Migration drift

Professional Geographer

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 1-11

  Plane, David A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Directionality; Populationdistribution; U.s. migration trends

Indexed keywords

EID: 0005525204     PISSN: 00330124     EISSN: 14679272     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0033-0124.00140     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Casetti, Emilio, and John Paul Jones III. 1987. Spatial applications of the expansion method paradigm. In Quantitative Analysis in Geography, eds. Christian Dufornaud and D. Dudycha, 121-36. Waterloo, Ontario:Waterloo University Press.
2. Clark, William A. V. 1972. Some vector representations of intra-urban residential mobility. In International Geography 1972 La géographie internationale, eds. W. Peter Adams and Frederick M. Helleiner, 796-98. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Papers submitted to the 22nd International Geographical Congress, Montréal.
3. Fan, C. Cynthia. 1994. The temporal and spatial dynamics of income and population growth in Ohio, 1950-1990. Regional Studies 28: 241-58.
4. Klink, Katherine. 1998. Complementary use of scalar, directional, and vector statistics with an application to surface winds. Professional Geographer 50: 3-13.
5. McHugh, Kevin E., and Patricia Gober. 1992. Shortterm dynamics of the U.S. interstate migration system, 1980-88. Growth and Change 23: 428-45.
6. Plane, David A. 1994. The wax and wane of interstate migration patterns in the USA in the 1980s: A demographic effectiveness field perspective. Environment and Planning A 26: 1545-61.
7. Plane, David A. 1997. Gaging interstate migration streams. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Association of American Geographers, FortWorth, TX, April.
8. Plane, David A. forthcoming. Time series perspectives and physical geography analogies in migration research. In Migration and Restructuring in the United States, eds. Kavita Pandit and Suzanne Davies Withers. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
9. Plane, David A., and Gordon F. Mulligan. 1997. Measuring spatial focusing in a migration system. Demography 34: 251-62.
10. Plane, David A., and Peter A. Rogerson. 1989. US migration pattern responses to the oil glut and recession of the early 1980s: An application of shiftshare and causative-matrix techniques. In Advances in Regional Demography, eds. Peter Congdon and Peter Batey, 257-80. London: Belhaven Press.
11. Plane, David A. 1994. The Geographical Analysis of Population: With Applications to Planning and Business. New York: JohnWiley and Sons.
12. Roseman, Curtis C., and Kevin E. McHugh. 1982. Metropolitan areas as redistributors of population. Urban Geography 3: 22-33.
13. Shryock, Henry S., Jacob S. Siegel, and Associates. 1980. The Methods and Materials of Demography. Vol. 1.Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census.
14. Sonis, Michael. 1980. Locational push-pull analysis of migration streams. Geographical Analysis 12: 80-97.
15. Tarver, J. D., and D. R. McLeod. 1970. Trends in distances moved by interstate migrants. Rural Sociology 36: 563-71.
16. Tobler, Waldo. 1997. Movement modeling on the sphere. Geographical and Environmental Modelling 1: 97-103.
17. Zelinsky, Wilbur. 1971. The hypothesis of the mobility transition. The Geographical Review 61: 219-49.