Ethics committees and the legality of research

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 33, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 732-736

  Douglas, Thomas M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEGAL ASPECT; NEW ZEALAND; POLICY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD;

ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; NEW ZEALAND; PUBLIC POLICY;

EID: 37349092029     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2007.020479     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. National Health and Medical Research Council. National statement on ethical conduct in research involving humans. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 1999:5.
2. National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Research Council, Australian Vice-Chancellors' Committee, National Health and Medical Research Council. National statement on ethical conduct in human research, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2007.
3. Ministry of Health. Operational standard for ethics committees, Updated edn. Wellington: Ministry of Health, 2002.
4. Moore A. Research, ethics committees, and legal issues. NZ Bioeth J 2003;4:8-15.
5. Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Social Sciences Research Council of Canada. Tricouncil policy statement: ethical conduct for research involving humans. Ottawa: Interagency Secretariat on Research Ethics, 2005.
6. Department of Health. Research governance framework for health and social care. 2nd ed. London: DH, 2005:37.
7. Duffy A, Barrett D, Duggan M. Report of the ministerial inquiry into the under-reporting of cervical smear abnormalities in the Gisborne region. Wellington: Gisborne Cervical Screening Inquiry, 2001, http://www.csi.org.nz.
8. Evans D. Brief of Donald Morgan Evans in the matter of the Health and Disability Services Act 1993 and in the matter of a Ministerial Inquiry into the Under-reporting of Cervical Smear Abnormalities in the Gisborne Region. 4 August 2000. http://www.csi.org.nz.
9. National Ethics Advisory Committee. Fourth annual report to the Minister of Health. Wellington: Ministry of Health, 2006.
10. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research involving Human Subjects. Geneva: CIOMS, 2002, http://www.cioms.ch.
11. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Helsinki: World Medical Association, 1964. http://www.wma.net.
12. Dworkin R. Taking rights seriously. London: Duckworth, 1977.
13. Dworkin R. Laws empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1986.
14. De Ville K, Hassler G. Healthcare ethics committees and the law: uneasy but inevitable bedfellows. HEC Forum 2001;13:13-31.
15. Raz J. The authority of law: essays on law and morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979.
16. Clarke S. Two models of ethics committees. J Bioeth Inq 2005;2:41-7.