|
|
Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 41-47
|
|
Two models of ethics committees.
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ANALYTICAL APPROACH;
ANIMAL;
ANIMAL EXPERIMENT;
ANIMAL WELFARE;
ARTICLE;
BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
ETHICIST;
ETHICS;
HUMAN;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
NEW ZEALAND;
NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL;
ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;
PATERNALISM;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE;
PROFESSIONAL STANDARD;
RESEARCH ETHICS;
SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;
STANDARD;
ANALYTICAL APPROACH;
BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
ANIMAL CARE COMMITTEES;
ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION;
ANIMALS;
ETHICAL RELATIVISM;
ETHICAL REVIEW;
ETHICISTS;
ETHICS;
ETHICS COMMITTEES;
ETHICS, RESEARCH;
GUIDELINES;
HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION;
HUMANS;
MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL;
NEW ZEALAND;
PATERNALISM;
PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE;
PROFESSIONAL ROLE;
SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;
SOCIAL VALUES;
|
|
EID: 23244461267
PISSN: 11767529
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1007/BF02448814 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (1)
|
|
References (0)
|
