Controlled decontrolling: Involution and democratisation in dutch rural planning

Planning Theory and Practice

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 473-488

  Boonstra, Wiebren Johannes ^a,b   Van Den Brink, Adri ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Institutions; Involution; Power; Rural planning; The Netherlands

Indexed keywords

DEMOCRATIZATION; PLANNING PRACTICE; POWER RELATIONS; RURAL PLANNING;

BENELUX; EURASIA; EUROPE; NETHERLANDS; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 37349106137     PISSN: 14649357     EISSN: 1470000X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14649350701664721     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Alexander, E. R. (2001) The planner-prince: Interdependence, rationalities and post-communicative practice. Planning Theory & Practice, 2:3, pp. 311-324.
2. Allen, A. (1999) The Power of Feminist Theory: Domination, Resistance, Solidarity, Westview Press, Boulder, CD
3. Andela, G. (2000) Kneedbaar landschap, kneedbaar volk: De heroïsche jaren van de ruilverkavelingen in Nederland, THOTH, Bussum
4. Berger, P. L. and Luckmann, T. (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Anchor Books, New York
5. Bohman, J. (1998) The coming of age of deliberative democracy. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 6:4, pp. 400-425.
6. Booher, D. E. and Innes, J. E. (2002) Network power in collaborative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21:3, pp. 221-236.
7. Boonstra, W. J. (2006) Policies in the polder: How institutions mediate between norms and practices of rural governance. Sociologia Ruralis, 46:4, pp. 299-317.
8. Boonstra, W. J. (2006) Polder Limits: A Case Study of Value-Conflicts on Dutch Rural Land Use, Wageningen University, Wageningen
9. Boonstra, W. J. and Frouws, J. (2005) Conflicts about water: A case study of contest and power in Dutch rural policy. Journal of Rural Studies, 21:3, pp. 297-312.
10. Bouma, J. (1961) De ruilverkaveling "Het Koningsdiep": Een analyse van de stemmingsuitslag vooral met betrekking tot de stemgerechtigde boeren, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam
11. Bouma, L. H. and Nijboer, W. (1963) Petearsintrum Álddjip: Begeleiding van de ruilverkaveling in het blok "het Koningsdiep" 1959-1963, Stichting Friesland voor Maatschappelijk Werk, Leeuwarden
12. Brenninkmeijer, A. F. M. (2004) Regeldruk. Nederlands Juristenblad, 2, pp. 1-3.
13. 3 ROM-Project Zuidoost Friesland, Provincie Fryslǎn, Leeuwarden
14. Connelly, S. and Richardson, T. (2004) Exclusion: The necessary difference between ideal and practical consensus. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 47:1, pp. 3-17.
15. De Jong, E. and Herweijer, M. (2004) Alle regels tellen, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen
16. Edwards, B., Goodwin, M., Pemperton, S. and Woods, M. (2001) Partnerships, power, and scale in rural governance. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 19:2, pp. 289-310.
17. Faludi, A. and Van der Valk, A. (1994) Rule and Order: Dutch Planning Doctrine in the Twentieth Century, Kluwer, Dordrecht
18. Fischler, R. (2000) Communicative planning: A Foucauldian assessment. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19:4, pp. 358-368.
19. Flyvbjerg, B. (1998) Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago & London
20. Flyvbjerg, B. (2004) Phronetic planning research: Theoretical and methodological reflections. Planning Theory & Practice, 5:3, pp. 283-306.
21. Forester, J. (2004) Reflections on trying to teach planning theory, Interface. Planning Theory & Practice, 5:2, pp. 242-251.
22. Foucault, M. (1976) Truth and power. Power: Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984, pp. 111-133. New York Press, New York
23. Foucault, M. (1978) The subject and power. Power: Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984, pp. 326-348. New York Press, New York
