State policy restrictions on abortion: Implications for social workers

Journal of Policy Practice

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 25-43

  Jackson, D Lynn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Abortion; Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM); Social justice

Indexed keywords

EID: 37849043696     PISSN: 15588742     EISSN: 15588750     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J508v06n04_03     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (54)

1. Adler, N.E., & Tschann, J.M. (1993). The abortion debate: Psychological issues for adult women and adolescents. In S. Matteo (Ed.), American women in the nineties: Today's critical issues. (pp.121-143). Boston: Northeastern University Press.
2. Althaus, F.A., & Henshaw, S.K. (1994). The effects of mandatory delay laws on abortion patients and providers. Family Planning Perspectives, 26(5), 228-231 + 233.
3. Beckman, L.J. & Harvey, S.M. (1998). The acceptability of medical abortion to women. In L.J. Beckman & S.M. Harvey (Eds). The new civil war (pp.189-210). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
4. Berkman, M.B., & O'Connor, R.E. (1993). Do women legislators matter? Female legislators and state abortion policy. In M.L. Goggin (Ed.), Understanding the new politics of abortion (pp. 268-284). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
5. Blank, R. M., George, C.C., & London, R. (1996). State abortion rates: The impact of policies, providers, politics and demographics, and economic environment. Journal of Health Economics, 15(5), 513-553.
6. Cartoof, V., & Klerman, J. (1986). Parental consent for abortion: The impact of the Massachusetts law. American Journal of Public Health, 76, 397-400.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2004). Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 53 (SS-9), 1-36.
8. Center for Reproductive Rights (2003). Fetal personhood/Unborn victims legislation. Retrieved on July, 21, 2003 from http://crlp.org/hill_pri_uvva.html.
9. Center for Reproductive Rights (2004). Endangering the health of young women. Retrieved on January, 3, 2005 from http://www.crlp.org/ pub_fac_ccpa.html.
10. Cohen, J.E., & Barrilleaux, C. (1993). Public opinion, interest groups, and public policy making: Abortion policy in the American states. In M.L. Goggin (Ed.), Understanding the new politics of abortion (pp. 203-221). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
11. DiNitto, D. (2005). Social welfare: Politics and public policy. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
12. Ellertson, C. (1997). Mandatory parental involvement in minors' abortions: Effects of the laws in Minnesota, Missouri, and Indiana. American Journal of Public Health, 87 (8), 1367-1374.
13. Fine, M. (1985). Reflections on a feminist psychology of women: Paradoxes and prospects. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 167-183.
14. Finer, L. B. & Henshaw, S.K. (2003). Abortion incidence and services in the United States in 2000. Family Planning Perspectives, 35(1), 6-15.
15. Fried, M. (1990). Transforming the reproductive rights movement: The post-Webster agenda. In M.G. Fried (Ed.), Transforming a movement (pp.1-14). Boston: Free Press.
16. Garbacz, C. (1990). Abortion demand. Population Research and Policy Review, March, 151-160.
17. George, J. (1999). Conceptual muddle, practical dilemma. International Social Work, 42(1), 15-26.
18. Goggin, M. L. (1993). Introduction: Aframework for understanding the new politics of abortion. In M.L. Goggin (Ed.), Understanding the new politics of abortion (pp. 1-18). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
19. Granberg, D., & Granberg, B.W. (1980). Abortion attitudes, 1965-1980: Trends and determinants. Family Planning Perspectives, 12(5), 250-261.
20. Haas-Wilson, D. (1993). The Economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: Parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 12(3), 498-511.
21. Haslet, D. C. (1997). Hull House and the birth control movement. Affilia, 12(3), 261-268.
22. Haynes, K.S., & Mickelson, J.S. (1997). Affecting change. New York: Longman.
23. Henshaw, S.K. (1991). The accessibility of abortion services in the United States. Family Planning Perspectives, 23(6), 246-252.
24. Henshaw, S.K. (1995a). Factors hindering access to abortion services. Family Planning Perspectives, 27(2), 54-59 + 87.
25. Henshaw, S.K. (1995b). The impact of requirements for parental consent on minors' abortions in Mississippi. Family Planning Perspectives, 27 3), 120-122.
