The effect of brief-tone stimulus duration on the brain stem auditory steady-state response

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 121-133

  Mo, Lingyan ^a   Stapells, David R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY RESPONSE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN STEM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 37649003048     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31815d6343     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Beattie, R. C., Moretti, M., & Warren, V. (1984). Effects of risetime, frequency, and intensity on the early/middle evoked response. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 114-127.
2. Beattie, R. C., & Torre, P. (1997). Effects of rise-fall time and repetition rate on the auditory brainstem response to 0.5 and 1 kHz tone bursts using normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Scandinavian Audiology, 26, 23-32.
3. Cobb, J., Skinner, P., & Burns, J. (1978). Effects of signal rise time and frequency on the brainstem auditory evoked response. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 21, 408-416.
4. Dimitrijevic, A., John, M. S., van Roon, P., & Picton, T. W. (2001). Human auditory steady-state responses to tones independently modulated in both frequency and amplitude. Ear and Hearing, 22(2), 100-111.
5. Dimitrijevic, A., John, M. S., van Roon, P., Purcell, D. W., Adamonis, J., Ostroff, J., et al. (2002). Estimating the audiogram using multiple auditory steady-state responses. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 13(4), 205-224.
6. Dolphin, W. F., Chertoff, M. E., & Burkard, R. (1994). Comparison of the envelope following response in the Mongolian gerbil using two-tone and sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96, 2225-2234.
7. Dolphin, W. F., & Mountain, D. C. (1993). The envelope following response (EFR) in the Mongolian gerbil to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated signals in the presence of simultaneously gated pure tones. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94, 3215-3226.
8. Han, D., Mo, L., Liu, H., Chen, J., & Huang, L. (2006). Threshold estimation in children using auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. ORL, 68, 64-68.
9. Herdman, A. T., Picton, T. W., & Stapells, D. R. (2002). Place specificity of multiple auditory steady-state responses. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 1569-1582.
10. Herdman, A. T., & Stapells, D. R. (2001). Thresholds determined using the monotic and dichotic multiple auditory steady-state response technique in normal-hearing subjects. Scandinavian Audiology, 30, 41-49.
11. Herdman, A. T., & Stapells, D. R. (2003). Auditory steady-state response thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing impairment. International Journal of Audiology, 42, 237-248.
12. Jacobson, J. T. (1983). Effects of rise time and noise masking on tone pip auditory brainstem responses. Seminars in Hearing, 4, 363-372.
13. John, M. S., Dimitrijevic, A., & Picton, T. W. (2002). Auditory steady-state responses to exponential modulation envelopes. Ear and Hearing, 23(2), 106-117.
14. John, M. S., Dimitrijevic, A., & Picton, T. W. (2003). Efficient stimuli for evoking auditory steady-state responses. Ear and Hearing, 24(5), 406-423.
15. John, M. S., Dimitrijevic, A., van Roon, P., & Picton, T. W. (2001). Multiple auditory steady-state responses to AM and FM stimuli. Audiology & Neuro-Otology, 6(1), 12-27.
16. John, M. S., Lins, O. G., Boucher, B. L., & Picton, T. W. (1998). Multiple auditory steady-state responses (MASTER): stimulus and recording parameters. Audiology, 37, 59-82.
17. John, M. S., & Picton, T. W. (2000). MASTER: a windows program for recording multiple auditory steady-state responses. Computing Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 61, 125-150.
18. John, M. S., Purcell, D. W., Dimitrijevic, A., & Picton, T. W. (2002). Advantages and caveats when recording steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 13(5), 246-259.
19. Kodera, K., Hink, R., Yamada, O., & Suzuki, J. I. (1979). Effects of rise time on simultaneously recorded auditory-evoked potentials from the early, middle, and late ranges. Audiology, 18, 395-405.
20. Lins, O. G., & Picton, T. W. (1995). Auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. Electroencephalography and clinical Neurophysiology, 96, 420-432.
21. Lins, O. G., Picton, T. W., Boucher, B. L., Durieux-Smith, A., Champagne, S. C., Moran, L. M., et al. (1996). Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state responses. Ear and Hearing, 17, 81-96.
22. Luts, H., Desloovere, C., & Wouters, J. (2005). Clinical application of dichotic multiple-stimulus auditory steady-state responses in high-risk newborns and young children. Audiology & Neuro-Otology, 11(1), 24-37.
23. Picton, T. W., Dimitrijevic, A., Perez-Abalo, M. C., & van Roon, P. (2005). Estimating audiometric thresholds using auditory steady-state responses. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 16(3), 140-156.
24. Picton, T. W., John, M. S., Dimitrijevic, A. & Purcell, D. (2003). Human auditory steady-state responses. Int J Audiol, 42(4), 177-219.
25. Picton, T. W., Linden, R. D., Hamel, G., & Maru, J. T. (1983). Aspects of averaging. Seminars in Hearing, 4, 327-341.
26. Rance, G., Roper, R., Symons, L., Moody, L. J., Poulis, C., Dourlay, M., et al. (2005). Hearing threshold estimation in infants using auditory steady-state responses. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 16(5), 291-300.
27. Ross, M., & Seewald, R. C. (1988). Hearing aid selection and evaluation with young children. In F. Bess (Ed.), Hearing in children (pp. 190-213). Parkton, MD: York Press.
28. Savio, G., Perez-Abalo, M. C., Gaya, J., Hernandez, O., & Mijares, E. (2006). Test accuracy and prognostic validity of multiple auditory steady state responses for targeted hearing screening. International Journal of Audiology, 45(2), 109-120.
29. Stapells, D. R. (2000a). Frequency-specific evoked potential audiometry in infants. In R. C. Seewald (Ed.), A sound foundation through early amplification (pp. 13-31). Basel: Phonak AG.
30. Stapells, D. R. (2000b). Threshold estimation by the tone-evoked auditory brainstem response: a literature meta-analysis. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 24(2), 74-83.
31. Stapells, D. R., Herdman, A., Small, S. A., Dimitrijevic, A., & Hatton, J. (2005). Current status of the auditory steadystate responses for estimating an infant's audiogram. In R. C. Seewald & J. Bamford (Eds.), A sound foundation through early amplification 2004 (pp. 43-59). Basel: Phonak AG.
32. Stapells, D. R., & Picton, T. W. (1981). Technical aspects of brainstem evoked potential audiometry using tones. Ear and Hearing, 2, 20-29.
33. Sturzebecher, E., Cebulla, M., & Neumann, K. (2003). Click-evoked ABR at high stimulus repetition rates for neonatal hearing screening. International Journal of Audiology, 42(2), 59-70.
34. Sturzebecher, E., Cebulla, M., & Pschirrer, U. (2001). Efficient stimuli for recording of the amplitude modulation following response. Audiology, 40(2), 63-68.
35. Tlumak, A. I., Durrant, J. D., & Collet, L. (2007). 80 Hz auditory steady-state responses (ASSR) at 250 Hz and 12,000 Hz. International Journal of Audiology, 46, 26-30.
36. Valdes-Sosa, M. J., Bobes, M. A., Perez-Abalo, M. C., Perera, M., Carballo, J. A., & Valdes-Sosa, P. (1987). Comparison of auditory-evoked potential detection methods using signal detection theory. Audiology, 26(3), 166-178.
37. Vander Werff, K. R., & Brown, C. J. (2005). Effect of audiometric configuration on threshold and suprathreshold auditory steady-state responses. Ear and Hearing, 26(3), 310-326.