Physics faculty beliefs and values about the teaching and learning of problem solving. II. Procedures for measurement and analysis

Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2007, Pages

  Henderson, Charles ^a,b   Yerushalmi, Edit ^b,c   Kuo, Vince H ^d,e   Heller, Kenneth ^d   Heller, Patricia ^d  

^a WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b University of Minnesota   (United States)

^c WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^e Department of Geology and Geological Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 37249037425     PISSN: 15549178     EISSN: 15549178     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020110     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. E. F. Redish, Teaching Physics with the Physics Suite (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2003).
2. A. G. Thompson, in Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, edited by D. A. Grouws (MacMillan, New York, 1992), pp. 127-146.
3. M. Prosser and K. Trigwell, Understanding Learning and Teaching: The Experience in Higher Education (St. Edmundsbury Press, Great Britain, 1999).
4. D. Kember and K. P. Kwan, in Teacher Thinking, Beliefs and Knowledge in Higher Education, edited by N. Hative and P. Goodyear (Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2002), p. 219.
5. K. Samuelowicz and J. D. Bain, Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers, Res. Higher Educ. 24, 93 (1992).
6. J. G. Donald, Professors' and students' conceptualizations of the learning task in introductory physics courses, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 30, 905 (1993).
7. C. Henderson and M. Dancy, in Proceedings (peer reviewed) of the 2004 AAPT Physics Education Research Conference, edited by S. Franklin, J. Marx, and P. Heron (American Institute of Physics, Melville, NY, 2005).
8. E. Yerushalmi, C. Henderson, K. Heller, P. Heller, and V. Kuo, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 020109 (2007).
9. L. Anschuetz and S. Rosenbaum, in Proceedings of 2003 Conference for Human-Computer Interaction (Association for Computing Machinery, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, 2003).
10. J. Simonsen and F. Kensing, Commun. ACM 40, 82 (1997).
11. D. Gilmore, Business: Understanding and overcoming resistance to enthographic design research, Interactions 9, 29 (2002).
12. M. E. Raven and A. Flanders, Using contextual inquiry to learn about your audiences, SIGDOC Asterisk J. Comput. Doc. 20, 1 (1996).
13. L. E. Wood, Semi-structured interviewing for user-centered design, Interactions 4, 48 (1997).
14. M. Ozer, A survey of new product evaluation models - Concepts. Methods and Strategy, Prod. Invent. Manage. J. 16, 77 (1999).
15. H. Beyer and K. Holtzblatt, Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 1998).
16. S. Wilcox and W. Reese, Medical Device Diagnostic Ind. http://www.devicelink.com/mddi/01/09.html 68 (2001).
17. J. Piaget, The Child's Conception of the World (Harcourt, Brace, New York, 1929).
18. J. Piaget, The Child's Conception of Movement and Speed (Routledge, London, 1970).
19. R. Driver and J. Easley, Stud. Sci. Educ. 5, 61 (1978).
20. R. Driver, E. Guense, and A. Tiberghien, Children's Ideas in Science (Open University Press, Buckingham, UK, 1985).
21. F. Reif, Millikan Lecture 1994: Understanding and teaching important scientific thought processes, Am. J. Phys. 63, 17 (1995).
22. D. Maloney, in Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning, edited by D. Gabel (MacMillan, New York, 1994).
23. J. P. Mestre, R. J. Dufrense, W. J. Gerace et al., Promoting skilled problem-solving behavior among beginning physics students, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 30, 303 (1993).
24. A. Van Heuvelen, Overview, Case Study Physics, Am. J. Phys. 59, 898 (1991).
25. P. Heller and M. Hollabaugh, Teaching problem solving through cooperative group. Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups, Am. J. Phys. 60, 637 (1992).