26. Henshaw, S.K. (1998). Barriers to access to abortion services. In L.J. Beckman, & S.M. Harvey (Eds.), The new civil war (pp. 61-80). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
27. Henshaw, S.K., Forrest, J.D., Sullivan, E., & Tietze, C. (1982). Abortion services in the United States, 1979 and 1980. Family Planning Perspectives, 14(1), 5-15.
28. Henshaw, S. K., & Van Vort, J. (1994). Abortion services in the United States, 1991 and 1992. Family Planning Perspectives, 26(3), 110-112.
29. Henshaw, S.K., & Finer, L. B. (2003). The accessibility of abortion services in the United States, 2001. Family Planning Perspectives, 35 1), 16-24.
30. Joyce, T., & Kaestner, R. (1996). State reproductive policies and adolescent pregnancy resolution: The case of parental involvement laws. Journal of Health Economics, 15, 579-607.
31. Joyce, T., & Kaestner, R. (2000). The impact of Mississippi's mandatory delay law on the timing of abortion. Family Planning Perspectives, 32 1), 4-13.
32. Kreft, I., & Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing Multilevel Modeling. London: Sage Publications.
33. Levine, P. B., Trainor, A.B., & Zimmerman, D.J. (1996). The effect of Medicaid abortion funding restrictions on abortions, pregnancies and births. Journal of Health Economics, 15(5), 555-578.
34. Lichter, D. T., McLaughlin, D.K, & Ribar, D.C. (1999). State abortion policy, geographic access to abortion providers and changing family formation. Family Planning Perspectives, 31(2), 80.
35. McFarlane, D.R, & Meier, K.J. (1994). State abortion funding policies in 1990. Women & Health, 22(1), 99-115.
36. Medoff, M. H. (2002). The determinants and impact of state abortion restrictions. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 61(2), 481-493.
37. National Association of Social Workers. (1999). Code of ethics. Retrieved on July, 21, 2003 from http://www.socialworkers.org/pubs/code/ code.asp.
38. National Association of Social Workers. (2003). Family planning and reproductive choice. In Social work speaks (5th ed., pp. 124-131). Washington, DC: Author.
39. National Network of Abortion Funds. (2002, October). NNAF Profile Data 2001. Amherst, MA: Author.
40. National Network of Abortion Funds. (2006, October). NNAF Profile Data 2005. Amherst, MA: Author.
41. New, M. J. (2004). Analyzing the effects of state legislation on the incidence of abortion during the 1990's (Heritage Foundation CDA 04-01). Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation.
42. Pardeck, J.T. (2003). Should abortion rights be an accepted social-work value? (pp. 249-254). In H.J. Karger, J. Midgley, & C.B. Brown (Eds.), Controversial issues in social policy. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
43. Raudenbush, S.W., & Bryk, A.S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models. Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
44. Roberts, D. (1997). Killing the black body. New York: Vintage Books.
45. Rogers, J., Boruch, R. Stoms, G., & DeMoya, D. (1991). Impact of the Minnesota parental notification law on abortion and birth. American Journal of Public Health, 81, 294-298.
46. Russo, N. F., & Denious, J.E. (1998). Why is abortion such a controversial issue in the United States? In L. J. Beckman, & S. M. Harvey (Eds.), The new civil war (pp. 25-60). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
47. Schroedel, J. R. (2000). Is the fetus a person? Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
48. Schur, E.M. (1965). Crimes without victims: Deviant behavior and public policy-abortion, homosexuality, drug addiction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
49. Shelton, J. D., Brann, E.A., & Schultz, K.F. (1976). Abortion utilization: Does travel distance matter? Family Planning Perspectives, 8(6), 260-262.
50. Specht, H., & Courtney, M.E. (1994). Unfaithful angels: How social work has abandoned its mission. New York: Free Press.
51. Tatalovich, R., & Daynes, B.W. (1988). Introduction: What is social regulatory policy? In R. Tatalovich, & B.W. Daynes (Eds.), Social regulatory policy: Moral controversies in American politics (pp.131-152). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
52. Tate, R. (1998). An introduction to modeling outcomes in the behavioral and social sciences. Edina, MN: Burgess.
53. Tribe, L. H. (1992). Abortion. The clash of absolutes. New York: W.W. Norton.
54. Wyn, R., Solis, B., Ojeda, V.D., & Pourat, N. (2001). Falling through the cracks: Health insurance coverage of low-income women. Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser Foundation.