Reflecting on practice or reflecting with practice?

Planning Theory and Practice

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 532-555

  Balducci, Alessandro ^a   Bertolini, Luca ^b  

^a Department of Architecture and Planning ^*  (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PLANNING PRACTICE; POLICY MAKING;

EID: 37349015328     PISSN: 14649357     EISSN: 1470000X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14649350701664770     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. McCulloch, A. (2000) Evaluations of a community regeneration project: case studies of Cruddas Park Development Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne. Journal of Social Policy, 29, pp. 97-419.
2. Robson, B., Bradford, M., Deas, I., Hall, E., Harrison, E., Parkinson, M., Evans, R., Garside, P., Harding, A. and Robinson, F. (1994) Assessing the Impact of Urban Policy, HMSO, London
3. Thomas, H. (2005) Pressures, purpose and collegiality in UK planning education. Planning Theory & Practice, 6:2, pp. 238-247.
4. Lindblom, C. E. and Cohen, D. K. (1979) Usable Knowledge. Social Science and Social Problem Solving, Yale University Press, New Haven
5. Kunzmann, K. R. (2004) Unconditional surrender. The gradual demise of European diversity in planning. PlanerIn, 4, pp. 5-7.
6. Boyer, E. L. (1990) Scholarship Reconsidered. Priorities of the Professoriate, Carnegie Foundation, New Jersey
7. Hambleton, R. (2006) Purpose and collegiality in planning education. An international perspective. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26:1, pp. 107-117.
8. Faludi, A. (1973) A Reader in Planning Theory, Pergamon Press, Oxford
9. Kolb, D. A. (1984) Experimental Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey
10. Thomas, H. (2005) Pressures, purpose and collegiality in UK planning education. Planning Theory & Practice, 6:2, pp. 238-246.
11. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, Sage, London
12. Healey, P. (2007) Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategy, Routledge, London
13. Lindblom, C. and Cohen, D. (1979) Usable Knowledge. Social Science and Social Problem Solving, Yale University Press, New Haven and London
14. Majone, G. (1989) Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process, Yale University Press, New Haven & London
15. Needham, B. (2000) Spatial planning as a design discipline: A paradigm for Western Europe?. Environment & Planning B, 27:3, pp. 437-453.
16. Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. (2001) Re-thinking Science. Knowledge and the Public in the Age of Uncertainty, Polity Press, Oxford
17. Klein, J. Thompson (2004) Prospects for transdisciplinarity. Futures, 36:4, pp. 515-526.
18. Klein, J. Thompson, Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Ḧberli, R., Bill, A., Scholz, R. W. and Welti, M. (2001) Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem Solving among Science, Technology, and Society: An Effective Way of Managing Complexity, Birkḧuser, Basel
19. Van Aken, J. E. (2004) Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: The quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. Journal of Management Studies, 41:2, pp. 219-246.
20. Van Aken, J. E. (2005) Management research as a design science: articulating research products of mode 2 knowledge production and management. British Journal of Management, 16:9, pp. 19-36.