Evidence for “fragile” glass-forming behavior in the relaxation of Coulomb frustrated three-dimensional systems

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 65, Issue 6, 2002, Pages

  Grousson, M ^a   Tarjus, G ^a   Viot, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GLASS TRANSITION; MAGNETIZATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; RELAXATION PROCESSES; VISCOUS FLOW;

GLASS FORMING LIQUIDS; LONG RANGE FRUSTRATIONS; SUPERCOOLED LIQUIDS; THREE DIMENSIONAL MODELS;

SUPERCOOLING;

EID: 37649027334     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.65.065103     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. M.D. Ediger, C.A. Angell, and S.R. Nagel J. Phys. Chem. 100, 13200 (1996);G. Tarjus and D. Kivelson, in Jamming and Rheology: Constrained Dynamics on Microscopic and Macroscopic Scales, edited by A. J. Liu and S. Nagel (Taylor & Francis, London, 2001), p. 20;
2. P.G. Debenedetti and F.H. Stillinger, Nature (London) 410, 259 (2001).
3. D. Kivelson, S.A. Kivelson, X.L. Zhao, Z. Nussinov, and G. Tarjus, Physica A 219, 27 (1995);
4. G. Tarjus, D. Kivelson, and P. Viot, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 12, 6497 (2000).
5. D. Nelson and F. Spaepen, Solid State Phys. 42, 1 (1989);J. F. Sadoc and R. Mosseri, Geometrical Frustration (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1999).
6. For a modulated ordered phase with icosahedral local order, see M. Dzugutov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2924 (1993).
7. M. Grousson, G. Tarjus, and P. Viot, Phys. Rev. E 64, 036109 (2001).
8. S.A. Brazovskii, Sov. Phys. JETP 41, 85 (1975).
9. M. Grousson, Ph.D. thesis, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France, 2001.
10. M. Grousson, G. Tarjus, and P. Viot, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3455 (2001).
11. L. Chayes, V.J. Emery, S.A. Kivelson, Z. Nussinov, and G. Tarjus, Physica A 225, 129 (1996);
12. Z. Nussinov, J. Rudnick, S.A. Kivelson, and L.N. Chayes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 472 (1999).
13. T.R. Kirkpatrick, D. Thirumalai, and P.G. Wolynes, Phys. Rev. A 40, 1045 (1989).
14. J. Schmalian and P.G. Wolynes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 836 (2000);
15. Phys. Rev. Lett.J. SchmalianP.G. Wolynes86, 3456 (2001);
16. H. Westfahl, J. Schmalian, and P.G. Wolynes, Phys. Rev. B 64, 174203 (2001).
17. See, e.g., P. Chandra, M.V. Feigelman, and L.B. Ioffe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4805 (1996);
18. S.J. Lee and B. Kim, Phys. Rev. E 60, 1503 (1999);
19. E. Marinari, G. Parisi, and F. Ritort, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 28, 327 (1995);
20. H. Yin and B. Chakraborty, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2058 (2001);
21. Phys. Rev. Lett.G. Biroli and M. Mézard, 88, 025501 (2002).