Standards and innovations in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease;Standards und innovationen in der diagnostik der gastroösophagealen refluxkrankheit

Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie

Volumn 45, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 1141-1149

  Weigt, J ^a   Monkemuller K ^a   Kolfenbach, S ^a   Malfertheiner, Peter ^a,b  

^a OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MAGDEBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bilitec; Bravo MII pH; Endoscopy; GERD; Impedance; MII pH; pH metry

Indexed keywords

CHROMOENDOSCOPY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; ENDOSCOPY; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; HUMAN; IMAGING; IMPEDANCE; MAGNIFICATION RADIOGRAPHY; MANOMETRY; PH MEASUREMENT; REVIEW; STANDARDIZATION;

ENDOSCOPY, GASTROINTESTINAL; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; GERMANY; HUMANS; ION-SELECTIVE ELECTRODES; MANOMETRY; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC;

EID: 37349119820     PISSN: 00442771     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-963631     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Mönkemüller K, Malfertheiner P. Is non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) an inflammatory condition? CML Gastroenterology 2006; 25: 81-87
2. Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P et al. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 1900-1920; quiz 1943
3. Sifrim D, Blondeau K. New techniques to evaluate esophageal function. Dig Dis 2006; 24: 243-251
4. Fass R. Distinct phenotypic presentations of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a new view of the natural history. Dig Dis 2004; 22: 100-107
5. Savary M, Miller G. L'oesophage. Manuel et atlas d'endoscopie 1977: 80-92
6. Armstrong D, Emde C, Inauen W et al. Diagnostic assessment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: what is possible vs. what is practical? Hepatogastroenterology 1992; 39 Suppl 1: 3-13
7. Lundell LR, Dent J, Bennett JR et al. Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification. Gut 1999; 45: 172-180
8. Labenz J, Nocon M, Lind T et al. Prospective follow-up data from the ProGERD study suggest that GERD is not a categorial disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 2457-2462
9. Sharma P, Dent J, Armstrong D et al. The development and validation of an endoscopic grading system for Barrett's esophagus: the Prague C & M criteria. Gastroenterology 2006; 131: 1392-1399
10. Kiesslich R, Kanzler S, Vieth M et al. Minimal change esophagitis: prospective comparison of endoscopic and histological markers between patients with non-erosive reflux disease and normal controls using magnifying endoscopy. Dig Dis 2004; 22: 221-227
11. Yoshikawa I, Yamasaki M, Yamasaki T et al. Lugol chromoendoscopy as a diagnostic tool in so-called endoscopy-negative GERD. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 698-703
12. Coenraad M, Masclee AA, Straathof JW et al. Is Barrett's esophagus characterized by more pronounced acid reflux than severe esophagitis? Am J Gastroenterol 1998; 93: 1068-1072
13. Koek GH, Tack J, Sifrim D et al. The role of acid and duodenal gastroesophageal reflux in symptomatic GERD. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 2033-2040
14. Masclee AA, de Best AC, de Graaf R et al. Ambulatory 24-hour pH-metry in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Determination of criteria and relation to endoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol 1990; 25: 225-230
15. Smith JL, Opekun AR, Larkai E et al. Sensitivity of the esophageal mucosa to pH in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology 1989; 96: 683-689
16. Jamieson JR, Stein HJ, DeMeester TR et al. Ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring: normal values, optimal thresholds, specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility. Am J Gastroenterol 1992; 87: 1102-1111
17. Pehl C, Keller J, Merio R et al. Esophageal 24 hour-pH metry. Recommendations of the German Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility and the Study Group for Gastrointestinal Functional Disorders and Function Diagnostics of the Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. Z Gastroenterol 2003; 41: 545-556
18. Johnson LF, DeMeester TR. Development of the 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring composite scoring system. J Clin Gastroenterol 1986; 8 Suppl 1: 52-58
19. Mainie I, Tutuian R, Castell DO. Comparison between the combined analysis and the DeMeester Score to predict response to PPI therapy. J Clin Gastroenterol 2006; 40: 602-605
