Taxonomic review of Allobates (Anura, Aromobatidae) from the Atlantic Forest, Brazil

Journal of Herpetology

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 566-580

  Verdade, Vanessa K ^a   Rodrigues, Miguel T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANURA; DENDROBATIDAE; EPIPEDOBATES;

EID: 37349075455     PISSN: 00221511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1670/06-094.1     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. AB'SABER, A. N. 1977. Domínios Morfoclimáticos e províncias fitogeográficas do Brasil. Orientação. Departamento de Geografia da Universidade de São Paulo 3:45-48.
2. ALTIG, R., AND R. W. MCDIARMID. 1999. Body plan development and morphology. In R. W. McDiarmid and R. Altig (eds.), Tadpoles. The Biology of Anuran Larvae, pp. 24-51. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
3. BOKERMANN, W. C. A. 1966. Lista Anotada das Localidades Tipo de Anfíbios Brasileiros. RUSP, São Paulo, Brasil.
4. _. 1967. Novas espécies de Phyllobates do leste e sudeste brasileiro (Anura, Dendrobatidae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia 27:349-353.
5. CALDWELL, J. P., AND A. P. LIMA. 2003. A new Amazonian species of Colostethus (Anura: Dendrobatidae) with a nidicolous tadpole. Herpetologica 59:219-234.
6. CALDWELL, J. P., A. P. LIMA, AND C. KELLER. 2002a. Redescription of Colostethus marchesianus (Melin, 1941) from its type locality. Copeia 2002:157-165.
7. CALDWELL, J. P., A. P. LIMA, AND G. M. BIAVATI. 2002b. Descriptions of tadpoles of Colostethus marchesianus and Colostethus caerulodactylus (Anura: Dendrobatidae) from their type localities. Copeia 2002:166-172.
8. COCHRAN, D. M. 1955. Frogs of southeastern Brazil. Bulletin of the United States National Museum 206:1-411.
9. COLOMA, L. A. 1995. Ecuadorian frogs of the genus Colostethus (Anura: Dendrobatidae). Miscellaneous Publications, Museum of Natural History of the University of Kansas 87:1-67.
10. EDWARDS, S. R. 1974. A Phenetic Analysis of the Genus Colostethus (Anura: Dendrobatidae). Unpubl. Ph.D. diss., University of Kansas, Lawrence.
11. FROST, D. R. 2006. Amphibian Species of the World: An Online Reference. Version 3.0. [cited 20 September, 2006]. American Museum of Natural History, New York. Electronic database accessible at http://research.amnh.org/ herpetology/amphibia/index.html.
12. GOSNER, K. L. 1960. A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16:183-190.
13. GRANT, T., AND F. CASTRO. 1998. The cloud forest Colostethus (Anura, Dendrobatidae) of a region of the Cordillera Occidental of Colombia. Journal of Herpetology 32:378-392.
14. GRANT, T., AND L. O. RODRIGUEZ. 2001. Two new species of the genus Colostethus (Dendrobatidae) from Peru and a redescription of C. trilineatus (Boulenger, 1883). American Museum Novitates 3355:1-24.
15. GRANT, T., E. C. HUMPHREY, AND C. W. MYERS. 1997. The median lingual process of frogs: a bizarre character of old world ranoids discovered in South American dendrobatids. American Museum Novitates 3212:1-40.
16. GRANT, T., D. R. FROST, J. P. CALDWELL, R. GAGLIARDO, C. F. B. HADDAD, P. J. R. KOK, D. B. MEANS, B. P. NOONAN, W. E. SCHARGEL, AND W. C. WHEELER. 2006. Phylogenetic systematics of Dart-Poison Frogs and their relatives (Amphibia: Athesphatanura: Dendrobatidae). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 299:1-262.
17. HEYER, W. R. 1988. On frog distribution patterns east of the Andes. In P. E. Vanzolini and W. R. Heyer (eds.), Proceedings of a Workshop on Neotropical Distribution Patterns, pp. 245-273. Academia Brasileira de Ciências, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
18. IZECKSOHN, E., AND S. P CARVALHO-E-SILVA. 2001. Anfíbios do Município do Rio de Janeiro. Editora da UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
19. JACKSON, J. F. 1978. Differentiation in the genera Enyalius and Strobilurus (Iguanidae): implications for Pleistocene climatic changes in eastern Brazil. Arquivos de Zoologia, São Paulo 30:1-79.
20. JUNCÁ, F. A. 1998. Reproductive biology of Colostethus stepheni and Colostethus marchesianus (Dendrobatidae), with the description of a new anuran mating behavior. Herpetologica 54:377-387.
21. KOK, P. J. R., R. D. MACCULLOCH, P. GAUCHER, E. H. POELMAN, G. R. BOURNE, A. LATHROP, AND G. L. LENGLET. 2006. A new species of Colostethus (Anura, Dendrobatidae) from French Guiana with a redescription of Colostethus beebei (Noble, 1923) from its type locality. Phyllomedusa 5:43-66.
22. LIMA, A. P., AND J. P. CALDWELL. 2001. A new Amazonian species of Colostethus with sky blue digits. Herpetologica 57:180-189.
23. LUTZ, A. 1925. Batraciens du Brésil. Comptes Rendus Societe Biologie Paris XCIII, 137-139.
24. LUTZ, B. 1954. Anfíbios anuros do Distrito Federal. Memóries do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 52:155-238.
25. MORALES, V. M. 2000. Sistematica y biogeografia del grupo trilineatus (Amphibia, Anura, Dendrobatidae, Colostethus), con descripción de once nuevas especies. Publicaciones de la Asociacion de Amigos de Donana 13:5-59.
26. POMBAL, J. P., Jr., AND C. F. B. HADDAD. 1992. Espécies de Phyllomedusa do grupo burmeisteri do Brasil oriental, com descrição de uma espécie nova (Amphibia, Hylidae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia 52:217-229.
27. RIVERO, J. A. 1988. Sobre las relaciones de las especies del genero Colostethus (Anura, Dendrobatidae). Memoria da Sociedad de Ciencias Naturales La Salle XLVIII, 3-32.
28. SAVAGE, J. S. 1968. The dendrobatid frogs of Central America. Copeia 1968:745-776.
29. SILVA-FILHO, I. S. N., AND F. A. JUNCÁ. 2006. Evidence of full species status of the neotropical leaf-frog Phyllomedusa burmeisteri baihana (A. Lutz, 1925) (Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae). Zootaxa 1113:51-64.
30. SILVERSTONE, P. A. 1975. A revision of the Poison-Arrow Frogs of the genus Phyllobates Bibron in Sagra (Family Dendrobatidae). Bulletin of the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History 27:1-53.
31. SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE HERPETOLOGIA. 2005. Lista das espécies de anfíbios do Brasil. [cited 15 August, 2005]. Sociedade Brasileira de Herpetologia, São Paulo, Brazil, Electronic database accessible at http//:www.sbherpetologia.org.br/checklist/anfibios.htm.
32. SUGUIO, K., AND A. C. R. NOGUEIRA. 1999. Revisão crítica dos conhecimentos geológicos sobre a formação (ou grupo?) Barreiras do Neógeno e o seu possível significado como testemunho de alguns eventos geológicos mundiais. Geociências, São Paulo 18:461-479.
33. WEYGOLDT, P. 1989. Changes in the composition of mountain stream frog communities in the Atlantic mountains of Brazil: frogs as indicators of environmental deteriorations? Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 243:249-255.