Diagnostic performance of MRI relative to CT for metastatic nodes of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1626-1633

  Sumi, Misa ^a   Kimura, Yasuo ^a   Sumi, Tadateru ^a   Nakamura, Takashi ^a  

^a NAGASAKI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

CT; Head and neck; Lymph node; Metastasis; MRI

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HEAD AND NECK CARCINOMA; HUMAN; KERATINIZATION; MALE; NECROSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HEAD AND NECK NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ROC CURVE; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED;

EID: 37349053774     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21187     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Layland MK, Sessions DG, Lenox L. The influence of lymph node metastasis in the tr5eatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx and hypopharynx: NO versus N+. Laryngoscope 2005;115:629-639.
2. Anzai Y, Brunberg JA, Lufkin RB. Imaging of nodal metastases in the head and neck. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:774-783.
3. Silverman PM. Lymph node imaging: multidetector CT (MDCT). Cancer Imaging 2005;5:S57-67.
4. Suojanen JN, Mukherji SK, Dupuy DE, Takahashi JH, Costello P. Spiral CT in evaluation of head and neck lesions: work in progress. Radiology 1992;183:281-283.
5. Korkmaz H, Cerezci NG, Akmansu H, Dursun E. A comparison of spiral and conventional computerized tomography methods in diagnosing various laryngeal lesions. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1998;255:149-154.
6. Steinkamp HJ, Hosten N, Richter C, Schedel H, Felix R. Enlarged cervical lymph nodes at helical CT. Radiology 1994;191:795-798.
7. Eida S, Sumi M, Koichi Y, Kimura Y, Nakamura T. Combination of helical CT and Doppler sonography in the follow-up of patients with clinical NO stage neck disease and oral cancer. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:312-318.
8. Sumi M, Ohki M, Nakamura T. Comparison of sonography and CT for differentiating benign from malignant cervical lymph nodes in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:1019-1024.
9. King AD, Tse GMK, Ahuja AT, et al. Necrosis in metastatic neck nodes: diagnostic accuracy of CT, MR imaging, and US. Radiology 2004;230:720-726.
10. Curtin HD, Ishwaran H, Mancuso AA, Dalley RW, Caudry DJ, McNeil BJ. Comparison of CT and MR imaging in staging of neck metastases. Radiology 1998;207:123-130.
11. Don DM, Anzai Y, Lufkin RB, Fu YS, Calcaterra TC. Evaluation of cervical lymph node metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Laryngoscope 1995;105:669-674.
12. Chikui T, Yonetsu K, Nakamura T. Multivariate feature analysis of sonographic findings of metastatic cervical lymph nodes: contribution of blood flow features revealed by power Doppler sonography for predicting metastasis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:561-567.
13. Sumi M, Van Cauteren M, Nakamura T. MR microimaging of benign and malignant nodes in the neck. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:749-757.
14. Metz CE. ROC methodology in radiologic imaging. Invest Radiol 1986;21:720-733.
15. Hanley JA, McNell BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982;143:29-36.
16. van den Brekel MWM, Stel HV, Castelijns JA, et al. Cervical lymph node metastasis: assessment of radiologic criteria. Radiology 1990;177:379-384.
17. Nakamura T, Sumi M. Nodal imaging in the neck: recent advances in US, CT and MR imaging of metastatic nodes. Eur Radiol 2007;17:1235-1241.
18. Pitman KT. Sentinel node localization in head and neck tumors. Semin Nucl Med 2005;35:253-256.
19. Sumi M, Sakihama N, Sumi T, et al. Discrimination of metastatic cervical lymph nodes with diffusion-weighted MR imaging in patients with head and neck cancer. AJNR Am J Neuroraiol 2003;24:1627-1634.
20. King AD, Tse GMK, Yuen EHY, et al. Comparison of CT and MR imaging for the detection of extranodal neoplastic spread in metastatic neck nodes. Eur J Radiol 2004;52:264-270.
21. Anzai Y, Blackwell KE, Hirschowitz SL, et al. Initial clinical experience with dextran-coated superparamagnetic iron oxide for detection of lymph node metastases in patients with head and neck cancer. Radiology 1994;192:709-715.
22. Anzai Y, Prince MR. Iron oxide-enhanced MR lymphography: the evaluation of cervical lymph node metastases in head and neck cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:75-81.
23. Baghi M, Mack MG, Hambek M, et al. The efficacy of MRI with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particles (USPIO) in head and neck cancers. Anticancer Res 2005;25:3665-3670.
24. Matsuoka H, Nakamura A, Masaki T, et al. A prospective comparison between multidetector-row computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of rectal carcinoma. Am J Surg 2003;185:556-559.
25. Kawai Y, Sumi M, Nakamura T. Turbo short t inversion recovery imaging for metastatic node screening in patients with head and neck cancer. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1283-1287.
26. van den Brekel MWM. Lymph node metastases: CT and MRI. Eur J Radiol 2000;33:230-238.