Meta-analysis of short-term efficacy and safety after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer

National Medical Journal of China

Volumn 86, Issue 35, 2006, Pages 2485-2490

  Li, Jun ^a   Ding, Ke Feng ^a   Zhang, Su Zhan ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

Author keywords

Colorectal neoplasms; Data Interpretation, statistical; Laparoscopy; Randomized controlled trials

Indexed keywords

NARCOTIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLORECTAL CANCER; DATA BASE; DEFECATION; DIETARY INTAKE; FLATULENCE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MEDICAL LITERATURE; META ANALYSIS; OPERATION DURATION; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; QUALITY CONTROL; SAFETY; SCORING SYSTEM; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 37849189908     PISSN: 03762491     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1991, 1:144-150.
2. Monson JR, Darzi A, Carey PD, et al. Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy in an unselected group of patients. Lancet, 1992, 340:831-833.
3. Ah-See KW, Molony NC. A qualitative assessment of randomized controlled trials in otolaryngology. J Laryngol Otol, 1998, 112:460-463.
4. Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA, 1996, 276:637-639.
5. Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, et al. Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2005, 20:CD003145.
6. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Br J Surg, 2000, 87:1448-1454.
7. MRC CLASICC trial group. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2005, 365:1718-1726.
8. Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR). Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol, 2005, 6:477-484.
9. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med, 2004, 350:2050-2059.
10. Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, et al. Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomized trial. Lancet, 2004, 363:1187-1192.
11. Hasegawa H, Kabeshima Y, Watanabe M, et al. Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for advanced colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc, 2003, 17:636-640.
12. Zhou ZG, Hu M, Li Y, et al. Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc, 2004, 18:1211-1215.
13. Araujo SE, da Silva eSousa AH Jr, de Campos FG, et al. Conventional approach x laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer treatment after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: results of a prospective randomized trial. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo, 2003, 58:133-140.
14. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas IC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet, 2002, 359: 2224-2229.
15. Tang CL, Eu KW, Tai BC, et al. Randomized clinical trial of the effect of open versus laparoscopically assisted colectomy on systemic immunity in patients with colorectal cancer. Br J Surg, 2001, 88: 801-807.
16. Higgins JPT, Green S. Format of a Cochrane review. In: Higgins JPT, ed. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 4th ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2005. 19-35.
17. Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg, 2004, 91:1111-1124.
18. Chinese source. 2005,43,1105-1108.
19. Chinese source. 2005,13:2173-2178.
20. Joels CS, Mostafa G, Matthews BD, et al. Factors affecting intravenous analgesic requirements after colectomy. J Am Coll Surg, 2003, 197:780-785.
21. Tittel A, Schippers E, Anurov M, et al. Shorter postoperative atony after laparoscopic-assisted colonic resection? an animal study. Surg Endosc, 2001, 15:508-512.
22. Kasparek MS, Muller MH, Glatzle J, et al. Postoperative colonic motility in patients following laparoscopic-assisted and open sigmoid colectomy. J Gastrointest Surg, 2003, 7:1073-1081.
23. Delaney CP, Pokala N, Senagore AJ, et al. Is laparoscopic colectomy applicable to patients with body mass index >30? a case-matched comparative study with open colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum, 2005, 48:975-981.
24. Berends FJ, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, et al. Subcutaneous metastases after laparoscopic colectomy. Lancet, 1994, 344:58.