New technology and the orthopaedic surgeon: Are you protecting your patients?

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 429, Issue , 2004, Pages 338-341

  Lieberman, Jay R ^a   Wenger, Neil ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE NECROSIS; BONE PROSTHESIS; CARTILAGE GRAFT; CHONDROPATHY; CLINICAL PRACTICE; ETHICS; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HUMAN; INCISION; INFORMED CONSENT; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SAFETY; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TECHNOLOGY; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 9644291428     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000146540.62612.7d     Document Type: Review

References (7)

1. Agich GJ: Ethics and innovation in medicine. J Med Ethics 27: 295-296, 2001.
2. Bekelman JE, Li Y, Gross CP: Scope and impact of financial conflicts conflicts of interest in biomedical research: A systemic review. JAMA 289:454-465, 2003.
3. Berry DJ, Berger RA, Callaghan JJ, et al: Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: Development, early results, and critical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg 85A:2235-2246, 2003.
4. Boyd EA, Bero LA: Assessing faculty financial relationships with industry: A case study. JAMA 284:2209-2214, 2000.
5. McKneally MF, Daar AS: Introducing new technologies: Protecting subjects of surgical innovation and research. World J Surg 27:930-934, 2003.
6. Miller FG, Rosenstein DL, DeRenzo EG: Professional integrity in clinical research. JAMA 280:1449-1454, 1998.
7. Wheeler R: One person's innovation is another's experiment. BMJ 320:1548, 2000.