Which side of the coin? The regional governance of science and innovation

Regional Studies

Volumn 41, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1115-1127

  Koschatzky, Knut ^a   Kroll, Henning ^a  

^a FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS AND INNOVATION RESEARCH ISI   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bremen; Federal system; Multi level governance; Regional governance; Science policy; Strategic intelligence

Indexed keywords

GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INNOVATION; REGIONALIZATION; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; STRATEGIC APPROACH; TECHNOLOGY POLICY;

CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; GERMANY;

EID: 37349122792     PISSN: 00343404     EISSN: 13600591     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00343400701530857     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Arbeitnehmerkammer Bremen (2004) Statistisches Taschenbuch 2005. Wirtschafts-, Arbeits- und Sozialstatistik, Arbeitnehmerkammer, Bremen
2. Asheim, B. T. and Gertler, M. S. (2005) The geography of innovation: regional innovation systems. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, pp. 291-317. Oxford University Press, New York
3. Benz, A. and Eberlein, B. (1999) The Europeanization of regional policies: Patterns of multi-level governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 6, pp. 32-48.
4. BMBF (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung) (2005) Forschungs und Innovation in Deutschland 2005, BMBF, Bonn, Berlin
5. Braczyk, H. -J. and Heidenreich, M. (1998) Regional governance structures in a globalized world. Regional Innovation Systems. The Role of Governance in a Globalized World, pp. 414-440. UCL Press, London
6. Bunnell, T. G. and Coe, N. M. (2001) Spaces and scales of innovation. Progress in Human Geography, 25, pp. 569-589.
7. Charles, D., Perry, B. and Benneworth, P. (2004) Towards a Multi-Level Science Policy: Regional Science Policy in a European Context, Regional Studies Association, Seaford
8. Cole, A. and Loughlin, J. (2003) Beyond the unitary state? Public opinion, political institutions and public policy in Brittany. Regional Studies, 37, pp. 265-276.
9. Commission on Global Governance (1995) Our Global Neighborhood: The Report of the Commission on Global Governance, Oxford University Press, Oxford
10. Cooke, P. (2001) Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, pp. 945-974.
11. Cooke, P. (2002) Knowledge Economies: Clusters, Learning and Cooperative Advantage, Routledge, London
12. Cooke, P. (2002) Regional innovation systems: General findings and some new evidence from biotechnology clusters. Journal of Technology Transfer, 27, pp. 133-145.
13. Cooke, P., Boekholt, P. and Tädtling, F. (2000) The Governance of Innovation in Europe: Regional Perspectives on Global Competitiveness, Pinter, London
14. Cooke, P., Braczyk, H. -J. and Heidenreich, M. (2004) Regional Innovation Systems: The Role of Governance in a Globalized World, UCL, London
15. Cooke, P., Roper, S. and Wylie, P. (2003) 'The Golden Thread of Innovation' and Northern Ireland's evolving regional innovation system. Regional Studies, 37, pp. 365-379.
16. Crespy, C., Héraud, J. -A. and Perry, B. (2007) Multi-level governance, regions and science in France: Between competition and equality. Regional Studies, 41, pp. 1069-1084.
17. Deutscher Bundestag (2004) Unterrichtung durch die Bundesregierung. Dreiunddreißigster Rahmenplan der Gemeinschaftsaufgabe 'Verbesserung der regionalen Wirtschaftsstruktur' (GA) für den Zeitraum 2004 bis 2007, Deutscher Bundestag, Berlin
18. Döring, T. (2005) Räumliche Aspekte von Föderalismus und Finanzausgleich-von der Allokations- und Verteilungs- zur Wachstumsperspektive. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 63, pp. 109-122.
19. Edquist, C. (2005) Systems of innovation: Perspectives and challenges. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, pp. 181-208. Oxford University Press, New York
20. Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (2000) The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and 'Mode 2' to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, pp. 109-123.
21. European Commission (2001) The Regional Dimension of the European Research Area, European Commission (COM (2001) 549 final, Brussels
22. European Commission (2004) A New Partnership for Cohesion: Convergence, Competitiveness, Cooperation, European Communities, Luxembourg
23. European Commission (2005) Building the ERA of Knowledge for Growth, European Commission (COM (2005) 118 final, Brussels
24. Free Hanseatic City of Bremen (2004) InnoVision 2010: Bremen's Innovation Programme, Senator for Economic Affairs and Ports, Bremen
25. Fürst, D. (2001) Regional governance-ein neues Paradigma der Regionalwissenschaften?. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 59, pp. 370-380.
26. Fürst, D. (2006) The role of experimental regionalism in rescaling the German state. European Planning Studies, 14, pp. 923-938.
27. Fürst, D. and Kilper, H. (2005) Räumliche Aspekte des föderativen Systems-eine Einführung. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 63, pp. 89-98.
28. Giodarno, B. and Roller, E. (2003) A comparison of city region dynamics in the UK, Spain and Italy: More similarities than differences?. Regional Studies, 37, pp. 911-927.
