Outcomes-based evaluations supporting computer-assisted surgery and minimally invasive surgery for total hip arthroplasty

Expert Review of Medical Devices

Volumn 4, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 873-883

  Ulrich, Slif D ^a   Bonutti, Peter M ^b   Seyler, Thorsten M ^c   Marker, David R ^a   Jones, Lynne C ^d   Mont, Michael A ^a  

^a SINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE   (United States)

^b Bonutti Clinic   (United States)

^c Department of Orthopaedic Surgery ^*  (United States)

^d JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer navigation; Computer assisted surgery; Hip; Minimally invasive; Resurfacing hip arthroplasty; Review; Small incision; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FEMUR FRACTURE; FLUOROSCOPY; HIP DISLOCATION; HOSPITALIZATION COST; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEG LENGTH INEQUALITY; METHODOLOGY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MUSCLE WEAKNESS; NERVE PARALYSIS; OPERATION DURATION; PERIPHERAL NERVE INJURY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; REVIEW; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL RATE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WOUND COMPLICATION;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; EVALUATION STUDIES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 37649009196     PISSN: 17434440     EISSN: 17452422     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1586/17434440.4.6.873     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. Callaghan JJ. Albright JC, Goetz DD, Olejniczak JP, Johnston RC. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement. Minimum twenty-five-year follow-up. J. Bone Joint Surg. 82(4), 487-497 (2000).
2. Sanchez-Sotelo J, Berry DJ, Harmsen S. Long-term results of use of a collared matte-finished femoral component fixed with second-generation cementing techniques. A fifteen-year-median follow-up study. J. Bone Joint Surg. 84A(9). 1636-1641 (2002).
3. Skutek M, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH et al. The twenty to twenty-five-year outcomes of the Harris design-2 matte-finished cemented total hip replacement. A concise follow-up of a previous report. J. Bone Joint Surg. 89(4), 814-818 (2007).
4. Alberton GM, High WA, Morrey BF. Dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of risk factors and treatment options. J. Bone Joint Surg. 84A(10), 1788-1792 (2002).
5. Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Bennett D et al. Total trip arthroplastles: what are the reasons for revision? Int. Orthop. (2007).
6. Matta JM, Shahrdar C, Ferguson T. Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 441, 115-124 (2005).
7. Kim YH. Comparison of primary total hip arthroplasties performed with a minimally invasive technique or a standard technique: a prospective and randomized study. J. Arthroplasty 21(8), 1092-1098 (2006).
8. Bal BS, Haltom D, Aleto T, Barrett M. Early complications of primary total hip replacement performed with a two-incision minimally invasive technique. J. Bone Joint Surg. 87(11). 2432-2438 (2005).
9. Woolson ST, Mow CS, Syquia JF, Lannin JV, Schurman DJ. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J. Bone Joint Surg. 86A(7), 1353-1358 (2004).
10. Berger RA. The technique of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty using the two-incision approach. Instr. Course Lect. 53, 149-155 (2004).
11. Berger RA. Total hip arthroplasty using the minimally invasive two-incision approach. Clin. Orthop. Relat Res. (417), 232-241 (2003).
12. Archibeck MJ, White RE Jr. Learning curve for the two-inclsion total hip replacement. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (429), 232-238 (2004).
13. Kennon RE, Keggi JM, Wetmore RS et al. Total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive anterior surgical approach. J. Bone Joint Surg. 85A(Suppl. 4), 39-48 (2003).
14. Asayama I, Kinsey TL, Mahoney OM. Two-year experience using a limited-incision direct lateral approach in total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty 21(8), 1083-1091 (2006).
15. Rachbauer F. [Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach]. Orthopade 34(11), 1103-1104, (2005).
16. Khan RJ, Fick D, Khoo P et al. Less invasive total hip arthroplasty: description of a new technique. J. Arthroplasty 21(7), 1038-1046 (2006).
17. Waldman BJ. Advancements in minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 26(8 Suppl.) S833-S836 (2003).
