Teleconsultation: Rejected and Emerging Uses

Methods of Information in Medicine

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 451-457

  Sicotte, Cloude ^a   Lehoux, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Information and communication technology (ICT); Teleconsultation; Telemedicine; Users' mediated use

Indexed keywords

CANADA; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONSULTATION; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HUMAN; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 0142090645     PISSN: 00261270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634348     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Watts LA, Monk AF. Telemedicine, what happens in remote consultation. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 1999; 15,1: 220-35.
2. Wootton R, Craig J, eds. Introduction to telemedicine. London: The Royal Society of Medicine Press; 1999.
3. Bashshur RL. Critical issues in telemedicine. Telemedicine Journal 1997; 3,2: 113-26.
4. Field MJ, editor. Telemedicine. A guide to assessing telecommunications in health care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1996.
5. Roine R, Ohinmaa A, Hailey D. Assessing telemedicine: a systematic review of the literature. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2001; 165: 765-71.
6. Wootton R. Recent advances in telemedicine. BMJ 2001; 323: 557-60.
7. DeSanctis G, Scott Poole M. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use, adaptive structuration theory. Organisation Science 1994; 2: 121-47.
8. Lewis LK, Seibold DR. Innovation modification during intraorganisational adoption. Academy of Management Review 1993; 18: 322-54.
9. Williams R, Edge D. The social shaping of technology. Research Policy 1996; 25: 865-99.
10. rd ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1977.
11. Simon HA. Administrative Behaviour. A study of decision-making processes in administrative organisation. 3rd ed. New York: Free Press; 1976.
12. Akrich M, User representations, practices, methods and sociology. In: Rip A, Misa TJ, Schot J, editors. Managing technology in society, the approach of constructive technology assessment. London: Pinter; 1995; pp. 205-24.
13. Barley SR. Technology as an occasion for structuring, evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly 1986; 31: 78-108.
14. Barley SR. The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Administrative Science Quarterly 1990; 35: 61-103.
15. Prasad P. Symbolic processes in the implementation of technological change, a symbolic interactionist study of work computerization. Academy of Management Journal 1993; 36: 1400-29.
16. Giddens A. The constitution of society, outline of the theory of structure. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press; 1984.
17. Hagendijk R. Structuration theory, constructivism, and scientific change. In: Cozzens S, Gieryn T, editors. Theories of science. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1991, pp. 43-67.
18. Orlikowski WJ. The duality of technology, rethinking the concept of technology in organisations. Organisation Science 1992; 3: 398-427.
19. Lehoux P, Sicotte C, Denis JL, Berg M, Lacroix A. Trust as a key component in the use of teleconsultation. Annals of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada 2000; 33: 482-7.
20. Sicotte C, Denis JL, Lehoux P, Champagne F. The computer based patient record, challenges towards timeless and spaceless medical practice. Journal of Medical Systems 1998; 22: 237-56.
21. Yin RK. Case study research, design and methods. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 1989.
22. Lehoux P, Sicotte C, Denis JL, Berg M, Lacroix A. The theory of use behind telemedicine, how compatible with physicians' clinical routines? Social Science & Medicine 2002; 54: 889-904.
23. Farand, L., Lafrance, J.-P., Arocha, J. Collaborative problem-solving in telemedicine and evidence-based reasoning in complex clinical cases. Int J Med Inf 1998; 51: 153-67.
24. Wootton R. Telemedicine, a cautious welcome. BMJ 1996; 313: 1375-7.