Origin of suppression of otoacoustic emissions evoked by two-tone bursts

Hearing Research

Volumn 235, Issue 1-2, 2008, Pages 80-89

  Jedrzejczak, W Wiktor ^a   Smurzynski, Jacek ^b   Blinowska, Katarzyna J ^c  

^a INSTITUTE OF PHYSIOLOGY AND PATHOLOGY OF HEARING   (Poland)

^b EAST TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

Author keywords

Adaptive approximations; Otoacoustic emissions; Time frequency distribution; Two tone suppression

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; NORMAL HUMAN; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SOUND INTENSITY; WAVEFORM;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; COCHLEA; HUMANS; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; REACTION TIME; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; TIME FACTORS; VIBRATION;

EID: 37549059129     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.10.005     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bian L., and Scherrer N.M. Low-frequency modulation of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122 (2007) 1681-1692
2. Blinowska K.J., and Durka P.J. The application of wavelet transform and matching pursuit to the time-varying EEG Signals. In: Dagli C.H., and Fernandez B.R. (Eds). Intelligent Engineering Systems through Artificial Neural Networks vol. 4 (1994), ASME, New York 535-540
3. Cooper N.P. Two-tone suppression in cochlear mechanics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99 (1996) 3087-3098
4. Glattke T.J., and Robinette M.S. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in populations with normal hearing sensitivity. In: Robinette M.S., and Glattke T.J. (Eds). Otoacoustic Emissions: Clinical Applications (2007), Thieme, New York 87-105
5. Harris F.P., and Glattke T.J. The use of suppression to determine the characteristics of otoacoustic emissions. Sem. Hear. 13 (1992) 67-80
6. Jedrzejczak W.W., Blinowska K.J., and Konopka W. Time-frequency analysis of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions of subjects exposed to noise. Hear. Res. 205 (2005) 249-255
7. Jedrzejczak W.W., Blinowska K.J., and Konopka W. Resonant modes in transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions and asymmetries between left and right ear. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119 (2006) 2226-2231
8. Jedrzejczak W.W., Blinowska K.J., Konopka W., Grzanka A., and Durka P.J. Identification of otoacoustic emissions components by means of adaptive approximations. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115 (2004) 2148-2158
9. Kittel M., Wagner E., and Klump G.M. An estimate of the auditory-filter bandwidth in the Mongolian gerbil. Hear. Res. 164 (2002) 69-76
10. Mallat S.G., and Zhang Z. Matching pursuit with time-frequency dictionaries. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 41 (1993) 3397-3415
11. Neely S.T., and Kim D.O. A model for active elements in cochlear biomechanics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 79 (1986) 1472-1480
12. Niemiec A., Yost W.A., and Shofner W.P. Behavioral measures of frequency selectivity in the chinchilla. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92 (1992) 2636-2649
13. Patterson R.D. A pulse ribbon model of monaural phase perception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82 (1987) 1560-1586
14. Probst R., Coats A.C., Martin G.K., and Lonsbury-Martin B.L. Spontaneous, click-, and toneburst-evoked otoacoustic emissions from normal ears. Hear. Res. 21 (1986) 261-275
15. Rhode W.S., and Recio A. Basilar-membrane response to multicomponent stimuli in chinchilla. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110 (2001) 981-994
16. Robles L., and Ruggero M.A. Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. Physiol. Rev. 81 (2001) 1305-1352
17. Russell I.J., and Nilsen K.E. The location of the cochlear amplifier: spatial representation of a single-tone on the guinea pig basilar membrane. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94 (1997) 2660-2664
18. Sachs M.B., and Kiang N.Y. Two-tone inhibition in auditory nerve fibers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 43 (1968) 1120-1128
19. Smurzynski J., and Probst R. The influence of disappearing and reappearing spontaneous otoacoustic emissions on one subject's threshold microstructure. Hear. Res. 115 (1998) 197-205
20. Souter M. Suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise. Hear. Res. 91 (1995) 167-177
21. Tavartkiladze G.A., Frolenkov G.I., Kruglov A.V., and Artamasov S.V. Ipsilateral suppression effects on transient evoked otoacoustic emission. Brit. J. Audiol. 28 (1994) 193-204
22. Uppenkamp S., Fobel S., and Patterson R.D. The effects of temporal asymmetry on the detection and perception of short chirps. Hear. Res. 158 (2001) 71-83
23. van der Heijden M. Cochlear gain control. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117 (2005) 1223-1233
24. Velenovsky D.S., and Glattke T.J. Suppression of otoacoustic emissions in populations with normal hearing sensitivity. In: Robinette M.S., and Glattke T.J. (Eds). Otoacoustic Emissions: Clinical Applications (2007), Thieme, New York 131-159
25. Xu L., Probst R., Harris F.P., and Roede J. Peripheral analysis of frequency in human ears revealed by tone burst evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 74 (1994) 173-180
26. Yoshikawa H., Smurzynski J., and Probst R. Suppression of tone burst evoked otoacoustic emissions in relation to frequency separation. Hear. Res. 148 (2000) 95-106