Power and embodiment: Comment on Andersen

Gender and Society

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 99-103

  Paap, Kris ^a  

^a NEW YORK INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 37849039896     PISSN: 08912432     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0891243207310716     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Adair, Vivyan. 2002. Branded with infamy: Inscriptions of class and poverty in America. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 27 (2). 451 - 73.
2. Andersen, Margaret. 2005. Thinking about women: A quarter century's view. Gender & Society 19: 437 - 55.
3. Cregan, Kate. 2006. The sociology of the body: Mapping the abstraction of embodiment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Ferree, Myra Marx. 2001. The ironies of power: From the SWS president. Gender & Society 15: 649 - 53.
5. Lovejoy, Meg. 2001. Disturbances in the social body: Differences in body image and eating problems among African American and white women. Gender & Society 15: 239 - 61.
6. Paap, Kris. 2006. Working construction: Why white working-class men put themselves-and the labor movement-in harm's way. Ithaca, NY: ILR/Cornell University Press.
7. Risman, Barbara J. 2004. Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism. Gender & Society 18: 429 - 50.
8. Tichenor, Veronica Jaris. 2005. Maintaining men's dominance: Negotiating identity and power when she earns more. Sex Roles 5 (3-4): 191-205.
9. Williams, Christine. 1992. The glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in the "female" professions. Social Problems 39: 253 - 67.