Mandatory parental involvement in minor's abortions: Effects of the laws in Minnesota, Missouri, and Indiana

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 87, Issue 8, 1997, Pages 1367-1374

  Ellertson, Charlotte ^a  

^a POPULATION COUNCIL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABORTION; ADOLESCENT PREGNANCY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; LAW; PARENT; REVIEW; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0030797589     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.87.8.1367     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Who Decides? A State-by-State Review of Abortion Rights. Washington, DC: NARAL Foundation/NARAL (National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League); 1993.
2. Parental Involvement Protects Teenagers from Physical Injury. Washington, DC: National Right to Life Committee; 1991.
3. Parental Involvement Protects Teenagers from Psychological Harm. Washington, DC: National Right to Life Committee; 1991.
4. Anderer S. Getting the facts: empirical evaluation and the constitutionality of pre-abortion parental notification statutes. Villanova Law Rev. 1991;36:1611-1663.
5. Parental Notice Laws: Their Catastrophic Impact on Teenagers' Right to Abortion. New York, NY: American Civil Liberties Union, Reproductive Freedom Project; 1991.
6. Teenage Women, Abortion and the Law. Washington, DC: National Abortion Federation; 1992.
7. Neal A. House committee okays teenage abortion bill [United Press International]. Nexis: Nexis Library, Mwest file; January 11, 1984.
8. Rogers J, Boruch R, Stoms G, DeMoya D. Impact of the Minnesota parental notification law on abortion and birth. Am J Public Health. 1991;81:294-298.
9. Henshaw S, Kost K. Parental involvement in minors' abortion decisions. Fam Plann Perspect. 1992;24:196-207,213.
10. Blum R, Resnick M, Stark T. The impact of a parental notification law on adolescent abortion decision making. Am J Public Health. 1987;77:619-620.
11. Jones E, Forrest J, Goldman N, et al. Teenage Pregnancy in Developed Countries. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press; 1986.
12. Cartoof V, Klerman J. Parental consent for abortion: the impact of the Massachusetts law. Am J Public Health. 1986;76:397-400.
13. Donovan P. Judging teenagers: how minors fare when they seek court-authorized abortions. Fam Plann Perspect. 1983;15:259-267.
14. Blum R, Resnick M, Stark T. Factors associated with the use of court bypass by minors to obtain abortions. Fam Plann Perspect. 1990;22:158-160.
15. Hodgson v Minnesota, US Supreme Court Nos. 88-1123 and 88-1309, October Term 1989, Joint Appendix.
16. Ellertson CE. Mandatory Parental Involvement in Minors' Abortions: Effects of the Laws in Minnesota, Missouri and Indiana. 1993. [Available from U.M.I. Dissertation Services, 300 N Zeeb Rd, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Order no. 9407108.]
17. Chatterjee S, Price B. Regression Analysis by Example. 2nd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 1991.
18. Aldrich JH, Nelson FD. Linear Probability, Logit and Probit Models. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications; 1984.
19. Parental Involvement Laws: The Minnesota Success Story. Washington, DC: National Right to Life Committee; 1991.
20. Parental Involvement Laws Cause No Increase in Late Abortions. Washington, DC: National Right to Life Committee; 1991.
21. Stone R, Waszak C. Adolescent knowledge and attitudes about abortion. Fam Plann Perspect. 1992;24:52-57.
22. Rogers J, Miller A. Inner-city birthrates following enactment of the Minnesota parental notification Law. Law Hum Behav. 1993;17(1):27-42.