26. P. Heller, R. Keith, and S. Anderson, Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 1: Group versus individual problem solving, Am. J. Phys. 60, 627 (1992).
27. R. J. Shavelson and P. Stern, Research on Teachers' Pedagogical Thoughts, Judgments, Decisions, and Behavior, Rev. Educ. Res. 51, 455 (1981).
28. H. L. Swanson, J. E. O'Connor, and J. B. Cooney, An Information Processing Analysis of Expert and Novice Teachers' Problem Solving, Am. Educ. Res. J. 27, 533 (1990).
29. K. S. Cushing, D. S. Sabers, and D. C. Berliner, Olympic Gold: Investigations of Expertise in Teaching, Educ. Horiz. 70, 108 (1992).
30. C. LeMaistre, What is an expert instructional designer? Evidence of expert performance during formative evaluationEduc. Technol. Res. Dev. 46, 21 (1998).
31. Farnham-Diggory, Paradigms of Knowledge and Instruction, Rev. Educ. Res. 64, 463 (1994).
32. R. Zajchowski and J. Martin, Differences in the problem solving of stronger and weaker novices in physics: Knowledge, strategies, or knowledge structure?, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 30, 459 (1993).
33. A. Van Heuvelen, Learning to think like a physicist: A review of research-based instructional strategies, Am. J. Phys. 59, 891 (1991).
34. C. Henderson, E. Yerushalmi, V. Kuo et al., Grading Student Problem Solutions: The Challenge of Sending a Consistent Message, Am. J. Phys. 72, 164 (2004).
35. R. J. Menges and W. C. Rando, What are your assumptions? Improving instruction by examining theories. College Teaching 37, 54 (1989).
36. C. Argyris and D. A. Schon, Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1974).
37. M. T. Chi, P. J. Feltovich, and R. Glaser, Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices, Cogn. Sci. 5, 121 (1981).
38. J. W. Creswell, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1998).
39. S. B. Merriam, Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1998).
40. C. Moustakas, Phenomenological Research Methods (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1994).
41. A. L. Strauss and J. Corbin, Basics of Qualitative Reseacrh: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 1990).
42. A. L. Strauss, Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987).
43. M. B. Miles and A. M. Huberman, Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourrebook (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1994).
44. J. D. Novak and D. B. Gowin, Learning How to Learn (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1984).
45. R. H. Hycner, Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data, Hum. Stud. 8, 279 (1985).
46. Y. S. Lincoln and E. G. Guba, Naturalistic Inquiry (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, 1985).
47. L. McDermott, Guest Comment: How we teach and how students learn - A mismatch?, Am. J. Phys. 61, 295 (1993).
48. C. Henderson, K. Heller, P. Heller, V. Kuo, and E. Yerushalmi, in Proceedings of the 2001 Physics Education Research Conference, edited by S. Franklin, K. Cummings, and J. Marx (PERC Publishing, Loudonville, NY, 2001), pp. 79-82.
49. C. Henderson, K. Heller, P. Heller, V. Kuo, and E. Yerushalmi, in Proceedings of the 2002 Physics Education Research Conference, edited by S. Franklin, K. Cummings, and J. Marx (PERC Publishing, Loudonville, NY, 2002), pp. 31-34.
50. V. Kuo, K. Heller, P. Heller, C. Henderson, and E. Yerushalmi, in Proceedings of the 2001 Physics Education Research Conference, edited by S. Franklin, K. Cummings, and J. Marx (PERC Publishing, Loudonville, NY, 2001), pp. 87-90.
51. V. Kuo, K. Heller, P. Heller, C. Henderson, and E. Yerushalmi, in Proceedings of the 2002 Physics Education Research Conference, edited by S. Franklin, K. Cummings, and J. Marx (PERC Publishing, Loudonville, NY, 2002), pp. 35-38.
52. P. Heller, K. Heller, C. Henderson, V. Kuo, and E. Yerushalmi, in Proceedings of the 2001 Physics Education Research Conference, edited by S. Franklin, K. Cummings, and J. Marx (PERC Publishing, Loudonville, NY, 2001), pp. 71-74.