Assessing the state space of the brain with fMRI: An integrative view of current methods

Pharmacopsychiatry

Volumn 40, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2007, Pages

  Schlosser R G M ^a   Koch, K ^a   Wagner, G ^a  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; BAYES THEOREM; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONFERENCE PAPER; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROMODULATION; PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES REGRESSION; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; WORKING MEMORY;

EID: 37549029155     PISSN: 01763679     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-992769     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (71)

1. Arnold M, Miltner WH, Witte H, Bauer R, Braun C. Adaptive AR modeling of nonstationary time series by means of Kalman filtering. IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering 1998; 45: 553-562
2. Astolfi L, Cincotti F, Mattia D et al. Estimation of the effective and functional human cortical connectivity with structural equation modeling and directed transfer function applied to high-resolution EEG. Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 22: 1457-1470
3. Aström KJ, Wittenmark B. Adaptive control. Rading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company 1995
4. Basar-Eroglu C, Brand A, Hildebrandt H et al. Working memory related gamma oscillations in schizophrenia patients. Int J Psychophysiol 2007; 64: 39-45
5. Bender W, Albus M, Moller HJ, Tretter F. Towards systemic theories in biological psychiatry. Pharmacopsychiatry 2006; 39 Suppl 1: S4-S9
6. Bhattacharya S, Ringo Ho MH, Purkayastha S. A Bayesian approach to modeling dynamic effective connectivity with fMRI data. Neuroimage 2006; 30: 794-812
7. Boomsma A, Hoogland JJ. The robustness of LISREL modeling revisited. In: Cudeck R, du Toit S, Sörbom D eds, Structural Equation Modeling: Present and Future. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International 2001; 139-168
8. Brogan WL. Modern control theory. 3 ed. Upper Saddle River. NJ: Prentice Hall 1991
9. Buchel C, Friston KJ. Modulation of connectivity in visual pathways by attention: cortical interactions evaluated with structural equation modelling and fMRI. Cereb Cortex 1997; 7: 768-778
10. Buchel C, Friston KJ. Dynamic changes in effective connectivity characterized by variable parameter regression and Kalman filtering. Hum Brain Mapp 1998; 6: 403-408
11. Bullmore E, Horwitz B, Honey G et al. How good is good enough in path analysis of fMRI data? Neuroimage 2000; 11: 289-301
12. Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2001
13. Carmeli C, Knyazeva MG, Innocenti GM, Feo O De. Assessment of EEG synchronization based on state-space analysis. Neuroimage 2005; 25: 339-354
14. Chatfield C. The analysis of time series: An introduction. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC 2004
15. Cordes D, Haughton VM, Arfanakis K et al. Mapping functionally related regions of brain with functional connectivity MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21: 1636-1644
16. Deco G. A dynamical model of event-related FMRI signals in prefrontal cortex: predictions for schizophrenia. Pharmacopsychiatry 2006; 39 Suppl 1: S65-S67
17. Dempster AP, Laird NM. Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J Roy Statist Soc B 1977; 39: 1-38
18. Doya K, Ishii S, Pouget A Bayesian Brain: Probabilistic Approaches to Neural Coding MIT Press 2007
19. Eliasmith C, Anderson CH. Neural Engineering. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press 2003
20. Etkin A, Egner T, Peraza DM, Kandel ER, Hirsch J. Resolving emotional conflict: A role for the rostral anterior cingulate cortex in modulating activity in the amygdala. Neuron 2006; 51: 871-882
21. Fell J, Fernandez G, Klaver P, Elger CE, Fries P. Is synchronized neuronal gamma activity relevant for selective attention? Brain Res Brain Res Rev 2003; 42: 265-272
22. Friman O, Farneback G, Westin CF. A Bayesian approach for stochastic white matter tractography. IEEE transactions on medical imaging 2006; 25: 965-978
23. Friston K. A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London 2005; 360: 815-836
24. Friston KJ, Harrison L, Penny W. Dynamic causal modelling. Neuroimage 2003; 19: 1273-1302
25. Gallinat J, Heinz A. Combination of multimodal imaging and molecular genetic information to investigate complex psychiatric disorders. Pharmacopsychiatry 2006; 39 Suppl 1: S76-S79
26. Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB. Bayesian data analysis. Boca Raton: Cahpman & Hall 2003
27. Gerstner W. Kistler w, Spiking Neuron Models: Single Neurons, Populations, Plasticity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2002
28. Geweke J. Measurement of linear dependence and feedback between multiple time series. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1982; 77: 304-313
29. Goebel R, Roebroeck A, Kim DS, Formisano E. Investigating directed cortical interactions in time-resolved fMRI data using vector autoregressive modeling and Granger causality mapping. Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 21: 1251-1261
30. Gossl C, Fahrmeir L, Putz B, Auer LM, Auer DP. Fiber tracking from DTI using linear state space models: detectability of the pyramidal tract. Neuroimage 2002; 16: 378-388
31. Granger CWJ. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 1969; 37: 424-438
32. Grewal MS, Andrews AP Kalman Filtering: Theory and practice using MATLAB: Wiley-Interscience 2001
33. Haavisto O, Hyotyniemi H, Roos C. State space modeling of yeast gene expression dynamics. Journal of bioinformatics and computational biology 2007; 5: 31-46
34. Harrison L, Penny WD, Friston K. Multivariate autoregressive modeling of fMRI time series. Neuroimage 2003; 19: 1477-1491
