Simultaneous recordings of oesophageal acid exposure with conventional pH monitoring and a wireless system (Bravo)

Gut

Volumn 54, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 1682-1686

  Bruley Des Varannes, S ^a   Mion, F ^b   Ducrotte P ^c   Zerbib, F ^d   Denis, P ^c   Ponchon, T ^b   Thibault, R ^a   Galmiche, J P ^a  

^a HÔTEL DIEU   (France)

^b CHU Hôtel Dieu ^*  (France)

^c HÔPITAL CHARLES NICOLLE   (France)

^d Service des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACID;

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOANALYSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; ELECTRODE; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; HUMAN; MALE; NASOPHARYNX; PH MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ADULT; AGED; CAPSULES; FEMALE; GASTRIC ACIDITY DETERMINATION; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; HUMANS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, AMBULATORY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TELEMETRY;

EID: 27644436941     PISSN: 00175749     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/gut.2005.066274     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Kahrilas PJ, Quigley EM. Clinical esophageal pH recording: a technical review for practice guideline development. Gastroenterology 1996;110:1982-96.
2. Picon L, Bruley des Varannes S, et le Groupe de Travail sur les Recommandations pour la Pratique de la pHmétrie œsophagienne. Recommandations pour la pratique de la pHmétrie œsophagienne chez l'adulte. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2000;24:931-43.
3. DeVault KR, Castell DO. Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:190-200.
4. French-Belgian Consensus Conference on Adult Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease 'Diagnosis and Treatment': report of a meeting held in Paris, France, on 21-22 January 1999. The Jury of the consensus conference. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2000;12:129-37.
5. Dent J, Brun J, Fendrick AM, et al. An evidence-based appraisal of reflux disease management-the Genval Workshop Report. Gut 1999;44(suppl 2):S1-16.
6. Fass R, Hell R, Sampliner RE, et al. Effect of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring on reflux-provoking activities. Dig Dis Sci, 1999;44;2263-9.
7. Pandolfino JE, Richter JE, Ours T, et al. Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring using a wireless system. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:740-9.
8. Shi G, Bruley des Varannes S, Scarpignato C, et al. Reflux-related symptoms in patients with normal oesophageal acid exposure to acid. Gut 1995;37:457-64.
9. Weitsten BL, Roelofs JM, Akkermans LM, et al. The symptom-association probability: an improved method for symptom analysis of 24-hour esophageal pH data. Gastroenterology 1994;107:1741-5.
10. Wong WM, Bautista J, Dekel R, et al. Feasability and tolerability of transnasal/per-oral placement of trie wireless pH capsule vs. Traditional 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring-a randomized trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005;21:155-63.
11. Clause RE, Prakash C, Haroian LR. Symptom association tests are improved by the extended ambulatory pH recording time with the Bravo capsule. Gastroenterology 2003;124(suppl 1):A537.