The home-school interface for behaviour: A conceptual framework for co-constructing reality

Educational and Child Psychology

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 95-108

  Roffey, Sue ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 37949025006     PISSN: 02671611     EISSN: 23968702     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Advisory Centre for Education (2004). Action on exclusion. Retrieved from www.ace-ed.org.uk/ projects/updates May 2004.
2. Beresford, E. & Hardie, A. (1996). Parents and secondary schools: a different approach? In J. Bastiani, J. & S. Wolfendale (Ed.) Home school work in Britain. London: David Fulton Publishers.
3. Beveridge, S. (1997). Implementing partnerships with parents in schools. In S. Wolfendale (Ed.) Working with parents of SEN children after the code of practice. London: David Fulton Publishers.
4. Billington, T. (2000). Separating, losing and excluding children: Narratives of difference. London and New York: Routledge Falmer.
5. Bridges, D. (1987). It’s the ones who never turn up that you really want to see: The problems of the non-attending parent. In J. Bastiani (Ed.) Parents and teachers. Slough: NFER Nelson.
6. Cefai, C. (1995). Investigation of pupils, parents and teachers perceptions of behaviour problems and school-family interactions in a mainstream primary school. Unpublished M.Sc. thesis. University of Wales, Cardiff.
7. Connor, M.J. (1998). Parent/carer views on support for children with emotional and behavioural difficulties. Unpublished paper. Surrey County Council Educational Psychology Service.
8. Cooper, P. & Upton, G. (1990). An eco-systemic approach to emotional and behavioural problems in schools. Educational Psychology 10(4), 301–321.
9. Cornwell, N. (1987). Involving parents: communication between parents and professionals: Modes of listening and aspects of power. Maladjustment and Therapeutic Education, 6(3), 162–172.
10. Dale, N. (1996). Working with families of children with special educational needs: Partnership and practice. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
11. Department of Education and Science (1989). Discipline in schools Report of the committee of enquiry, chairman Lord Elton. London: The Stationery Office.
12. Department of Education and Science (2001). Special educational needs code of practice. London: The Stationery Office.
13. di Grigoria, S. (1999). Speaker at QSR NUD*IST conference, Institute of Education, London University, February 25th.
14. Dowling, E. & Gorell Barnes, G. (2000). Working with children and parents through separation and divorce. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
15. Dowling, E. & Osborne, E. (Eds.) (1994). The family and the school: A joint systems approach. London: Routledge.
16. Dowling, E. & Taylor, D. (1989). The clinic goes to school: Lessons learned. Maladjustment and Therapeutic Education 7(1), 24–28.
17. Gascoigne, E. (1995). Working with parents as partners in SEN. London: David Fulton Publishers.
18. Gray, P. (1997). Policy in a world of emotions: Where to now with EBD? In B. Norwich (Ed.) Inclusion or exclusion: Future policy for emotional and behavioural difficulties. Special educational needs policy options steering group (pp.22–37). Tamworth: NASEN.
19. Hood, S. (1999). Home-school agreements: A true partnership? School Leadership and Management, 19(4), 427–440.
20. Kral, R. (1992). Solution focused brief therapy: Applications in the schools. In M. Fine & C. Carlson (Eds.) The handbook of family-school intervention. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
21. Laws, C. (2001). Post structuralism at work with marginalised children. Unpublished PhD thesis, James Cook University.
22. Macdonald, T. & Thomas, G. (2003). Parent’s reflections on their children being excluded. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 8(2), 108–119.
23. MacLure, M. & Walker, B. (1999). Secondary school parents’ evenings. Report for the Economic and Social Research Council, UK.
24. Mallett, R. (1997). A parental perspective on partnership. In S. Wolfendale (Ed.) Working with parents of SEN children after the code of practice. London: David Fulton Publishers.
25. Miller, A. (1994). Parents and difficult behaviour; always the problem or part of the solution? In Gray, P., Miller, A. & Noakes, J. (Eds.) Challenging behaviour in schools. London: Routledge.
26. Miller, A. (1996). Pupil behaviour and teacher culture. London: Cassell.
27. Miller, A. (2003). Teachers, parents and classroom behaviour: A psychosocial approach. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
28. Miller, A., Ferguson, E. & Moore, E. (2002). Parents and pupil’s causal attributions for difficult classroom behaviour. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(1). Retrieved from http://ezproxy.uws.edu.au April 20th 2004.
29. Pianta. R.C. & Walsh, D.J. (1996). High risk children in schools: Constructing sustaining relationships. New York: Routledge.
30. Rutter, M., Tizard, J. & Whitmore, K. (1970). Education, health and behaviour. London: Longman.
31. Sammons, P., Hillman, J. & Mortimore, P. (1995). Key characteristics of effective schools. OFSTED: London University Institute of Education.
32. Todd, L. (2003). Disability and the re-structuring of welfare: The problem of partnership with parents. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 7(3), 281–296.
33. Vincent, C. (1996). Parents and teachers: power and participation. London: Falmer Press.
34. Weiss, H.M. & Edwards, M.E. (1992). The family-school collaboration project: Systemic interventions for school improvement. In Christenson, S. & Conely, J.C. (Eds.) Home-school collaboration: Enhancing children’s academic and social competence (pp.215–243). Silver Spring MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
35. Wolfendale, S. & Cook, G. (1997). Evaluation of special educational needs parent partnership schemes: DfEE Research report number 34. The Stationery Office.