20. Taghavi SA, Ghasedi M, Saberi-Firoozi M et al. Symptom association probability and symptom sensitivity index: preferable but still suboptimal predictors of response to high dose omeprazole. Gut 2005; 54: 1067-1071
21. Weusten BL, Roelofs JM, Akkermans LM et al. The symptom-association probability: an improved method for symptom analysis of 24-hour esophageal pH data. Gastroenterology 1994; 107: 1741-1745
22. Emde C, Cilluffo T, Bauerfeind P et al. Combined esophageal and gastric pH-metry in healthy volunteers. Influence of cable through LES and effect of misoprostol. Dig Dis Sci 1989; 34: 79-82
23. Baldi F, Longanesi A, Ferrarini F. Esophageal and gastric acidity determination: its value and limitations. Minerva Chir 1991; 46: 77-81
24. Jacob P, Kahrilas PJ, Herzon G. Proximal esophageal pH-metry in patients with "reflux laryngitis". Gastroenterology 1991; 100: 305-310
25. Issing WJ, Karkos PD, Perreas K et al. Dual-probe 24-hour ambulatory pH monitoring for diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux. J Laryngol Otol 2004; 118: 845-848
26. Weusten BL, Akkermans LM, vanBerge-Henegouwen GP et al. Dynamic characteristic of gastro-oesophageal reflux in ambulatory patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and normal control subjects. Scand J Gastroenterol 1995; 30: 731-737
27. Jung B, Steinbach J, Beaumont C et al. Lack of association between esophageal acid sensitivity detected by prolonged pH monitoring and Bernstein testing. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 410-415
28. Castell DO, Vela M. Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH-metry: an evolving technique to measure type and proximal extent of gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Med 2001; 111 Suppl 8 A: 157S-159S
29. Tutuian R, Castell DO. Multichannel intraluminal impedance: general principles and technical issues. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2005; 15: 257-264
30. Silny J. Intraluminal multiple electric impedance procedure for measurement of gastrointestinal motility. J Gastrointest Motil 1991; 3: 151-162
31. Sifrim D. Acid, weakly acidic and non-acid gastro-oesophageal reflux: differences, prevalence and clinical relevance. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 16: 823-830
32. Mainte I, Tutuian R, Shay S et al. Acid and non-acid reflux in patients with persistent symptoms despite acid supptessive therapy: a multicentre study using combined ambulatory impedance-pH monitoring. Gut 2006; 55: 1398-1402
33. Tutuian R, Castell DO. Reflux monitoring: role of combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2005; 15: 361-371
34. Castell DO, Mainie I, Tutuian R. Non-acid gastroesophageal reflux: documenting its relationship to symptoms using multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII). Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 2005; 116: 321-333; discussion 333-324
35. Tamhankar AP, Peters JH, Portale G et al. Omeprazole does not reduce gastroesophageal reflux: new insights using multichannel intraluminal impedance technology. J Gastrointest Surg 2004; 8: 890-897 discussion 897-898
36. Dekel R, Martinez-Hawthorne SD, Guillen RJ et al. Evaluation of symptom index in identifying gastroesophageal reflux disease-related non-cardiac chest pain. J Clin Gastroenterol 2004; 38: 24-29
37. Pandolfino JE, Shi G, Zhang Q et al. Measuring EGJ opening patterns using high resolution intraluminal impedance. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2005; 17: 200-206
38. Zentilin P, Iiritano E, Dulbecco P et al. Normal values of 24-h ambulatory intraluminal impedance combined with pH-metry in subjects eating a Mediterranean diet. Dig Liver Dis 2006; 38: 226-232
39. Roman S, Poncet G, Serraj I et al. Characterization of reflux events after fundoplication using combined impedance-pH recording. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 48-52
40. Vela MF, Tutuian R, Katz PO et al. Baclofen decreases acid and non-acid post-prandial gastro-oesophageal reflux measured by combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003; 17: 243-251
41. Wong WM, Bautista J, Dekel R et al. Feasibility and tolerability of transnasal/per-oral placement of the wireless pH capsule vs. traditional 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring - a randomized trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005; 21: 155-163
42. Ward EM, Devault KR, Bouras EP et al. Successful oesophageal pH monitoring with a catheter-free system. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004; 19: 449-454
43. Pandolfino JE, Richter JE, Ours T et al. Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring using a wireless system. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 740-749