29. Gönner, T. (2004) Das Parlament stärken, den Föderalismus reformieren. Die politische Meinung, 410, pp. 15-18.
30. Héraud, J. -A. and Koschatzky, K. (2006) Governance II: Regions, universities, and excellence in Europe. Regions, 263, pp. 8-9.
31. Iammarino, S. (2005) An evolutionary integrated view of regional systems of innovation: Concepts, measures and historical perspectives. European Planning Studies, 13, pp. 497-519.
32. Jones, M., Goodwin, M. and Jones, R. (2005) State modernization, devolution and economic governance: An introduction and guide to debate. Regional Studies, 39, pp. 397-404.
33. Kitagawa, F. (2007) The regionalization of science and innovation governance in Japan?. Regional Studies, 41, pp. 1099-1114.
34. Kohler-Koch, B. (1996) The strength of weakness: The transformation of governance in the EU. The Future of the Nation State, pp. 169-210. Nerius & Santerus, Stockholm
35. Kline, S. J. and Rosenberg, N. (1986) An overview of innovation. The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, pp. 275-305. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
36. Koschatzky, K. (2002) Regionsorientierte Innovationspolitik und innovationsorientierte Regionalpolitik: Zwei Wege in die gleiche Richtung?. Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung. Seminarberichte, 44, pp. 7-30.
37. Koschatzky, K. (2004) ERAWATCH Prototyping Phase, ESTO Study No. 2: Analysis on the Regional Dimensions of the 3% Action Plan. Regional Report Bremen, IPTC, Seville
38. Koschatzky, K. (2005) The regionalization of innovation policy: New options for regional change?. Rethinking Regional Innovation: Path Dependency or Regional Breakthrough?, pp. 291-312. Springer, New York
39. Koschatzky, K. (2005) Foresight as a governance concept at the interface between global challenges and regional innovation potentials. European Planning Studies, 13, pp. 619-639.
40. Koschatzky, K., Jappe, A., Hemer, J. and Wolf, B. (2004) Technologietrends und regionale Entwicklungspotenziale in den bremischen Innovationsfeldern, Fraunhofer ISI, Karlsruhe
41. Kuhlmann, S. (2001) Future governance of innovation policy in Europe-three scenarios. Research Policy, 30, pp. 953-976.
42. Kuhlmann, S. (2002) Governance and Intelligence in Research and Innovation Systems, Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht
43. Kulicke, M. (2006) EXIST - Existenzgründungen aus Hochschulen. Bericht der wissenschaftlichen Begleitung zum Förderzeitraum 1998 bis 2005, IRB-Verlag, Stuttgart
44. Lyall, C. and Tait, J. (2004) Foresight in a multi-level governance structure: Policy integration and communication. Science and Public Policy, 31, pp. 27-37.
45. Meyer-Krahmer, F. (1989) Der Einfluss staatlicher Technologiepolitik auf industrielle Innovationen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden
46. Meyer-Krahmer, F. (1997) Technologiepolitik. Handbuch zur Arbeitslehre, Oldenbourg, Munich
47. Nauwelaers, C. (2000) Policy learning for innovation in European regions. Paper presented at the RESTPOR Conference Kashikojima, Kashikojima, Japan
48. Nauwelaers, C. and Wintjes, R. (2003) Towards a new paradigm for innovation policy?. Regional Innovation Policy for Small-Medium Enterprises, pp. 193-220. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
49. Nauwelaers, C. and Wintjes, R. (2005) ERAWATCH Prototyping Phase. ESTO Study No. 2 - Analysis on the Regional Dimensions of the 3% Action Plan, MERIT, University of Maastricht, Maastricht
50. Oughton, C., Landabaso, M. and Morgan, K. (2002) The regional innovation paradox: Innovation policy and industrial policy. Journal of Technology Transfer, 27, pp. 97-110.
51. Perry, B. (2007) The multi-level governance of science policy in England. Regional Studies, 41, pp. 1051-1067.
52. Perry, B. and May, T. (2007) Governance, science policy and regions: An introduction. Regional Studies, 41, pp. 1039-1050.
53. Pohl, M. and Sünner, I. (2001) Die Neuregelung des bundesstaatlichen Finanzausgleichs. Wirtschaftspolitische Bedeutung für Bremen. BAW Monatsbericht, BAW Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Bremen
54. Salazar, M. and Holbrook, A. (2007) Canadian science, technology and innovation policy: The product of regional networking?. Regional Studies, 41, pp. 1129-1141.
55. Sotarauta, M. and Kautonen, M. (2007) Co-evolution of the Finnish national and local innovation and science arenas: Towards a dynamic understanding of multi-level governance. Regional Studies, 41, pp. 1085-1098.
56. Stenke, G. and Willms, W. (2004) Innovationsbericht 2003. Benchmarkanalysen zu FuE-Potenzialen und Innovation im Land Bremen. BAW Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Bremen
57. Swyngedouw, E. (2004) Globalisation or 'glocalisation'? Networks, territories and re-scaling. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 17, pp. 25-48.
58. Timm, J. and Gundrum, U. (2005) Der Technologiebeauftragte des Senats der Freien Hansestadt Bremen. Bericht des Technologiebeauftragten, Bremen
59. Tödtling, F. and Trippl, M. (2005) One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34, pp. 1203-1219.
60. Willms, W. (2003) Technologiepark Universität Bremen: Ergebnisse der Unternehmensbefragung 2002. BAW Monatsbericht, pp. 1-12.