Dynamic mechanisms for apparent slip on hydrophobic surfaces

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 70, Issue 2 2, 2004, Pages

  Lauga, Eric ^a   Brenner, Michael P ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; HYDROPHOBICITY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OSCILLATIONS; PHASE INTERFACES; SHEAR STRESS; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; VISCOSITY;

DILATATION; FLUID SLIP; SLIP LENGTHS; SOLID SURFACES;

FLUID DYNAMICS;

EID: 37649028544     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.026311     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. S. Goldstein, Modern Developments in Fluid Dynamics (Clarendon, Oxford, 1938), Vol. II, p. 676.
2. Y. Zhu and S. Granick, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 106102 (2002).
3. K.M. Jansons, Phys. Fluids 31, 15 (1988).
4. S. Richardson, J. Fluid Mech. 59, 707 (1973).
5. R. Pit, H. Hervet, and L. Léger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 980 (2000).
6. J. Baudry, E. Charlaix, A. Tonck, and D. Mazuyer, Langmuir 17, 5232 (2001).
7. V.S.J. Craig, C. Neto, and D.R.M. Williams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 054504 (2001).
8. Y. Zhu and S. Granick, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 096105 (2001).
9. E. Bonaccurso, M. Kappl, and H.-J. Butt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 076103 (2002).
10. J.-T. Cheng and N. Giordano, Phys. Rev. E 65, 031206 (2002).
11. D.C. Tretheway, and C.D. Meinhart, Phys. Fluids 14, L9 (2002).
12. C. Cottin-Bizonne, S. Jurine, J. Baudry, J. Crassous, F. Restagno, and E. Charlaix, Eur. Phys. J. E 9, 47 (2002).
13. P.A. Thompson and S.M. Troian, Nature (London) 389, 360 (1997).
14. J.-L. Barrat and L. Bocquet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4671 (1999).
15. H. Brenner and V. Ganesan, Phys. Rev. E 61, 6879 (2000).
16. M. Cieplak, J. Koplik, and J.R. Banavar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 803 (2001).
17. C. Denniston and M.O. Robbins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 178302 (2001).
18. E. Lauga and H.A. Stone, J. Fluid Mech. 489, 55 (2003).
19. P.G. de Gennes, Langmuir 18, 3413 (2002).
20. C.L.M.H. Navier, Mémoires de l'Académie Royale des Sciences de l'Institut de France VI, 389 (1823).
21. N. Ishida, T. Inoue, M. Miyahara, and K. Higashitani, Langmuir 16, 6377 (2000).
22. J.W.G. Tyrrell and P. Attard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 176104 (2001).
23. J.W.G. Tyrrell and P. Attard, Langmuir 18, 160 (2002).
24. R. Steitz, T. Gutberlet, T. Hauss, B. Klösgen, R. Krastev, S. Schemmel, A.C. Simonsen, and G.H. Findenegg, Langmuir 19, 2409 (2003).
25. J. Israelachvili, Intermolecular and Surface Forces (Academic, New York, 1992).
26. A. Carambassis, L.C. Jonker, P. Attard, and M.W. Rutland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5357 (1998).
27. J. Mahnke, J. Stearnes, R.A. Hayes, D. Fornasiero, and J. Ralston, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 1, 2793 (1999).
28. P. Attard, Langmuir 16, 4455 (2000).
29. G.E. Yakubov, H.-S. Butt, and O.I. Vinogradova, J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 3407 (2000).
30. E. Schnell, J. Appl. Phys. 27, 1149 (1956).
31. N.V. Churaev, V.D. Sobolev, and A.N. Somov, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 97, 574 (1984).
32. K. Watanabe, Y. Udagawa, and H. Udagawa, J. Fluid Mech. 381, 225 (1999).
33. O.I. Vinogradova, Langmuir 11, 2213 (1995).
34. S. Ljunggren and J.C. Eriksson, Colloids Surf., A 129-130, 151 (1997).
35. P. Attard, Physica A 314, 696 (2002).
36. J.R. Philip, Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 23, 353 (1972).
37. G.I. Taylor, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 219, 186 (1953).
38. L.M. Hocking, Phys. Fluids A 5, 793 (1993).
39. C. Quilliet and B. Berge, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 6, 34 (2001).
40. T. Chou, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 106101 (2001).
41. T. Onda, S. Shibuichi, N. Satoh, and K. Tsuji, Langmuir 12, 2125 (1996).
42. J. Bico, C. Marzolin, and D. Quere, Europhys. Lett. 47, 220 (1999).
43. G.E. Yakubov, H.-J. Butt, and O.I. Vinogradova, J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 3407 (2000).
44. 1 ) with τ- 1 ms or less in experiments such as [8].
45. The model also requires specification of the effective slip length A. in Eq. (3). Since a set of gas bubbles on a surface resists fluid motion more strongly than a gas layer, Eq. (1) is not appropriate. We have experimented with several models (see, e.g., [18,36]), all of which give slip length in the range (λ - 10-100 nm depending on the experiment). Owing to the weak dependence of f* on the slip length, the precise value of λ has virtually no impact on the quantitative results of our fits.