18. Rittmeister M, Peters A. Comparison of total hip arthroplasty via a posterior mini-incision versus a classic anterolateral approach. Der Orthopade 35(7), 716, 718-722 (2006).
19. Hartzband MA. Posterolateral minimal incision for total hip replacement: technique and early results. Orthop. Clin. North Am. 35(2), 119-129 (2004).
20. White SP, Smith EJ. Minimal access surgery for total hip arthroplasty - current beliefs and activity profile in the UK. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 89(1), 36-40 (2007).
21. DiGioia AM 3rd, Plakseychuk AY, Levison TJ, Jaramaz B. Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation. J. Arthroplasty 18(2), 12311-12328 (2003).
22. Wright JM, Crockett HC, Delgado S et al. Mini-incision for total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, controlled investigation with 5-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 19(5), 538-545 (2004).
23. Howell JR, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Minimally invasive versus standard incision anterolateral hip replacement: a comparative study. Orthop. Clin. North Am. 35(2), 153-162 (2004).
24. Sculco TP, Jordan LC, Walter WL. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: the Hospital for Special Surgery experience. Orthop. Clin. North Am. 35(2), 137-142 (2004).
25. Wenz JF, Gurkan I, Jibodh SR. Mini-incision total hip arthroplasty: a comparative assessment of perioperative outcomes. Orthopedics 25(10), 1031-1043 (2002).
26. Bal BS, Haltom D, Aleto T, Barrett M. Early complications of primary total hip replacement performed with a two-incision minimally invasive technique. Surgical technique. J. Bone Joint Surg., 88(Suppl. 1), 221-233 (2006).
27. Berry DJ, Berger RA, Callaghan JJ et al. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Development, early results, and a critical analysis. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Orthopaedic Association, Charleston, South Carolina, USA, June 14, 2003. J. Bone Joint Surg. 85A(11), 2235-2246 (2003).
28. Ciminiello M, Parvizi J, Sharkey PF, Eslampour A, Rothman RH. Total hip arthroplasty: is small incision better? J. Arthroplasty 21(4), 484-488 (2006).
29. Fehring TK, Mason JB. Catastrophic complications of minimally invasive hip surgery. A series of three cases. J. Bone Joint Surg. 87(4), 711-714 (2005).
30. Labovitch RS, Bozic KJ, Hansen E. An evaluation of information available on the internet regarding minimally invasive hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty 21(1), 1-5 (2006).
31. Nakamura S, Matsuda K, Arai N, Wakimoto N, Matsushita T. Mini-incision posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Int. Orthop. 28(4), 214-217 (2004).
32. Higuchi F, Gotoh M, Yamaguchi N et al. Minimally invasive uncemented total hip arthroplasty through an anterolateral approach with a shorter skin incision. J. Orthop. Sci. 8(6), 812-817 (2003).
33. Pagnano MW, Leone J, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD. Two-incision THA had modest outcomes and some substantial complications. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 441, 86-90 (2005).
34. Ogonda L, Wilson R, Archbold P et al. A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J. Bone Joint Surg. 87(4), 70177 (2005).
35. Chimento GF, Pavone V, Sharrock N et al. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. J. Arthroplasty 20(2), 139-144 (2005).
36. de Beer J, Petruccelli D, Zalzal P, Winemaker MJ. Single-incision, minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: length doesn't matter. J. Arthroplasty 19(8), 945-950 (2004).
37. Teet JS, Skinner HB, Khoury L. The effect of the "mini" incision in total hip arthroplasty on component position. J. Arthroplasty 21(4), 503-507 (2006).
38. O'Brien DA, Rorabeck CH. The mini-incision direct lateral approach in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 441, 99-103 (2005).
39. Goldstein WM, Branson JJ. Posterior-lateral approach to minimal incision total hip arthroplasty. Orthop. Clin. North Am. 35(2), 131-136 (2004).
40. Mardones R, Pagnano MlW, Nemanich JP, Trousdale RT. The Frank Stinchfield Award: muscle damage after total hip arthroplasty done with the two-incision and mini-posterior techniques. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 441, 6366-6367 (2005).
41. Mont MA, Ragland PS, Marker D. Resurfacing hip arthroplasty: comparison of a minimally invasive versus standard approach. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 441, 125-131 (2005).
42. McMinn DJ, Daniel J, Pynsent PB, Pradhan C. Mini-incision resurfacing arthroplasty of hip through the posterior approach. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 441, 91-98 (2005).