35. Ho RM, Ombao H, Shumway R. A state-space approach to modeling brain dynamics. Statistica Sinica 2005; 15: 407-425
36. Honey G, Fu C, Kim J et al. Effects of verbal working memory load on corticocortical connectivity modeled by path analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data. Neuroimage 2002; 17: 573-582
37. Honey GD, Suckling J, Zelaya F et al. Dopaminergic drug effects on physiological connectivity in a human cortico-striato-thalamic system. Brain 2003; 126: 1767-1781
38. Horwitz B, MacIntosh AR, Haxby JV, Grady CL. Network analysis of brain cognitive function using metabolic and blood flow data. Behav Brain Res 1995; 66: 187-193
39. Hyvärinen A, Karhunen J, Oja E. Independent component analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc 2001
40. Kalman RE. A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Trans of the ASME - Journal of Basic Engineering 1960; 35-45
41. Kaminski M, Ding M, Truccolo WA, Bressler SL. Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance. Biological cybernetics 2001; 85: 145-157
42. Kim J, Zhu W, Chang L, Bentler PM, Ernst T. Unified structural equation modeling approach for the analysis of multisubject, multivariate functional MRI data. Hum Brain Mapp 2006
43. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling 2nd ed. New York: The Guilford Press 2005
44. Kobayashi R, Shinomoto S. State space method for predicting the spike times of a neuron. Physical review 2007; 75: 011925
45. Koch C, Hepp K. Quantum mechanics in the brain. Nature 2006; 440: 611
46. Koechlin E, Ody C, Kouneiher F. The architecture of cognitive control in the human prefrontal cortex. Science 2003; 302: 1181-1185
47. Lathi BP. Linear Systems and Signals 2 ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2005
48. Ljung L. System identification: Theory for the User 2nd edition ed. London: Prentice Hall 1999
49. MacArdle J. Causal modeling applied to psychonomic systems simulation. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation 1980; 12: 193-209
50. MacIntosh AR, Bookstein FL, Haxby JV, Grady CL. Spatial pattern analysis of functional brain images using partial least squares. Neuroimage 1996; 3: 143-157
51. MacIntosh AR, Grady CL, Ungerleider LG et al. Network analysis of cortical visual pathways mapped with PET. J Neurosci 1994; 14: 655-666
52. Mechelli A, Price CJ, Noppeney U, Friston KJ. A dynamic causal modeling study on category effects: bottom-up or top-down mediation? J Cogn Neurosci 2003; 15: 925-934
53. Musso F, Konrad A, Vucurevic G et al. Distributed BOLD-response in association cortex vector state space predicts reaction time during selective attention. Neuroimage 2006; 29: 1311-1318
54. Noppeney U, Josephs O, Hocking J, Price CJ, Friston KJ. The effect of prior visual information on recognition of speech and sounds. Cereb Cortex 2007
55. Paulus MP, Frank L, Brown GG, Braff DL. Schizophrenia subjects show intact success-related neural activation but impaired uncertainty processing during decision-making. Neuropsychopharmacology 2003; 28: 795-806
56. Penny WD, Stephan KE, Mechelli A, Friston KJ. Modelling functional integration: a comparison of structural equation and dynamic causal models. Neuroimage 2004; 23 Suppl 1: S264-S274
57. Petrides M. Mapping prefrontal cortical systems for the control of cognition. In: Toga A, Mazziotta JC eds, Brain mapping: the systems. San Diego: Academic Press 2000; 157-176
58. Posner MI. Chronometric Explorations of Mind. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1978
59. Rao RPN. Neural models of Bayesian belief propagation. In: Doya K, Ishii S, Pouget A, Rao RPN eds, Bayesian Brain: Probabilistic Approaches to Neural Coding Cambridge. MA: MIT Press 2007; 235-264
60. Roebroeck A, Formisano E, Goebel R. Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI. Neuroimage 2005; 25: 230-242
61. Sato JR, Junior EA, Takahashi DY et al. A method to produce evolving functional connectivity maps during the course of an fMRI experiment using wavelet-based time-varying Granger causality. Neuroimage 2006
62. Schild D. Coordination of neuronal signals as structures in state space. The International journal of neuroscience 1984; 22: 283-297
63. Schlösser R, Gesierich T, Kaufmann B et al. Altered effective connectivity during working memory performance in schizophrenia: a study with fMRI and structural equation modeling. Neuroimage 2003; 19: 751-763
64. Schlösser R, Gesierich T, Kaufmann B, Vucurevic G, Stoeter P. Altered effective connectivity in drug free schizophrenic patients. Neuroreport 2003; 14: 2233-2237
65. Steele JD, Meyer M, Ebmeier KP. Neural predictive error signal correlates with depressive illness severity in a game paradigm. Neuroimage 2004; 23: 269-280
66. Summerfield C, Egner T, Greene M et al. Predictive codes for forthcoming perception in the frontal cortex. Science 2006; 314: 1311-1314
67. Toni I, Rowe J, Stephan KE, Passingham RE. Changes of cortico-striatal effective connectivity during visuomotor learning. Cereb Cortex 2002; 12: 1040-1047
68. Heijden F van der, Duin R, Ridder D de, Tax DMJ. Classification, Parameter Estimation and State Estimation: An Engineering Approach Using MATLAB. New York: John Wiley & Sons 2004
69. Winterhalder M, Schelter B, Hesse W et al. Detection of directed information flow in biosignals. Biomedizinische Technik 2006; 51: 281-287
70. Wright JJ, Kydd RR, Lees GJ. State-changes in the brain viewed as linear steady-states and non-linear transitions between steady-states. Biological cybernetics 1985; 53: 11-17
71. Zhan Y, Halliday D, Jiang P, Liu X, Feng J. Detecting time-dependent coherence between non-stationary electrophysiological signals-A combined statistical and time-frequency approach. Journal of neuroscience methods 2006