Selection of promising genotypes based on path and cluster analyses

Journal of Agricultural Science

Volumn 146, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 85-92

  Kozak, M ^a   Bocianowski, J ^b   Rybinski W ^c  

^a WARSAW UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Poland)

^b POZNA UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Poland)

^c INSTITUTE OF PLANT GENETICS   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CROP YIELD; CULTIVAR; GENOTYPE; LEGUME; MUTATION; SEED PRODUCTION; SELECTIVE BREEDING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 37349061166     PISSN: 00218596     EISSN: 14695146     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S002185960700754X     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. AHMAD, Q., RANA, M.A. & SIDDIQUI, S. U. H. (1991). Sunflower seed yield as influenced by some agronomic and seed characters. Euphytica 56, 137-142.
2. ALLKIN, R., MCFARLANE, T. D., WHITE, R. J., BISBY, F.A. & ADEY, M. E. (1983). Names and Synonyms of Species and Subspecies in the Vicieae. Issue 2 of the Vicieae Database Project. Publication No. 2. Southampton, UK: University of Southampton.
3. BAYE, T. & BECKER, H. C. (2005). Genetic variability and interrelationship of traits in the industrial oil crop Vernonia galamensis. Euphytica 142, 119-129.
4. BRIDGE, J. (2000). Nematodes of bananas and plantains in Africa: research trends and management strategies relating to the small-scale farmer. Acta Horticulturae 540, 391-408.
5. CAMPBELL, C. G., MEHRA, R. B., AGRAWAL, S. K., CHEN, Y. Z., EL MONEIM, A. M. A., KHAWAJA, H. I. T., YADOV, C. R., TAY, J.U. & ARAYA, W. A. (1994). Current status and future strategy in breeding grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Euphytica 37, 167-175.
6. DIZ, D. A., WOFFORD, D.S. & SCHANK, S. C. (1994). Correlation and path-coefficient analyses of seed-yield components in pearl milletrelephantgrass hybrids. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 89, 112-115.
7. EVERITT, B. S., LANDAU, S. & LEESE, M. (2001). Cluster Analysis, 4th edn. London: Edward Arnold.
8. FOX, J. (2006). Structural equation modeling with the sem package in R. Structural Equation Modeling 13, 465-486.
9. FRALEY, C. & RAFTERY, A. E. (1998). How many clusters? Which clustering method? Answers via model-based cluster analysis. The Computational Journal 41, 578-588.
10. FRALEY, C. & RAFTERY, A. E. (2002). Model-based clustering, discriminant analysis, and density estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 97(458), 611-631.
11. FRALEY, C. & RAFTERY, A. E. (2006). Model-based methods of classification: using the mclust software in chemometrics. Journal of Statistical Software 18(6).
12. GOZDOWSKI, D., KOZAK, M., KANG, M. S. & WYSZYŃSKI, Z. (2007). Dependence of grain weight of spring barley genotypes on traits of individual stems. Journal of Crop Improvement 21(1/2), 223-233.
13. GRAVOIS, K. A. (1998). Optimizing selection for rough rice yield, head rice, and total milled rice. Euphytica 101, 151-156.
14. GULER, M., ADAK, M. S. & ULUKAN, H. (2001). Determining relationships among yield and some yield components using path coefficient analysis in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). European Journal of Agronomy 14, 161-166.
15. JIAO, C.-J., XU, Q.-L., WANG, C.-Y., LI, F.-M., LI, Z.-X. & WANG, Y.-F. (2006). Accumulation pattern of toxin β-ODAP during lifespan and effect of nutrient elements on β-ODAP content in Lathyrus sativus seedlings. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 144, 369-375.
16. KOZAK, M. & KANG, M. S. (2006). Note on modern path analysis in application to crop science. Communications in Biometry and Crop Science 1, 32-34.
17. KOZAK, M. & MA̧DRY, W. (2006). Note on yield component analysis. Cereal Research Communications 34, 933-940.
18. LAMBEIN, F. & KUO, Y. H. (1997). Lathyrus sativus, a neolithic crop with a modern future? An overview of a present situation. In Lathyrus sativus - Cultivation and Nutritive Value in Animals and Human (Eds Instytut Żywienia Zwierza̧t & Ośrodek Doradztwa Rolniczego), pp. 6-11. Poland: Lublin-Radom.
19. MILCZAK, M., PȨDZIŃSKI, M., MNICHOWSKA, H., SZWED-URBAŚ, K. & RYBIŃSKI, W. (2001). Creative breeding of grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.) in Poland. Lathyrus Lathyrism Newsletter 2, 85-88.
20. MOHAMMADI, S. A., PRASANNA, B.M. & SINGH, N. N. (2003). Sequential path model for determining interrelationships among grain yield and related characters in maize. Crop Science 43, 1690-1697.
21. QUINN, G. P. & KEOUGH, M. J. (2002). Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22. RABIEI, B., VALIZADEH, M., GHAREYAZIE, B. & MOGHADDAM, M. (2004). Evaluation of selection indices for improving rice grain shape. Field Crops Research 89, 359-367.
23. R DEVELOPMENT CORE TEAM (2006). R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available online at http://www.et.bs.ehu. es/soft/fullrefman.pdf (verified 20/8/07).
24. RYBIŃSKI, W. (2003). Mutagenesis as a tool for improvement of traits in grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Lathyrus Lathyrism Newsletter 3, 27-31.
25. RYBIŃSKI, W. & BOCIANOWSKI, J. (2006). Variability of morphological traits and yield structure of grasspea mutants (Lathyrus sativus L.). Biuletyn Instytutu Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roslin 240/241, 291-297 (in Polish).
26. 1 progeny of grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Acta Agrophysica 62, 127-134.
27. SHAPIRO, S. S. &. WILK, M. B (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52, 591-611.
28. SHIPLEY, B. (1997). Exploratory path analysis with applications in ecology and evolution. American Naturalist 149, 1113-1138.
29. SHIPLEY, B. (2002). Cause and Correlation in Biology. A User's Guide to Path Analysis, Structural Equations and Causal Inference. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. SINGH, B. U., PADMAJA, P.G. & SEETHARAMA, N. (2004). Stability of biochemical constituents and their relationships with resistance to shoot fly, Atherigona soccata (Rondani) in seedling sorghum. Euphytica 136, 279-289.
31. TOPAL, A., AYDIN, C., AKGUN, N. & BABAOGLU, M. (2004). Diallel cross analysis in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.): identification of best parents for some kernel physical features. Field Crops Research 87, 1-12.
32. VARGAS, M., CROSSA, J., REYNOLDS, M. P., DHUNGANA, P. & ESKRIDGE, K.M. (2007). Structural equation modelling for studying genotype x environment interactions of physiological traits affecting yield in wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 145, 151-161.
33. VAZ PATTO, M. C., SKIBA, B., PANG, E. C. K., OCHATT, S. J., LAMBEIN, F. & RUBIALES, D. (2006). Lathyrus improvement for resistance against biotic and abiotic stresses: from classical breeding to marker assisted selection. Euphytica 147, 133-147.
34. WAGHMARE, V.N. & MEHRA, R. B. (2000). Induced mutations in grasspea (Lathyrus saticus L.). Lathyrus Lathyrism Newsletter 1, 21-24.
35. WRIGHT, S. (1921). Correlation and causation. Journal of Agricultural Research 20, 557-585.