43. Lieberman JR, Wenger N. New technology and the orthopaedic surgeon: are you protecting your patients? Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (429), 338-341 (2004).
44. Ranawat CS, Ranawat AS. A common sense approach to minimally invasive total hip replacemmt. Orthopedics 28(9), 937-938 (2005).
45. Kolisek FR, Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Marker DR, Jessup NM, Mont MA. Comparison study of minimally invasive dual-incision versus posterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty. Surg. Technol. Int. [In press] (2007).
46. Dorr LD, Thomas D, Long WT, Polatin PB, Strianni LE. Psychologic reasons for patients preferring minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (2007).
47. Mow CS, Woolson ST, Ngarmukos SG. Park EH, Lorenz HP. Comparison of scars from total hip replacements done with a standard or a mini-incision. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 441, 8085-8088 (2005).
48. Lawlor M, Humphreys P, Morrow E. et al. Comparison of early postoperative functional levels following total hip replacement using minimally invasive versus standard incisions. A prospective randomized blinded trial. Clin. Rehabil. 19(5), 4654-4674 (2005).
49. Hube R, Birke A, Hein W, Klima S. CT1-based and fluoroscopy-based navigation for cup implantation in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Surg. Technol. Int. 11, 2752-280 (2003).
50. Kiefer H, OrthoPilot cup navigation - how to optimise cup positioning? Int. Orthop. 27(Suppl. 1), S37-S42 (2003).
51. Digioia AM, 3rd, Jaramaz B, Plakseychuk AY et al. Comparison of a mechanical acetabular alignment guide with computer placement of the socket. J. Arthroplasty 17(3), 359-364 (2002).
52. Weil Y, Mattan Y, Kandel L, Eisenberg O, Liebergall M. Navigation-assisted minimally invasive two-incision total hip arthoplasty. Orthopedics 29(3), 2002-2006 (2006).
53. Wixson RL, MacDonald MA. Total hip arthroplasty through a minimal posterior approach using imageless computer-assisted hip navigation. J. Arthroplasty 20(7 Suppl. 3), 51-56 (2005).
54. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J. Bone Joint Surg. 60(2), 217-220 (1978).
55. Sugano N, Nishii T, Miki H et al. Mid-term results of cementless total hip replacement using a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing with and without computer navigation. J. Bone Joint Surg. 89(4), 455-460 (2007).
56. Parratte S, Argenson JN. Validation and usefulness of a computer-assisted cup-positioning system in total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, controlled study. J. Bone Joint Surg. 89(3), 494-499 (2007).
57. Honl M, Schwieger K, Salineros M et al. Orientation of the acetabular component. A comparison of five navigation systems with conventional surgical technique. J. Bone Joint Surg. 88(10), 1401-1405 (2006).
58. Wolf A, Digioia AM 3rd, Mor AB, Jaramaz B. Cup alignment error model for total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (437), 132-137 (2005).
59. Reininga IH, Wagenmakers R, van den Akker-Scheek I et al. Effectiveness of computer-navigated minimally invasive total hip surgery compared to conventional total hip arthroplasty: design of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 8, 4 (2007).
60. Bennett D, Ogonda L, Elliott D, Humphreys L, Beverland DE. Comparison of gait kinematics in patients receiving minimally invasive and traditional hip replacement surgery a prospective blinded study. Gait & Posture 23(3), 374-382 (2006).
61. Hart R, Stipcak V, Janecek M, Visna P. Component position following total hip arthroplasty through a miniinvasive posterolateral approach. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica 71(1), 60-64 (2005).
62. Haaker RG, Tiedjen K, Ottersbach A et al. Comparison of conventional versus computer-navigated acetabular component insertion. J. Arthroplasty 22(2), 151-159 (2007).
63. Murphy SB, Ecker TM, Tannast M. THA performed using conventional and navigated tissue-preserving techniques. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 453, 160-167 (2006).
64. Kalteis T, Handel M, Bathis H et al. Imageless navigation for insertion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: is it as accurate as CT-based navigation? J. Bone Joint Surg. 88(2), 163-167 (2006).
65. Tannast M, Langlotz F, Kubiak-Langer M, Langlotz U, Siebenrock KA. Accuracy and potential pitfalls of fluoroscopy-guided acetabular cup placement. Comput. Aided Surg. 10(566), 329-336 (2005).