24. Frissen, P. H. A. (2001) Consensus Democracy in a Post-modern Perspective. Polder Politics: The Re-invention of Consensus Democracy in the Netherlands, pp. 61-75. Ashgate, Aldershot
25. Geertz, C. (1963) Agricultural Involution, University of California Press, Berkeley
26. Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society, University of California Press, Berkeley
27. Hajer, M. and Zonneveld, W. (2000) Spatial planning in the network society: Rethinking the principles of planning in the Netherlands. European Planning Studies, 8:3, pp. 337-355.
28. Hanekamp, J. C. (1995) De wetenschappelijke basis van het Nederlandse ammoniakbeleid, Stichting HAN, Amsterdam
29. Healey, P. (1990) Places, people and policies. Town and Country Planning, 59:1, pp. 9-10.
30. Healey, P. (2003) Collaborative planning in perspective. Planning Theory, 2:2, pp. 101-123.
31. Hendriks, F. and Tops, P. W. (2000) Leiderschap in een consensusdemocratie. Bestuurskunde, 9:6, pp. 254-265.
32. Hendriks, F. and Toonen, T. A. J. (2001) Polder Politics: The Re-invention of Consensus Democracy in the Netherlands, Ashgate, Aldershot
33. Hillier, J. (2003) Agonízing over consensus: Why Habermasian ideals cannot be "real". Planning Theory, 2:1, pp. 37-59.
34. Innes, J. E. (2004) Consensus building: Clarifications for the critics. Planning Theory, 3:1, pp. 5-20.
35. Joosse, S. M. (2007) Talking about cooperation: Continuity and change in a rural community in Slovakia. Sociologia, 39:3, pp. 245-258.
36. Knight, J. and Johnson, J. (1994) Aggregation and deliberation: On the possibility of democratic legitimacy. Political Theory, 22:2, pp. 277-296.
37. Larsson, J. and Elander, I. (2001) Consensus, democracy and the land surveyor in the Swedish cadastral executive procedure. Planning Theory & Practice, 2:3, pp. 325-342.
38. Lijphart, A. (1997) Unequal participation: Democracy's unresolved dilemma. American Political Science Review, 91:1, pp. 1-14.
39. March, A. and Low, N. (2004) Knowing and steering: Mediatisation, planning and democracy in Victoria, Australia. Planning Theory, 3:1, pp. 41-69.
40. Marinetto, M. (2003) Governing beyond the centre: A critique of the Anglo-Governance School. Political Studies, 51:3, pp. 592-608.
41. Mastenbroek, W. F. G. (1999) Negotiation as emotion management. Theory, Culture and Society, 16:4, pp. 49-73.
42. Mels, T. (2005) Between "platial" imaginations and spatial rationalities: Navigating justice and law in the low countries. Landscape Research, 30:3, pp. 321-335.
43. Neblo, M. (2005) Thinking through democracy: Between the theory and practice of deliberative politics. Acta Politica, 40:2, pp. 169-181.
44. Phelps, N. A. and Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2000) Scratching the surface of collaborative and associative governance: Identifying the diversity of social action in institutional capacity building. Environment and Planning A, 32:1, pp. 111-130.
45. Rose, N. and Miller, P. (1992) Political power beyond the state: problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology, 43:2, pp. 173-205.
46. Saarikoski, H. (2002) Naturalized epistemology and dilemmas of planning practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22:1, pp. 3-14.
47. Stein, S. and Harper, T. (2003) Power, trust and planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23:2, pp. 125-139.
48. Stoker, G. (1998) Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50:1, pp. 17-18.
49. Tait, M. (2002) Room for manoeuvre? An actor-network study of central-local relations in development plan making. Planning Theory & Practice, 3:1, pp. 69-85.
50. Van der Ploeg, J. D. (2003) The Virtual Farmer, Royal Van Gorcum, Assen
51. Vuijsje, H. and Wouters, C. (1999) Macht en gezag in het laatste kwart, inpakken en wegwezen, SCP, Den Haag
52. Young, I. M. (2001) Activist challenges to deliberative democracy. Political Theory, 29:5, pp. 670-690.
53. Zijderveld, A. C. (2000) The Institutional Imperative: The Interface of Institutions and Networks, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam