The effect of corpus size in combining supervised and unsupervised training for disambiguation

COLING/ACL 2006 - 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Main Conference Poster Sessions

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 25-32

  Atterer, Michaela ^a   Schütze, Hinrich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

COMBINED SYSTEM; CORPUS SIZE; LEXICAL STATISTICS; PERFORMANCE; PREPOSITIONAL PHRASE; RELATIVE CLAUSE; SUPERVISED AND UNSUPERVISED LEARNING; SUPERVISED TRAININGS; UNSUPERVISED TRAINING; WALL STREET JOURNAL;

UNSUPERVISED LEARNING;

EID: 37249002913     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Michaela Atterer and Hinrich Schütze. 2006. A lattice-based framework for enhancing statistical parsers with information from unlabeled corpora. In CoNLL.
2. Daniel M. Bikel. 2004. Intricacies of Collins' parsing model. Computational Linguistics, 30(4):479-511.
3. Hiram Calvo, Alexander Gelbukh, and Adam Kilgarriff. 2005. Distributional thesaurus vs. WordNet: A comparison of backoff techniques for unsupervised PP attachment. In CICLing.
4. Eugene Charniak. 1997. Statistical parsing with a context-free grammar and word statistics. In AAAI/IAAI, pages 598-603.
5. Michael Collins and James Brooks. 1995. Prepositional attachment through a backed-off model. In Third Workshop on Very Large Corpora. Association for Computational Linguistics.
6. Michael Collins. 1997. Three generative, lexicalised models for statistical parsing. In ACL.
7. Donald Hindle and Mats Rooth. 1993. Structural ambiguity and lexical relations. Computational Linguistics, 19(1):103-120.
8. Rebecca Hwa, Miles Osborne, Anoop Sarkar, and Mark Steedman. 2003. Corrected co-training for statistical parsers. In Workshop on the Continuum from Labeled to Unlabeled Data in Machine Learning and Data Mining, ICML.
9. Mark Johnson and Stefan Riezler. 2000. Exploiting auxiliary distributions in stochastic unification-based grammars. In NAACL.
10. David D. Lewis, Yiming Yang, Tony G. Rose, and Fan Li. 2004. RCV1: A new benchmark collection for text categorization research. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 5.
11. Dekang Lin. 1998. Dependency-based evaluation of MINIPAR. In Workshop on the Evaluation of Parsing Systems, Granada, Spain.
12. LingPipe. 2006. http://www.aliasi.com/lingpipe/.
13. Lucene. 2006. http://lucene.apache.org.
14. Mitchell P. Marcus, Beatrice Santorini, and Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a large natural language corpus of English: the Penn treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19:313-330.
15. Adwait Ratnaparkhi, Jeff Reynar, and Salim Roukos. 1994. A maximum entropy model for prepositional phrase attachment. In HLT.
16. Helmut Schmid. 2002. Lexicalization of probabilistic grammars. In Coling.
17. Advaith Siddharthan. 2002a. Resolving attachment and clause boundary ambiguities for simplifying relative clause constructs. In Student Research Workshop, ACL.
18. Advaith Siddharthan. 2002b. Resolving relative clause attachment ambiguities using machine learning techniques and wordnet hierarchies. In 4th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphora Resolution Colloquium.
19. Kristina Toutanova, Christopher D. Manning, and Andrew Y. Ng. 2004. Learning random walk models for inducing word dependency distributions. In ICML.
20. Martin Volk. 2001. Exploiting the WWW as a corpus to resolve pp attachment ambiguities. In Corpus Linguistics 2001.
21. Web Appendix. 2006. http://www.ims.unistuttgart.de/∼schuetze/colingacl06/apdx.html.
22. Ian H. Witten, Alistair Moffat, and Timothy C. Bell. 1999. Managing Gigabytes: Compressing and Indexing Documents and Images. Morgan Kaufman.
23. Alexander S. Yeh and Marc B. Vilain. 1998. Some properties of preposition and subordinate conjunction attachments. In Coling.