Eliciting situated knowledges about new technologies

Public Understanding of Science

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 105-119

  Scott, Anne ^a   Du Plessis, Rosemary ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 37449030172     PISSN: 09636625     EISSN: 13616609     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0963662506068499     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Barr, J. and Birke, L. (1998) Common Science? Women, Science, and Knowledge. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
2. Becker, H. (1998) Tricks of the Trade: How to Think About Your Research While You're Doing It. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Bielawki, E. (1996) " Inuit Indigenous Knowledge and Science in the Arctic, " in L. Nader (ed.) Naked Science: Anthropological Inquiry into Boundaries, Power and Knowledge, pp. 216 - 27. London: Routledge.
4. Brougham, A.E. and Reed, A.W. (1963) The Reed Book of Mori Proverbs: Te Kohikohinga Whakatauk a Reed. Auckland: Reed.
5. Bunton, R. and Petersen, A. (2005) " Genetics and Governance: an Introduction, " in R. Bunton and A. Petersen (eds) Genetic Governance: Health, Risk and Ethics in the Biotech Era, pp. 1 - 27. London: Routledge.
6. Claeson, B., Martin, E., Richardson, W., Schoch-Spana, M. and Taussig, K. (1996) " Scientific Literacy: What It Is, Why It's Important, and Why Scientists Think We Don't Have It, " in L. Nader (ed.) Naked Science: Anthropological Inquiry into Boundaries, Power and Knowledge, pp. 101 - 16. London: Routledge.
7. Collins, P. Hill (1990) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment. London: Routledge.
8. Cram, F., Phillips, H., Tipene-Matua, B., Parsons, M. and Taupo, K. (2004) " A 'Parallel Process'? Beginning a Constructive Conversation about a Mori Methodology," Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 1 (1). 14 - 19.
9. Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1988 [ 1980 ]) A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, translation and foreword by B. Massumi. London: Athlone.
10. Department of Health (2003) Our Inheritance, Our Future: Realising the Potential of Genetics in the NHS. London: The Stationery Office.
11. Dryzek, J. (2000) Deliberative Democracy: Liberals, Critics and Contestations. New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Du Plessis, R., Scott, A., Phillips, H., Cram, F., Tipene-Matua, B., Parsons, M. and Taupo, T. (2004) " The Social, Cultural, Ethical and Spiritual Implications of Genetic Testing: Preliminary Findings, " Constructive Conversations/Krero Whakaaetanga Research Report No. 3. URL: http://www.conversations.canterbury.ac.nz/reportspapers.htm
13. Forgie, V., Cheyne, C. and McDermott, P. (1999) Democracy in New Zealand Local Government: Purpose and Practice. Palmerston North: School of Resources and Environmental Planning, Massey University.
14. Fortun, K. (1998) " The Bhopal Disaster: Advocacy and Expertise, " Science as Culture 7 (2). 193 - 216.
15. Fung, A. and Wright, E.O. (2003) Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. London: Verso.
16. Glasner, P. (2001) " Rights and Rituals: Why Juries Can Do More Harm than Good, " in M. Pimbert and T. Wakeford (eds) Deliberative Democracy and Citizen Empowerment. Participatory Learning and Action Notes, vol. 40 (February) (Special Issue). pp. 43 - 5. London: International Institute for Environmental Development.
17. Goven, J. (2002) " Citizens and Deficits: Problematic Paths toward Participatory Technology Assessment, " URL: http://www.ifz.tugraz.at/ index_en.php/filemanager/download/125/goven.pdf (accessed 29 June 2006 ).
18. Goven, J. (2003) " Deploying the Consensus Conference in New Zealand: Democracy, and De-problematisation, " Public Understanding of Science 12(4). 421-38.
19. Grassie, B. (1995) " Quaker Epistemology: Towards a Friendly Philosophy, " Presentation to The Friends Association for Higher Education, Haverford College, June.
20. Gusterson, H. (2000) " How Not to Construct a Radioactive Waste Incinerator, " Science, Technology and Human Values 25 (3). 332 - 51.
21. Haraway, D. (1991) " Situated Knowledges: the Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective " in D. Haraway, Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, pp. 183 - 202. New York: Routledge.
22. Haraway, D. (1997) Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan©_Meets_ OncoMouse™: Feminism and Technoscience. London: Routledge.
23. Harding, S. (1996) " Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What is 'Strong Objectivity'?, " in E. Fox Keller and H. Longino (eds) Feminism and Science, pp. 235 - 48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Harding, S. (1998) Is Science Multi-cultural? Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and Epistemologies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
25. Harding, S. (2000) " Democratising Philosophy of Science for Local Knowledge Movements: Issues and Challenges, " Gender, Technology and Development 4 (1). 1 - 23.