44. Fass R, Hell R, Sampliner RE et al. Effect of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring on reflux-provoking activities. Dig Dis Sci 1999; 44: 2263-2269
45. Tu CH, Lee YC, Wang HP et al. Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring by using a wireless system: a pilot study in Taiwan. Hepatogastroenterology 2004; 51: 1586-1589
46. Remes-Troche JM, Ibarra-Palomino J, Carmona-Sanchez RI et al. Performance, tolerability, and symptoms related to prolonged pH monitoring using the Bravo system in Mexico. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 2382-2386
47. des Varannes SB, Mion F, Ducrotte P et al. Simultaneous recordings of oesophageal acid exposure with conventional pH monitoring and a wireless system (Bravo). Gut 2005; 54: 1682-1686
48. Ahlawat SK, Novak DJ, Williams DC et al. Day-to-day variability in acid reflux patterns using the BRAVO pH monitoring system. J Clin Gastroenterol 2006; 40: 20-24
49. Triester SL, Leighton JA, Budavari AI et al. Severe chest pain from an indwelling Bravo pH probe. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 317-319
50. Fajardo NR, Wise JL, Locke 3rd GR et al. Esophageal perforation after placement of wireless Bravo pH probe. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 184-185
51. Pandolfino JE, Zhang Q, Schreiner MA et al. Acid reflux event detection using the Bravo wireless versus the Slimline catheter pH systems: why are the numbers so different? Gut 2005; 54: 1687-1692
52. Kauer WK, Peters JH, DeMeester TR et al. Composition and concentration of bile acid teflux into the esophagus of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surgery 1997; 122: 874-881
53. Chen X, Yang G, Ding WY et al. An esophagogastroduodenal anastomosis model for esophageal adenocarcinogenesis in rats and enhancement by iron overload. Carcinogenesis 1999; 20: 1801-1808
54. Menges M, Muller M, Zeitz M. Increased acid and bile reflux in Barrett's esophagus compared to reflux esophagitis, and effect of proton pump inhibitor therapy. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 331-337
55. Girelli CM, Cuvello P, Limido E et al. Duodenogastric reflux: an update. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91: 648-653
56. Baldini F, Bechi P, Cianchi F et al. Analysis of the optical properties of bile. J Biomed Opt 2000; 5: 321-329
57. Vaezi MF, Richter JE. Duodenogastroesophageal reflux and methods to monitot nonacidic reflux. Am J Med 2001; 111 Suppl 8 A: 160S-168S
58. Vaezi MF, Richter JE. Role of acid and duodenogastroesophageal reflux in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology 1996; 111: 1192-1199
59. Vaezi MF, Lacamera RG, Richter JE. Validation studies of Bilitec 2000: an ambulatory duodenogastric reflux monitoring system. Am J Physiol 1994; 267: G1050-1057
60. Kauer WK, Burdiles P, Ireland AP et al. Does duodenal juice reflux into the esophagus of patients with complicated GERD? Evaluation of a fiberoptic sensor for bilirubin. Am J Surg 1995; 169: 98-103
61. Champion G, Richter JE, Vaezi MF et al. Duodenogastroesophageal reflux: relationship to pH and importance in Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology 1994; 107: 747-754
62. Caldwell MT, Lawlor P, Byrne PJ et al. Ambulatory oesophageal bile reflux monitoring in Barrett's oesophagus. Br J Surg 1995; 82: 657-660
63. Bechi P, Pucciani F, Baldini F et al. Long-term ambulatory enterogastric reflux monitoring. Validation of a new fiberoptic technique. Dig Dis Sci 1993; 38: 1297-1306
64. Barrett MW, Myers JC, Watson DI et al. Detection of bile reflux: in vivo validation of the Bilitec fibreoptic system. Dis Esophagus 2000; 13: 44-50
65. Vaezi MF, Singh S, Richter JE. Role of acid and duodenogastric reflux in esophageal mucosal injury: a review of animal and human studies. Gastroenterology 1995; 108: 1897-1907
66. Byrne JP, Romagnoli R, Bechi P et al. Duodenogastric reflux of bile in health: the normal range. Physiol Meas 1999; 20: 149-158
67. Sifrim D, Holloway R, Silny J et al. Acid, nonacid, and gas reflux in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease during ambulatory 24-hour pH-impedance recordings. Gastroenterology 2001; 120: 1588-1598
68. Dekel R, Pearson T, Wendel C et al. Assessment of oesophageal motor function in patients with dysphagia or chest pain - the Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative experience. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003; 18: 1083-1089
69. Lemme EM, Moraes-Filho JP, Domingues G et al. Manometric findings of esophageal motor disorders in 240 Brazilian patients with non-cardiac chest pain. Dis Esophagus 2000; 13: 117-121