Association between method of delivery, puerperal complication rate and postpartum hysterectomy

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Volumn 272, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 43-47

  Simoes, Elisabeth ^a   Kunz, Siegfried ^b   Bosing Schwenkglenks, Margarete ^c   Schmahl, Friedrich W ^d  

^a Kompetenz Centrum Qualitatssicherung   (Germany)

^b Klinikum am Steinenberg   (Germany)

^c Zahngesund Baden Wurttemberg e V   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Caesarean delivery; Perinatal survey data; Postpartum hysterectomy; Puerperal complication

Indexed keywords

ANEMIA; ARTICLE; BIOSTATISTICS; BLEEDING; CESAREAN SECTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; ECLAMPSIA; FEMALE; FISHER EXACT TEST; GERMANY; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MANTEL HAENSZEL TEST; MATERNAL MORBIDITY; MATERNAL MORTALITY; MATERNAL WELFARE; PERINATAL PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREGNANCY; PUERPERIUM; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEPTICEMIA; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STUDENT T TEST; THIRD TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; VAGINAL DELIVERY; WOUND INFECTION;

CESAREAN SECTION; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; POSTPARTUM PERIOD; PREGNANCY; PUERPERAL DISORDERS; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 21244494848     PISSN: 09320067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-004-0692-0     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Engelsen I, Albechtsen S, Iversen O (2001) Peripartum hysterectomy incidence and maternal morbidity. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80:409-412
2. Erata YE, Kilic B, Güclü S, Saygili U, Uslu T (2002) Risk factors for pelvic surgery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 267:14-18
3. Flamm BL (2001) Vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC). Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 15:81-92
4. Gilliam M, Rosenberg D, Davis F (2002) The likelihood of placenta previa with greater number of caesarean deliveries and higher parity. Obstet Gynecol 99:976-980
5. Hildingsson I (2002) Few women wish to be delivered by caesarean section. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 109:618-623
6. Hung S, Morrison DR, Whittington LA, Beck Fein S (2002) Prepartum work, job characteristics, and risk of caesarean delivery. Birth 29:10-16
7. Johansen R, Newburn M (2001) Promoting normality in childbirth. Br Med J 323:1142-1143
8. Kacmar J, Bhimani L, Boyd M, Shah-Hosseini R, Peipert J (2003) Route of delivery as a risk factor for emergent peripartum hysterectomy: a case-control study. Obstet Gynecol 102:141-145
9. Knitza R, Eidenschink S, Fehervary P, Kolben M (2003) Die "Wunschsektio". Ergebnisse einer Umfrage unter den Gynäkologinnen und Gynäkologen Bayerns. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 63:255-259
10. Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Martin DP, Easterling TR (2000) Association between mode of delivery and maternal rehospitalization. JAMA 283:2411-2416
11. Matuszewski W, Rzempoluch J, Cieslar G (1987) Hysterektomie im Rahmen der Sectio caesarea. Zentralbl Gynakol 109:856-861
12. Minkoff H, Chervenak FA (2003) Elective primary caesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 348:946-950
13. Neumann U (2002) Schnittentbindungsrate und Kostenentwicklung in der Geburtsmedizin. XX. Niederrheinischer-west-fälischer Kongress für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Detmold, 5-6 Juli 2002. http://www.nwggg.de.
14. Paterson-Brown S (1998) Should doctors perform an elective caesarean section on request? BMJ 317:462-463
15. Petrou S, Henderson J, Glazener CMA (2001) Economic aspects of caesarean section and alternative modes of delivery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 15:145-163
16. Rageth JC, Juzi C, Grossenbacher H (1999) Death after previous caesarean: a risk evaluation. Obstet Gynecol 93:132-137
17. Rath W, Vetter K (2002) Der Kaiserschnitt zwischen Selbstbestimmungsrecht der Schwangeren, Mangel an gesichertem Wissen und ärztlicher Entscheidung. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 62:838-842
18. Schmutzler RK, Herlyn-Elger M, Rhiem K, Bücker-Nott H, Roemer VM (2003) Einstellung deutscher Gynäkologen und Gynäkologinnen zur Wunschsektio. Frauenarzt 44:632-636
19. Schneider H (2002) Die Wunschsectio - eine gleichwertige Alternative zur Spontangeburt? Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch 42:4-11
20. Schneider KTM (2002) Sectio nach Wunsch - muss man hinsichtlich der Morbiditätsrisiken umdenken? Gynakol Geburtshilfiche Rundsch 42:12-14
21. Signorelli C, Cattaruzza MS, Osborn JF (1995) Risk factors for caesarean section in Italy: results of a multicentre study. Public Health 109:191-199
22. Tranquili AL, Garzetti GG (1997) A new ethical and clinical dilemma in obstetric practice: cesarean section "on maternal request". Am J Obstet Gynecol 177:245-246