26. Heldke, L. (1988) " Recipes for Theory Making, " Hypatia 3 (2). 15 - 29.
27. Hipkins, R. (2004) " Methodological Overview: The Development and Implementation of the Constructive Conversations/Krero Whakaaetanga Contact Group Methodology, " Constructive Conversations/Krero Whakaaetanga Research Report No. 1. URL: http://www.conversations.canterbury.ac.nz/reportspapers.htm
28. Independent Biotechnology Advisory Council (2002) Genetic Testing: An Introduction to the Technology that is Changing our Lives. Wellington: Independent Biotechnology Advisory Council.
29. Irwin, A. (2001) " Constructing the Scientific Citizen: Science and Democracy in the Biosciences, " Public Understanding of Science 10: 1 - 18.
30. Irwin, A. and Michael, M. (2003) Science, Social Theory and Public Knowledge. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
31. Irwin, A. and Wynne, B., eds (1996) Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Jantzen, G. (1999) " Genetic Engineering and the Quaker Testimonies " in Sowle Press and Bedfordshire General Meeting (eds) Inventing Heaven? Quakers Confront the Challenges of Genetic Engineering, pp. 15 - 20. Reading: The Sowle Press.
33. Javitt, G.H., Stanley, E. and Hudson, K. (2004) " Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests, Government Oversight, and the First Amendment: What the Government Can Do (and Can't) Do to Protect the Public's Health, " Oklahoma Law Review 57 (2). 251 - 302.
34. Kerr, A. (1998) " Toward a Feminist Natural Science: Linking Theory and Practice, " Women's Studies International Forum 21 (1). 95 - 109.
35. Kerr, A. (2004) Genetics and Society: A Sociology of Disease. London and New York: Routledge.
36. Kitzinger, J. (1994) " The Methodology of Focus Groups: the Importance of Interaction between Research Participants, " Sociology of Health and Illness 16 (1). 103 - 21.
37. Konrad, M. (2005) Narrating the New Predictive Genetics: Ethics, Ethnography and Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Kuletz, V. (2001) " Feminist Science Studies, Objectivity, and the Politics of Vision, " in M. Mayberry, B. Subramaniam and L. Weasel (eds) Feminist Science Studies: A New Generation, pp. 321 - 38. New York: Routledge.
39. Metge, J. (2001) Krero Tahi Talking Together. Auckland: Auckland University Press.
40. Molina, J. (2004) " Balancing Risks: The Framing of Human Genetics in Online News Media, " Constructive Conversations/Krero Whakaaetanga Research Report No. 5. URL: http://www.conversations.canterbury.ac.nz/ reportspapers.htm
41. National Advisory Committee on Health and Disability (2003) Molecular Genetic Testing in New Zealand. Wellington: National Advisory Committee on Health and Disability. URL: http://www.nhc.govt.nz/publications/Genetics/ GenetictestingNZ.pdf
42. NZ Ministry of Health (2004) Review of the Regulation of Human Tissue and Tissue-based Therapies. URL: http://www.moh.govt.nz/moh.nsf/wpg_Index/- Human+Tissue+Consultation
43. Petersen, A. (2005) " Securing our Genetic Health: Engendering Trust in UK Biobank, " Sociology of Health and Illness 27 (2). 272 - 92.
44. Petersen, A. and Bunton, R. (2002) The New Genetics and the Public's Health. London and New York: Routledge.
45. Raffles, R. (2002) " Intimate Knowledge, " International Social Science Journal 173: 325 - 35.
46. Scott, A. and Tipene-Matua, B. (2004) " Cultural Conflict and New Biotechnologies: What is at Risk?, " in K. Dew and R. Fitzgerald (eds) Challenging Science, pp. 126 - 45. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.
47. Scott, A., Phillips, H., Moore, A. and Du Plessis, R. (2005) " Ethics in Practice: Conversations about Biobanks, " Critical Public Health 15 (4). 359 - 68.
48. Smith, L. Tuhiwai (1999) Decolonising Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. Dunedin: University of Otago.
49. Tesh, S. (2000) Uncertain Hazards: Environmental Activists and Scientific Proof. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
50. Tipene-Matua, B., Phillips, H., Cram, F., Parsons, M. and Taupo, T. (2005) " Old Ways of Having New Conversations: Using Tikanga Mori Based Research Methods to Discuss Genetic Testing," Unpublished paper, submitted to Alternative, an academic journal of Nga Pae o te Maramatanga, University of Auckland.
51. Verran, H. (2002) " A Postcolonial Moment in Science Studies: Alternative Firing Regimes of Environmental Scientists and Aboriginal Landowners, " Social Studies of Science 32 (5 - 6). 729 - 62.
52. Warner, M. (2002) Publics and Counterpublics. New York: Zone Books.
53. Wynne, B. (1992) " Misunderstood Misunderstanding: Social Identities and Public Uptake of Science, " Public Understanding of Science 1: 281 - 304.
54. Wynne, B. (2004) " Expanding from Risk to Bioethics in Public Discourse of New Genetics-Frying Pan to Fire?, " Keynote address, presented at the Technologies, Publics and Power Conference, Akaroa, 1-5 February.