Visualizing feedback-enhanced contrast in magnetic resonance imaging

Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part A: Bridging Education and Research

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 378-393

  Huang, Susie Y ^a,b   Chung, Ava P ^a   Lin, Yung Ya ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b HARVARD MIT DIVISION OF HEALTH SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Contrast enhancement; Distant dipolar field; Feedback fields; Nonlinear Bloch equations; Radiation damping

Indexed keywords

EID: 37549043921     PISSN: 15466086     EISSN: 15525023     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cmr.a.20099     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Huang SY, Wolahan SM, Mathern GW, Chute DJ, Akhtari M, Nguyen ST, et al. 2006. Improving MRI differentiation of gray and white matter in epileptogenie lesions based on nonlinear feedback. Magn Reson Med 56:776-786.
2. Datta S, Huang SY, Lin YY. 2006. Contrast enhancement by feedback fields in magnetic resonance imag-ing. J Phys Chem B 110:22071-22078.
3. Bloembergen N, Pound RV. 1954. Radiation damping in magnetic resonance experiments. Phys Rev 95:8-12.
4. Deville G, Bernier M, Delrieux JM. 1979. NMR multiple echoes observed in solid He-3. Phys Rev B 19: 5666-5688.
5. Warren WS, Richter W, Andreotti AH, Farmer BT. 1993. Generation of impossible of cross-peaks between bulk water and biomolecules in solution NMR. Science 262:2005-2009.
6. Lin YY, Lisitza N, Ahn S, Warren WS. 2000. Resurrection of crushed magnetization and chaotic dynamics in solution NMR spectroscopy. Science 290:118-121.
7. Datta S, Huang SY, Lin YY. 2006. The transient dynamics leading to spin turbulence in high-field solution magnetic resonance: a numerical study. J Chem Phys 124:154501.
8. Huang SY, Lin YY, Lisitza N, Warren WS. 2002. Signal interferences from turbulent spin dynamics in solution nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Chem Phys 116:10325-10337.
9. Huang SY, Walls JD, Wang Y, Warren WS, Lin YY. 2004. Signal irreproducibility in high-field solution magnetic resonance experiments caused by spin turbulence. J Chem Phys 121:6105-6109.
10. Jeener J. 2002. Dynamical instabilities in liquid nuclear magnetic resonance experiments with large nuclear magnetization, with and without pulsed field gradients. J Chem Phys 116:8439-8446.
11. Warren WS, Hammes SL, Bates JL. 1989. Dynamics of radiation damping in nuclear magnetic-resonance. J Chem Phys 91:5895-5904.
12. Augustine MP. 2002. Transient properties of radiation damping. Prog NMR Spectrosc 40:111-150.
13. Huang SY, Anklin C, Walls JD, Lin YY. 2004. Sizable concentration- dependent frequency shifts in solution NMR using sensitive probes. J Am Chem Soc 126:15936-15937.
14. Huang SY, Furuyama JK, Lin YY. 2006. Designing feedback-based contrast enhancement for in vivo imaging. Magn Reson Mater Phys 19:333-346.
15. Levitt MH. 1996. Demagnetization field effects in two-dimensional solution NMR. Concepts Magn Reson 8: 77-103.
16. Richter W, Warren WS. 2000. Intermolecular multiple quantum coherences in liquids. Concepts Magn Reson 12:396-409.
17. Bouchard LS, Warren WS. 2004. Reconstruction of porous material geometry by stochastic optimization based on bulk NMR measurements of the dipolar field. J Magn Reson 170:299-309.
18. Marques JP, Bowtell R. 2005. Application of a Fourier-based method for rapid calculation of field inhomogeneity due to spatial variation of magnetic susceptibility. Concepts Magn Reson B 25:65-78.
19. Enss T, Ahn S, Warren WS. 1999. Visualizing the dipolar field in solution NMR and MR imaging: three-dimensional structure simulations. Chem Phys Lett 305:101-108.
20. Warren WS, Lee S, Richter W, Vathyam S. 1995. Correcting the classical dipolar demagnetizing field in solution NMR. Chem Phys Lett 247:207-214.
21. Datta S, Huang SY, Lin YY. 2006. Understanding spin turbulence in solution magnetic resonance through phase space dynamics and instability. 2006. Concepts Magn Reson A 28:410-421.
22. Warren WS, Ahn S, Mescher M, Garwood M, Ugurbil K, Richter W, et al. 1998. MR imaging contrast enhancement based on intermolecular zero quantum coherences. Science 281:247-251.
23. Zhong JH, Chen Z, Kwok E. 2000. In vivo intermolecular double-quantum imaging on a clinical 1.5 T MR scanner. Magn Reson Med 43:335-341.
24. Barros W, de Sousa PL, Engelsberg M. 2003. Low field intermolecular double-quantum coherence imaging via the Overhauser effect. J Magn Reson 165: 175-179.
25. Gueron M, Plateau P, Decorps M. 1991. Solvent signal suppression in NMR. Prog NMR Spectrosc 23:135-209.
26. Broekaert P, Jeener J. 1995. Suppression of radiation damping in NMR in liquids by active electronic feedback. J Magn Reson Ser A 113:60-64.
27. Louis-Joseph A, Abergel D, Lallemand JY. 1995. Neutralization of radiation damping by selective feedback on a 400-MHz NMR spectrometer. J Biomol NMR 5:212-216.
28. Abergel D, Louis-Joseph A, Lallemand JY. 1996. Amplification of radiation damping in a 600-MHz NMR spectrometer: application to the study of water-protein interactions. J Biomol NMR 8:15-22.
29. Faber C, Heil C, Zahneisen B, Balla DZ, Bowtell R. 2006. Sensitivity to local dipole fields in the CRAZED experiment: an approach to bright spot MRI. J Magn Reson 182:315-324.