Eye movements and time-based selection: Where do the eyes go in preview search?

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 852-857

  Watson, Derrick G ^a   Inglis, Matthew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 37349104041     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194111     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. BRAITHWAITE, J. J., HUMPHREYS, G. W., & HULLEMAN, J. (2005). Color-based grouping and inhibition in visual search: Evidence from a probe detection analysis of preview search. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 81-101.
2. DEUBEL, H., & SCHNEIDER, W. X. (1996). Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Research, 36, 1827-1837.
3. DONK, M. (2005). Prioritizing selection of new elements: On the time course of the preview effect. Visual Cognition, 12, 1373-1385.
4. DONK, M., & THEEUWES, J. (2001). Visual marking beside the mark: Prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 891-900.
5. DONK, M., & THEEUWES, J. (2003). Prioritizing selection of new elements: Bottom-up versus top-down control. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 1231-1242.
6. GREENE, H. H., & RAYNER, K. (2001). Eye movements and familiarity effects in visual search. Vision Research, 41, 3763-3773.
7. JIANG, Y., CHUN, M. M., & MARKS, L. E. (2002). Visual marking: Selective attention to asynchronous temporal groups. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 717-730.
8. JIANG, Y., & WANG, S. W. (2004). What kind of memory supports visual marking? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 30, 79-91.
9. OLIVERS, C. N. L., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (2002). When visual marking meets the attentional blink: More evidence for top-down, limited-capacity inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 22-42.
10. OLIVERS, C. N. L., HUMPHREYS, G. W., HEINKE, D., & COOPER, A. C. G. (2002). Prioritization in visual search: Visual marking is not dependent on a mnemonic search. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 540-560.
11. SHEN, J., REINGOLD, E. M., & POMPLUN, M. (2000). Distractor ratio influences patterns of eye movements during visual search. Perception, 29, 241-250.
12. WATSON, D. G., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review, 104, 90-122.
13. WATSON, D. G., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1998). Visual marking of moving objects: A role for top-down feature based inhibition in selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 946-962.
14. WATSON, D. G., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (2000). Visual marking: Evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 471-481.
15. WATSON, D. G., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (2002). Visual marking and visual change. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 379-395.
16. WATSON, D. G., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (2005). The effects of irrelevant changes on preview search. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 418-434.
17. WATSON, D. G., HUMPHREYS, G. W., & OLIVERS, C. N. L. (2003). Visual marking: Using time in visual selection. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 180-186.
18. WILLIAMS, D. E., REINGOLD, E. M., MOSCOVITCH, M., & BEHRMANN, M. (1997). Patterns of eye movements during parallel and serial visual search tasks. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 151-164.
19. WOLFE, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.
20. ZELINSKY, G. J., RAO, R. P. N., HAYHOE, M. M., & BALLARD, D. H. (1997). Eye movements reveal the spatiotemporal dynamics of visual search. Psychological Science, 8, 448-453.
21. ZELINSKY, G. J., & SHEINBERG, D. L. (1997). Eye movements during parallel-serial visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 244-262.