Purpose and collegiality in planning education: An international perspective

Journal of Planning Education and Research

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 107-117

  Hambleton, Robin ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Performance measurement; Planning academics; Scholarship; Strategic planning

Indexed keywords

EID: 33747155584     PISSN: 0739456X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X06290936     Document Type: Note

References (34)

1. Atkinson, R. D. 2004. The past and future of America's economy. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
2. Balducci, A. 2005. Collegiality within a mass university system: Reflections from Italy. Planning Theory and Practice 6 (2): 249-251.
3. Bardach, E. 1977. The implementation game. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Barrett, S. 2004. Implementation studies: Time for a revival? Personal reflections on 20 years of implementation studies. Public Administration 82 (2): 249-262.
5. Barrett, S., and C. Fudge, eds. 1981. Policy and action. New York: Methuen.
6. Barrett, S., and M. Hill. 1984. Policy, bargaining and structure in implementation theory. Policy and Politics 12 (3): 219-240.
7. Boyer, E. L. 1990. Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. (Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation.
8. Bright, D. F., and M. P. Richards. 2001. The academic deanship: Individual careers and institutional roles. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Brukardt, M. J., B. Holland, S. L. Percy, and N. Zimpher. 2004. Calling the question: Is higher education ready to commit to community engagement? A Wingspread Statement 2004. Milwaukee, WI: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
10. Campbell, H. 2005. Reflexivity and the planning academic: Challenges and responsibilities. Planning Theory and Practice 6 (2): 235-237.
11. Checkoway, B. 1998. Professionally related public service as applied scholarship: Guidelines for the evaluation of planning faculty. Journal of Planning Education and Research 17 (4): 358-360.
12. Czarnecki, M. T. 1999. Managing by measuring. New York: American Management Association.
13. Elman, S. E., and S. M. Smock. 1985. Professional service and faculty rewards: Towards an integrated structure. Washington, DC: National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges.
14. Fainstein, S. 2005. Collegiality in US planning education. Planning Theory and Practice 6 (2): 251-253.
15. Frank, N. 2005. Documenting public service for promotion and tenure and program evaluation: Best practices and new directions. Paper presented at the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning Annual Conference, Kansas City, October.
16. Friedman, T. L. 2005. The world is flat: A brief history of the 21st Century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
17. Hambleton, R., and H. Thomas, eds. 1995. Urban policy evaluation: Challenge and change. London: Sage.
18. Hatry, H. P. 1999. Performance measurement: Getting results. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
19. Hill, M., and P. Hupe. 2002. Implementing public policy: Governance in theory and practice. London: Sage.
20. Ingram, H. 1990. Implementation: A review and suggested framework. In Public administration: The state of the discipline, edited by N. B. Lynn and A. Wildavsky. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
21. Johnston, R. 2005. On preparing for more subjective judgments. Perspectives 9 (4): 115-120.
22. Myers, D. 2004. How can planning schools be usefully compared? Journal of Planning Education and Research 24 (1): 25-26.
23. National Audit Office. 2003. Getting the evidence: Using research in policy making. London: Stationery Office.
24. Perry, D. C., and W. Wiewel, eds. 2005. The university as urban developer: Case studies and analysis. New York: M. E. Sharpe.
25. Punter J. 2002. Reflections on the 2001 United Kingdom research assessment exercise for town and country planning. Town Planning Review 73 (3): 333-349.
26. Pew Partnership. 2004. New directions in civic engagement: University Avenue meets Main Street. Charlottesville, VA: Pew Partnership for Civic Change.
27. Rhodes, F. H. T. 2001. The creation of the future: The role of the American university. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
28. Ringland, G. 1998. Scenario planning: Managing the future. New York: John Wiley.
29. Rodin, J. 2005. The 21st century urban university. Journal of the American Planning Association 71 (3): 237-249.
30. Schwarz, P. 1991. The art of the long view: Planning for the future in an uncertain world. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
31. Shepherd, J. 2005. MPs consider the RAE review. The Times Higher Education Supplement, November 25, 5-5.
32. Stiftel, B., D. Rukmana, and B. Alam. 2004. Faculty quality at US graduate planning schools: A National Research Council-style study. Journal of Planning Education and Research 24 (1): 6-22.
33. The brains business: A survey of higher education. 2005. The Economist, 10 September.
34. Thomas, H. 2005. Pressures, purpose and collegiality in UK planning education. Planning Theory and Practice 6 (2): 238-247.