Self-plagiarism: Oxymoron, fair use, or scientific misconduct?

Nursing Outlook

Volumn 52, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 273-274

  Broome, Marion E ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAM; DATA ANALYSIS; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; NURSING; UNITED STATES;

COPYRIGHT; EDITORIAL POLICIES; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMANS; NURSING RESEARCH; PLAGIARISM; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;

EID: 10944241449     PISSN: 00296554     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2004.10.001     Document Type: Editorial

References (7)

1. D. Goldblatt Self-plagiarism J Aesthetics Art Criticism 43 1984 71 78
2. S.P. Huntington Hassner's bad, bad review The National Interest 47 1997 97 103
3. V. Yank, D. Barnes Consensus and contention regarding redundant publication in clinical research a cross-section survey of editors and authors J Med Ethics 29 2003 109 114
4. N. Lowe Publication ethics copyright and self-plagiarism JOGNN 32 2003 145 146
5. P. Samuelson Self-plagiarism or fair use? Assoc Computing Machinery 37 1994 21 26
6. Copyright Law of the United States of America, 17 USC, Circular 92. Available at: www.copyright.gov/title17. Accessed October 11, 2004. p. 8.
7. More freedom for authors. Editor's Update. Issue 8, October, 2004.