993. The evolution of the selling rate in functionally hermaphrodite plants and animals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24: 441-466.
10. Jormalainen V & Merilaita S 1995. Female resistance and duration of mate-guarding in three aquatic peracarids (Crustacea). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 36: 43-48.
11. Jormalainen V 1998. Precopulatory mate guarding in crustaceans: Male competitive strategy and intersexual conflict. Q. Rev. Biol. 73: 275-304.
12. Jormalainen V & Shuster SM 1999. Female reproductive cycle and sexual conflict over precopulatory mate-guarding in Thermosphaeroma (Crustacea, Isopoda). Ethology 105: 233-246.
13. Knoll L 1995. Mating-behavior and time budget of an androdioecious crustacean, Eulimnadia texana (Crustacea, Conchostraca). Hydrobiologia 298: 73-81.
14. Knoll L & Zucker N 1995. Is sexual selection operating in the androdioecious clam shrimp, Eulimnadia texana (Crustacea, Conchostraca)? Hydrobiologia 298: 67-72.
15. Lande R & Schemske DW 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. 1. Genetic models. Evolution 39: 24-40.
16. Lloyd DG 1975. The maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in angiosperms. Genetica 45: 325-339.
17. Lloyd DG & Schoen DJ 1992. Self-Fertilization and Cross-Fertilization in Plants. 1. Functional Dimensions. Int. J. Plant Sci. 153: 358-369.
18. MacDiarmid AB & Butler MJ 1999. Sperm economy and limitation in spiny lobsters. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 46: 14-24.
19. Manning JT 1975. Male discrimination and investment in Asellus aquaticus (L.) and A. meridianus Racovitza (Crustacea: Isopoda). Behaviour 55: 1-14.
20. Marcus V & Weeks SC 1997. The effects of pond duration on the life history traits of an ephemeral pond crustacean, Eulimnadia texana. Hydrobiologia 359: 213-221.
21. Otto SP, Sassaman C & Feldman MW 1993. Evolution of sex determination in the conchostracan shrimp Eulimnadia texana. Am. Nat. 141: 329-337.
22. Pannell J 1997. The maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in a metapopulation. Evolution 51: 10-20.
23. Pannell JR 2000. A hypothesis for the evolution of androdioecy: the joint influence of reproductive assurance and local mate competition in a metapopulation. Evol. Ecol. 14: 195-211.
24. _ 2002. The evolution and maintenance of androdioecy. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33: 397-425.
25. Parker GA 1974. Courtship persistence and female-guarding as male time investment strategies. Behaviour 48: 157-184.
26. Richardson BJ, Baverstock PR & Adams M 1986. Allozyme electrophoresis. A handbook for animal systematics and population studies. Academic Press, New York.
27. Ridley M 1983. The Explanation of Organic Diversity: The Comparative Method and Adaptations for Mating. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
28. SAS Institute I 2003. JMP statistical software. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
29. Sassaman C & Weeks SC 1993. The genetic mechanism of sex determination in the conchostracan shrimp Eulimnadia texana. Am. Nat. 141: 314-328.
30. Scanabissi F & Mondini C 2002. A survey of the reproductive biology in Italian branchiopods. Hydrobiologia 486: 263-272.
31. Sparkes TC, Keogh DP & Orsburn TH 2002. Female resistance and mating outcomes in a stream-dwelling isopod: Effects of male energy reserves and mating history. Behaviour 139: 875-895.
32. Vidrine MF, Sissom SL & McLaughlin RE 1987. Eulimnadia texana Packard (Conchostraca, Limnadiidae) in rice fields in southwestern Louisiana. Southw. Nat. 32: 1-4.
33. Weeks SC, Marcus V & Alvarez S 1997. Notes on the life history of the clam shrimp, Eulimnadia texana. Hydrobiologia 359: 191-197.
34. Weeks SC, Marcus V & Crosser BR 1999. Inbreeding depression in a self-compatible, androdioecious crustacean, Eulimnadia texana. Evolution 53: 472-483.
35. Weeks SC & Zucker N 1999. Rates of inbreeding in the androdioecious clam shrimp Eulimnadia texana. Can. J. Zool. 77: 1402-1408.
36. Weeks SC, Crosser BR, Bennett R, Gray M & Zucker N 2000a. Maintenance of androdioecy in the freshwater shrimp, Eulimnadia texana: Estimates of inbreeding depression in two populations. Evolution 54: 878-887.
37. Weeks SC, Crosser BR, Gray MM, Matweyou JA & Zucker N 2000b. Is there sperm storage in the clam shrimp Eulimnadia texana? Invert. Biol. 119: 215-221.
38. Weeks SC, Hutchison JA & Zucker N 2001. Maintenance of androdioecy in the freshwater shrimp, Eulimnadia texana: Do hermaphrodites need males for complete fertilization? Evol. Ecol. 15: 205-221.
39. Yamamura N & Jormalainen V 1996. Compromised strategy resolves intersexual conflict over pre-copulatory guarding duration. Evol. Ecol. 10: 661-680.
40. Zaffagnini F 1969. Rudimentary hermaphroditism and automictic parthenogenesis in Limnadia lenticularis (Phyllopoda, Conchostraca). Experientia 25: 650-651.
41. Zucker N, Cunningham M & Adams HP 1997. Anatomical evidence for androdioecy in the clam shrimp Eulimnadia texana. Hydrobiologia 359: 171-175.