Would you like some cardiopulmonary bypass with your coronary revascularization?

Circulation

Volumn 116, Issue 16, 2007, Pages 1756-1758

  Puskas, John D ^a,b   Steele, Mark ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery   (United States)

Author keywords

Cardiopulmonary bypass; Coronary artery bypass; Editorials

Indexed keywords

CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CARDIOTOMY; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; EDITORIAL; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HEART SURGERY; HUMAN; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; OFF PUMP CORONARY SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS, OFF-PUMP; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; HUMANS; MORBIDITY;

EID: 37349096632     PISSN: 00097322     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.733089     Document Type: Editorial

References (21)

1. Edmunds L. Inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66:12-16.
2. National Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Database: Spring Report; 2007www.sts.org/sections/stsnationaldatabase/publications/executive/ article.html.
3. Cleveland JC, Shroyer ALW, Chen AY, Peterson E, Grover FL. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting decreases risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:1282-1289.
4. Magee MM, Coombs LP, Peterson ED, Mack MJ. Patient selection and current practice strategy for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation. 2003;108(suppl 1):II9-II14.
5. Hannan EL, Wu C, Smith CR, Higgins RSD, Carlson RE, Culliford AF, Gold JP, Jones RH. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Differences in short-term outcomes and in long-term mortality and need for subsequent revascularization. Circulation. 2007;116:1-8.
6. Puskas JD, Edwards FH, Pappas PA, O'Brien S, Peterson ED, Kilgo P, Ferguson TB. Off-pump techniques benefit men and women and narrow the disparity in mortality after coronary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. In press.
7. Puskas JD, Kilgo PD, Kutner M, Pusca SV, Lattouf O, Guyton RA. Off-pump techniques disproportionately benefit women and narrow the gender disparity in outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation. In press.
8. Puskas JD, Williams WH, Duke PG, Staples JR, Glas KE, Marshall JJ, Leimbach M, Huber P, Garas S, Sammons BH, McCall SA, Petersen RJ, Bailey DE, Chu H, Mahoney EM, Weintraub WS, Guyton RA. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides complete revascularization with reduced myocardial injury, transfusion requirements, and length of stay. A prospective randomized comparison of two hundred unselected patients undergoing off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;125:797-808.
9. Puskas J, Williams W, Mahoney E. Off-pump vs conventional coronary artery bypass grafting. Early and 1-year graft patency, cost, and quality of life outcomes a randomized trial. JAMA. 2004;291:1841-1849.
10. Angelini G, Taylor F, Reeves B, Ascione R. Early and midterm outcome after off-pump and on-pump surgery in beating heart against cardioplegic arrest studies (BHACAS 1 and 2). A pooled analysis of two randomized controlled studies. Lancet. 2002;359:1194-1200.
11. Kobayashi J, Tashiro T, Ochi M, Yaku H, Watanabe G, Satoh Tagusari O, Nakajima H, Kitamura S; Japanese Off-Pump Coronary Revascularization Investigation (JOCRI) Study Group. Early outcome of randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multiple arterial coronary revascularization. Circulation. 2005;112(suppl):I338-I343.
12. Puskas JD, Cheng D, Knight J, Angelini G, DeCannier D, Diegeler A, Dullum M, Martin J, Ochi M, Patel N, Sim E, Trehan N, Zamvar V. Off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting. A meta-analysis and consensus statement from the 2004 ISMICS consensus conference. Innovations. 2005;1:3-27.
13. Cheng DC, Bainbridge D, Martin JE, Novick RJ. Does off-pump coronary artery bypass reduce mortality, morbidity and resource utilization when compared with conventional coronary artery bypass? A meta-analysis of randomized trails. Anesthesiology. 2005;102:188-203.
14. Mazzei V, Nasso G, Salamone G, Castorino F, Tommasini A, Anselmi A. Prospective randomized comparison of coronary bypass grafting with minimal extracorporeal circulation system (MECC) versus off-pump coronary surgery. Circulation. 2007;116:1761-1767.
15. Sellke FW, DiMaio JM, Caplan LR, Ferguson TB, Gardner TJ, Hiratzka LF, Isselbacher EM, Lytle W, Mack MJ, Murkin JM, Robbins RC; American Heart Association. Comparing on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: numerous studies but few conclusions. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association council on cardiovascular surgery and anesthesia in collaboration with the interdisciplinary working group on quality of care and outcomes research. Circulation. 2005;111:2858-2864.
16. Khan NE, De Souza A, Mister R, Flather M, Clague J, Davies S, Collins P, Wang D, Sigwart U, Pepper J. A randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronary artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:21-28.
17. Song HK, Petersen RJ, Sharoni E, Guyton RA, Puskas JD. Safe evolution towards routine off-pump coronary artery bypass. Negotiating the learning curve. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;24:947-952.
18. Aldea GS, Soltow LO, Chandler WL, Triggs CM, Vocelka CR, Crockett GI, Shin YT, Curtis WE, Verrier ED. Limitation of thrombin generation, platelet activation, and inflammation by elimination of cardiotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;123:742-755.
19. Skrabal CA, Khosravi A, Choi YH, Kaminski A, Westphal B, Steinhoff G, Liebold A. Pericardial suction blood separation attenuates inflammatory response and hemolysis after cardiopulmonary bypass. Scandinavian Cardiovasc J. 2006;40:219-223.
20. Remadi JP, Rakotoarivelo A, Marticho P, Benamar A. Prospective randomized study comparing coronary artery bypass grafting with the new mini-extracorporeal circulation Jostra System or with a standard cardiopulmonary bypass. Am Heart J. 2006;151:198.e1-198.e7.
21. Norman MJ, Sistino JJ, Acsell JR. The effectiveness of low-prime cardiopulmonary bypass circuits at removing gaseous emboli. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2004;36:336-342.