Information and Computer Technology in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 79-89

  Talwar, Reena M ^a   Chemaly, Daisy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; INFORMATION SCIENCE; METHODOLOGY; ORAL SURGERY; REVIEW; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTING METHODOLOGIES; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INFORMATION SCIENCE; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; SOFTWARE; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURGERY, ORAL;

EID: 37849049591     PISSN: 10423699     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.coms.2007.09.006     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. White S.C., Heslop E.W., Hollender L.G., et al., American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, ad hoc Committee on Parameters of Care. Parameters of radiologic care: an official report of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 91 5 (2001) 498-511
2. Scarfe W.C., Farman A.G., and Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computer tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc 72 1 (2006) 75-80
3. Sukovic P. Cone beam computed tomography in craniofacial imaging. Orthod Craniofac Res 6 Suppl 1 (2003) 31-36
4. Hashimoto K., Arai Y., Iwai K., et al. A comparison of a new limited cone beam computed tomography machine for dental use with a multidetector row helical CT machine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 95 (2004) 371-377
5. Ito K., Gomi Y., Sato S., et al. Clinical application of a new compact CT system to assess 3-D images for the preoperative treatment planning of implants in the posterior mandible. A case report. Clin Oral Implants Res 12 (2001) 539-542
6. Nakagawa Y., Kobayashi K., Ishii H., et al. Preoperative application of limited cone beam computerized tomography as an assessment tool before minor oral surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 32 (2002) 322-327
7. Kobayashi K., Shimoda S., Nakagawa Y., et al. Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19 (2004) 228-231
8. Ludlow J.B., Davies-Ludlow L.E., Brooks S.L., et al. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G, and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 35 (2006) 219-226 Erratum in Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35:392
9. Hirsch E., Graf H.-L., and Hemprich A. Comparative investigation of image quality of three different X-ray procedures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 32 (2003) 201-211
10. Mah J.K., Danforth R.A., Bumann A., et al. Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 96 (2003) 508-513
11. Ngan D.C., Kharbanda O.P., Geenty J.P., et al. Comparison of radiation levels from computed tomography and conventional dental radiographs. Aust Orthod J 19 (2003) 67-75
12. Sarment D.P., Sukovic P., and Clinthorne N. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18 (2003) 571-577
13. Al-Faraje L. The benefits of computer-guided implantology and Surgi-guides in treating patients with advanced alveolar bone resorption. Materialise Headlines 4 (2004) 3-5. Available at: http://www.materialise.com/materialise/view/en/473249-Materialise+Headlines.html
14. Mandelaris G.A., and Rosenfeld A.L. Is the technology trustworthy? Clinical transition from bone to tooth supported surgi-guides. Materialize Headlines 3 (2005) 2-3. http://www.materialise.com/_marketing_/HEADLINES/PDF/Headlines3_2005_EU.pdf Available at:
15. Loh S., and Yow M. Computer prediction of hard tissue profiles in orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 17 (2002) 342-347
16. Vig K.D., and Ellis E. Diagnosis and treatment planning for the surgical-orthodontic patient. Dent Clin North Am 34 (1990) 361-384
17. Csaszar G.R., Bruker-Csaszar B., and Niederdellmann H. Prediction of soft tissue profiles in orthodontic surgery with the Dentofacial Planner. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 14 (1999) 285-290
18. Seeholzer H., and Walker R. Orthodontic and oral surgical treatment planning by computer, for example, the Dentofacial Planners. Quintessenz 42 (1991) 59-67
19. Smith J.D., Thomas P., and Proffit W.R. A comparison of current prediction imaging programs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 125 (2004) 527-536
20. Ricketts R.M., Bench R., Hilgers J.J., et al. An overview of computerized cephalometrics. Am J Orthod 61 (1972) 1-28
21. Konstiantos K.A., O'Reilly M.T., and Close J. The validity of the prediction of soft tissue profile changes after Le Fort I osteotomy using Dentofacial Planner (computer software). Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 105 (1994) 241-249
22. Kolokitha O.E., Athanasiou A.E., and Tuncay O.C. Validity of computerized predictions of dentoskeletal and soft tissue profile changes after mandibular setback and maxillary impaction osteotomies. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 11 (1996) 137-154
23. Eales E.A., Newton C., Jones M.L., et al. The accuracy of computerized prediction of the soft tissue profile-a study of 25 patients treated by means of the Le Fort I osteotomy. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 9 (1994) 141-152
24. Schultes G., Gaggl A., and Karcher H. Accuracy of cephalometric and video imaging program Dentofacial Planner Plus in orthognathic surgical planning. Comput Aided Surg 3 (1998) 108-114
25. Loh S., Heng K., Ward-Booth P., et al. A radiographic analysis of computer prediction in conjunction with orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 30 (2001) 259-263
26. Aharon P.A., Eisig S., and Cisneros G.J. Surgical prediction reliability-a comparison of two computer software systems. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 12 (1997) 65-78
27. Curtis T.J., Casko J.S., Jakobsen J.R., et al. Accuracy of a computerized method of predicting soft-tissue changes from orthognathic surgery. J Clin Orthod 34 (2000) 524-530
28. Lu C.H., Ko E., and Huang C.S. The accuracy of video imaging prediction in soft tissue outcome after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61 (2003) 333-342
29. Xia J., Ip H.H.S., Samman N., et al. Computer-assisted three-dimensional surgical planning and simulation: 3D virtual osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 29 (2000) 11-17
30. Xia J., Samman N., Yeung R.W.K., et al. Three-dimensional virtual reality surgical planning and simulation workbench for orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 15 (2000) 265-282
31. Bill J.S., Reuther J.F., Dittman W., et al. Stereolithography in oral and maxillofacial operation planning. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 24 (1995) 98-103
32. D'Urso P.S., Barker T.M., Earwaker W.J., et al. Stereolithographic biomodeling in cranio-maxillofacial surgery: a prospective trial. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 27 (1999) 30-37
33. Erickson D.M., Chance D., Schmitt S., et al. An opinion survey of reported benefits from the use of stereolithographic models. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 57 (1999) 1041-1043
34. Kermer C., Rasse M., Lagogiannis G., et al. Color stereolithography for planning complex maxillofacial tumor surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 26 (1998) 360-362
35. Kragslov J., Sindet-Pedersen S., Gyldensted C., et al. A comparison of three-dimensional computed tomography scans and stereolithographic models for evaluation of craniofacial anomalies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54 (1996) 402-411
36. Sailer H.F., Haers P.E., Zollikofer C.P.E., et al. The value of stereolithographic models for preoperative diagnosis of craniofacial deformities and planning of surgical corrections. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 27 (1998) 327-333
37. Chang P.S.H., Parker T.H., Patrick C.W., et al. The accuracy of stereolithography in planning craniofacial bone replacement. J Craniofac Surg 14 (2003) 164-170
38. Arvier J.F., Barker T.M., Yau Y.Y., et al. Maxillofacial biomodeling. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 32 (1994) 276-283
39. Gateno J., Teichgraeber J.F., and Messersmith M.L. An in vitro study of the accuracy of a new protocol for planning distraction osteogenesis of the mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58 (2000) 985-990