Importance of genetic factors for the recolonisation of rare plant communities - Genetic Diversity in practical nature conservation;Bedeutung Genetischer Faktoren für die Wieder-Ansiedlung Seltener Pflanzengemeinschaften: Genetische Diversität in der Praxis des Naturschutzes

Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 21-25

  Donath, Tobias W ^a   Lutz Eckstein, R ^a  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION GENETICS; GENE FLOW; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC VARIATION; HETEROSIS; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; NATURE CONSERVATION; PLANT COMMUNITY; RARITY; RECOLONIZATION;

EID: 37649013910     PISSN: 09406808     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. ALLENDORF, F.W., LUIKART, G. (2007): Conservation and the Genetics of Populations. Blackwell, Oxford, 642 S.
2. BAILLIE, J.E.M., HILTON-TAYLOR, C., STUART, S.N. (2004): 2004IUCN Red List of threatened species. A global species assessment. IUCN, Gland-Cambridge.
3. BARKER, J.P., BERENDSE,F. ( 1999): Constraints in the restoration of ecological diversity in grassland and heathlandcommunities.Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 63-68.
4. BARRETT, S.C.H., KOHN, J.R. (1991): Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants: implications for conservation. In: FALK, DA., HOLSINGER, K.E., Genetics and conservation of rare plants, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 304 S.
5. BECKER, U. (2005): Bedeutung von quantitativ-genetischer Differenzierung und lokaler Anpassung für den Schutz von Pflanzenarten in Europa am Beispiel von Carlina vulgaris L. und Hypochoeris radicóla L. Treffp. Biol. Vielfalt 6,185-192.
6. BENDER, C. (1991): Genetik und Naturschutz. Ber. ökol. Forsch. 4, 158-179.
7. BISCHOFF, A., CRÉMIEUX, L., SMILAUEROVA, M., LAWSON, C.S., MORTIMER, S.R., DOLEZAL, J., LANTA, V., EDWARDS, A.R., BROOK, A.J., MACEL, M., LEP?, J., STEINGER, T., MÜLLER-SCHÄRER, H. (2006): Detecting local adaptation in widespread grassland species - the importance of scale and local plant community. J. Ecol. 94, 1130-1142.
8. BOSSHARD, A. (1999): Renaturierung artenreicher Wiesen auf nährstoffreichen Böden. Diss. Bot. 303, 1-194.
9. DONATH, T.W., HÖLZEL, N., OTTE, A. (2003): The impact of site conditions and seed dispersal on restoration success in alluvial meadows. Appl. Veg. Sci. 6, 12-22.
10. DURKA, W. (1999): Genetic diversity in peripheral and subcentral populations of Corrigiola litoralis L. (Illecebraceae). Heredity 83,476-484.
11. ECKSTEIN, R.L., O'NEILL, R.A., DANIHELKA, J., OTTE, A., KÖHLER, W. (2006): Genetic structure among and within peripheral and central populations of three endangered floodplain violets. Mol. Ecol. 15, 2367-2379.
12. ECKSTEIN, R.L., OTTE, A. (2005): Effects of cleistogamy and pollen source on seed production and offspring performance in three endangered violets. Basic Appl. Ecol. 6, 339-350.
13. EDMANDS, S. (2007): Between a rock and a hard place: evaluating the relative risks of inbreeding and outbreeding for conservation and management. Mol. Ecol. 16, 463-475.
14. FISCHER, M., MATTHIES, D. (1997): Mating structure and inbreeding and outbreeding depression in the rare plant Gentianella germanica (Gentianaceae). Am. I. Bot. 84, 1685-1692.
15. FRANKEL, O.H., SOULÉ, M.E. (1981): Conservation and Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
16. GUSTAFSON, D.J., GIBSON, D.J., NICKRENT, D.L. (2005): Using local seeds in prairie restoration data support the paradigm. NativePlants 6, 25-28.
17. HEDRICK, P.W. (2001): Conservation genetics: where are we now? Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 629-636.
18. HEYWOOD, VH. (1995): The global biodiversity assessment. United Nations Environment Programme, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
19. HÖLZEL, N., BISSELS, S., DONATH, T.W., HANDKE, K., HARNISCH, M., OTTE, A. (2006): Renaturierung von Stromtal wiesen am hessischen Oberrhein. Natur. Biol. Vielfalt 31, 1-263.
20. HUFFORD, K.M., MAZER, S.J. (2003): Plant ecotypes: genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration. Trends Ecol. Evol.18, 147-155.
21. KELLER, L.F., WALLER, D.M. (2002): Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 230-241.
