"Once more about the quadratic trinomial...": On the formation of methodological skills

Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education

Volumn 10, Issue 4-6, 2007, Pages 405-414

  Karp, Alexander ^a  

^a Teachers College Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Methodological skills; Problem solving; Quadratic trinomial

Indexed keywords

EID: 37349068640     PISSN: 13864416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10857-007-9037-9     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ball, D. (1990). Prospective elementary and secondary teachers' understanding of division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21 (2), 132-144.
2. Cooney, T. (1985). A beginning teacher's view of problem solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(5), 324-336.
3. Even, R. (1993). Subject-matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: Prospective secondary teachers and the function concept. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(2), 94-116.
4. Even, R., & Markovits, Z. (1993). Teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of functions: Characterization and applications. Journal of Structural Learning, 12(1), 35-51.
5. Karp, A. (2004). Conducting Research and Solving Problems: The Russian Experience of Inservice Training. In T. Watanabe, & D. Thompson (Eds.) The Work of Mathematics Teacher Educators. Exchanging Ideas for Effective Practice (pp. 35-48). Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators.
6. Karp, A. (2006). And now put aside your pens and calculators: On mental problem solving in the high school mathematics classroom. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 28(1), 23-36.
7. Lednev, V., Nikandrov, N., Lazutova, M. (1998). Uchebnye standarty Rossii (Russian Teaching Standards), vol. 2. Moscow: Promethey.
8. Leontiev, A. (1978). Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Hillsdale: Prentice-Hall.
9. Liaschenko, E. (Ed.) (1988). Laboratornye i prakticheskie raboty po metodike prepodavania matematiki (Laboratory and Practical Studies on Mathematics Teaching Methodology). Moscow: Prosveschenie.
10. Mason, J. (1998). Enabling teachers to be real teachers: Necessary levels of awareness and structure of attention. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(3), 243-267.
11. Merseth, Katherine (2003). Windows on teaching math: Cases of middle and secondary classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
12. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston: VA.
13. Runesson, U. (2005). Beyound discourse and interaction. Variation: A critical aspect for teaching and learning mathematics. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(1), 69-87.
14. Sarantsev, G. (2002). Metodika obuchenia matematike v sredney shkole (School Mathematics Teaching Methodology). Moscow: Prosveschenie.
15. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
16. Stefanova, N., & Podhodova, N. (Eds.) (2005). Metodika i technologiia obucheniia matematike. Kurs lekzii (The Methodology and Technology of Mathematics Teaching. A Course of Lectures). Moscow: Drofa.
17. Vygotsky, Lev (1986). Thought and Language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
18. Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2005). Mathematics as a constructive activity. Learners generating examples. Mahwah, NJ/London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
19. Zaslavsky, O. (1995). Open-ended tasks as a trigger for mathematics teachers' professional development. For the Learning of Mathematics, 15(3), 15-20.