22. KELLER, M., KOLLMANN, J., EDWARDS, P.J. (2000): Genetic introgression from distant provenances reduces fitness in local weed populations. J. Appl. Ecol. 37, 647-659.
23. KIRMER, A. (2004): Methodische Grundlagen und Ergebnisse initiierter Vegetationsentwicklung auf xerothermen Extremstandorten des ehemaligen Braunkohlentagebaus in Sachsen-Anhalt. Diss. Bot. 385,1-167.
24. KLINGENSTEIN, F., DRIESCH, VON DEN M., LOBIN, W. (2002): Bedeutung und Aktivitäten der Botanischen Gärten in ex-situ- und in-situ-Artenschutz in Deutschland auf Grundlage der Biodiversitäts-Konvention. Schr.-R. Vegetationskde. 36, 139-150.
25. KORNECK, D., SCHNITTLER, M., VOLLMER, I. (1996): Rote Liste der Farn- und Blütenpflanzen (Pteridophyta et Spermatophyta) Deutschlands. Schr.-R. Vegetationskde. 28, 21-187.
26. LANDE, R. (1998): Anthropogenic, ecological and genetic factors in extinction and conservation. Res. Popul. Ecol. 40, 259-269.
27. LEIMU, R., MUTIKEINEN, P., KORICHEVA, J., FISCHER, M. (2006): How general are positive relationships between plant population size, fitness and genetic variation? J. Ecol. 94, 942-952.
28. LESICA, P., ALLENDORF, W. (1995) : When are peripheral populations valuable for conservation? Conserv. Biol. 9, 753-760.
29. LINHART, Y.B., GRANT, M.C. (1996): Evolutionary significance of local genetic differentiation in plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27, 237-277.
30. MCKAY, J.K., CHRISTIAN, CE., HARRISON, S., RICE, K.J. (2005):, How local is local?" - A review of practical and conceptual issues in the genetics of restoration. Rest. Ecol. 13, 432-440.
31. MCNEELEY, J. A., MILLER, K.R., REID, W.V., MITTERMEIER, R.A., WERNER, T.B. (1990): Conserving the world's biological diversity. IUCN, World Resources Institute, Conservation International, WWF-US, and the World Bank. Washington, DC.
32. MÜNZBERGOVÁ, Z. (2006): Effect of population size on the prospect of species survival. Folia Geobot. 41, 137-150.
33. NOSS, R.F. (1990): Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conserv. Biol. 4, 355-364.
34. OUBORG, NJ., VERGEER, P., Mix, C. (2006): The rough edges of the conservation genetics paradigm for plants. J. Ecol. 94, 1233-1248.
35. PFADENHAUER, J., FISCHER, F.P., HELFER, W., JOAS, C., LÖSCH, R., MILLER.U., MILTZ, C., SCHMID, H., SIEREN, E., WIESINGER, K. (2000): Sicherung und Entwicklung der Heiden im Norden von München - Ergebnisse aus dem E+E-Vorhaben 89211-1/94 des Bundesamtes für Naturschutz. Angew. Landschaftsök.32, 311 S.
36. RAABOVÁ, J., MÜNZBERGOVÁ, Z., FISCHER, M. (2007): Ecological rather than geographic or genetic distance affects local adaptation of the rare perennial herb, Aster amellus. Biol. Cons. 139, 348-357.
37. SCHMIDT, K., JENSEN, K. (2000): Genetic structure and AFLP variation of remnant populations in the rare plant Pedicularis palustris (Scrophulariaceae) and its relation to population size and reproductive components. Am. J. Bot. 87, 678-689.
38. ŠEFFER, J., STANOVÁ, V., MERTANOVÁ, S. (1999): Restoration of species-rich floodplain meadows experimental approach. Morava River Floodplain Meadows - Importance, Restoration and Management. In: ŠEFFER, J., STANOVÁ , V., Morava River Floodplain Meadows. DAPHNE - Centre for Applied Ecology, Bratislava, 187 S.
39. SPIELMAN, D., BROOK, B.W., FRANKHAM, R. (2004): Most species are not driven to extinction before genetic factors impact them. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 15261-15264.
40. VAN ANDEL, J. (1998): Intraspecific variability in the context of ecological restoration projects. Perspect. Plant Ecol. 1/2, 221-237.
41. VERGEER, P., SONDEREN, E., OUBORG, N.J. (2004): Introduction strategies put to the test: local adaptation versus heterosis. Cons. Biol. 18, 812-821.
42. VITOUSEK, P.M., MOONEY, H.A., LUBCHENKO, J., MELILLO, J.M. (1997): Human domination of earth's ecosystems. Science 277, 494-499.
43. WALDHARDT, R., OTTE, A. (2000): Zur Terminologie und wissenschaftlichen Anwendung des Begriffs Biodiversität. Wasser & Boden 52, 10-13.
44. WILLIAMS, S. L. (2001): Reduced genetic diversity in eelgrass transplantations affects both population growth and individual fitness. Ecol. Appl. 11, 1472-1488.