Conceptual fingerprints: Lexical decomposition by means of frames - A neuro-cognitive model

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4604 LNAI, Issue , 2007, Pages 415-428

  Petersen, Wiebke ^a   Werning, Markus ^a  

^a HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NEURAL NETWORKS; RECURSIVE FUNCTIONS; SYNCHRONIZATION;

ATTRIBUTE-VALUE STRUCTURES; COGNITIVE FRAMES; COGNITIVELY ADEQUATE DECOMPOSITION;

PATTERN RECOGNITION;

EID: 37249012523     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-73681-3_31     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Barsalou, L.W.: Frames, concepts, and conceptual fields. In: Lehrer, A., Kittay, E.F. (eds.) Frames, fields, and contrasts, pp. 21-74. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (1992)
2. Carpenter, B.: The logic of typed feature structures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)
3. Fillmore, C.J.: Frame semantics. In: Linguistics in the morning calm, pp. 111-137. Hanshin Publishing Co. Seoul (1982)
4. Gray, C., König, P., Engel, A.K., Singer, W.: Oscilliatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization which reflects global stimulus properties. Nature 338, 334-337 (1989)
5. Gray, C., König, P., Engel, A.K., Singer, W.: Oscilliatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization which reflects global stimulus properties. Nature 338, 334-337 (1989)
6. Guarino, N.: Concepts, attributes and arbitrary relations: some linguistic and ontological criteria for structuring knowledge bases. Data Knowl. Eng. 8(3), 249-261 (1992)
7. Hubel, D.H., Wiesel, T.N.: Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. Journal of Physiology 195, 215-243 (1968)
8. Kilbury, J., Petersen, W., Rumpf, C.: Inheritance-based models of the lexicon. In: Wunderlich, D. (ed.) Advances in the theory of the lexicon, pp. 429-477. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin (2006)
9. Löbner, S.: Definites. Journal of Semantics 4(4), 279-326 (1985)
10. Maye, A., Werning, M.: Temporal binding of non-uniform objects. Neurocomputing 58-60, 941-948 (2004)
11. Minsky, M.: A framework for representing knowledge. In: Winston, P.H. (ed.) The psychology of computer vision, McGraw-Hill, New York (1975)
12. Ortmann, A.: (In) Alienabilitätssplits und die Typologie der adnominalen Possession (Manuscript, University of Düsseldorf) (2006)
13. Petersen, W.: FCAType - a system for type signature induction. In: Yahia, S.B., Nguifo, E.M. (eds.) 4th international conference on concept lattices and their applications (2006)
14. Petersen, W.: Inducing type signatures from decomposition lattices. International Journal of Foundations of Computer Science, 2007 (submitted)
15. Schulen, T.B., König, P.: Binding by temporal structure in multiple feature domains of an oscillatory neuronal network. Biological Cybernetics 70, 397-405 (1994)
16. Singer, W.: Neuronal synchrony: A versatile code for the definition of relations? Neuron 24, 49-65 (1999)
17. Smith, E.E., Medin, D.L.: Categories and concepts. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1981)
18. Smith, J.D., Minda, J.: Thirty categorization results in search of a model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 26(1), 3-27 (2000)
19. Sowa, J.: Conceptual structures. Addison-Wesley, Reading MA (1984)
20. Treisman, A.: The binding problem. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 6, 171-178 (1996)
21. von der Malsburg, C: The correlation theory of brain function (Internal Report Nos. 81-2). MPI for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen (1981)
22. Werning, M.: Ventral vs. dorsal pathway: the source of the semantic object/event and the syntactic noun/verb distinction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26(3), 299-300 (2003)
23. Werning, M.: The temporal dimension of thought: Cortical foundations of predicative representation. Synthese 146(1/2), 203-224 (2005)
24. Werning, M., Maye, A.: Frames, coherency chains and hierarchical binding: The cortical implementation of complex concepts. In: Bara, B.G., Barsalou, L., Bucciarelli, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the twenty-seventh annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 2347-2352. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ (2005)
25. Werning, M., Maye, A.: The neural basis of the object concept in ambiguous and illusionary perception. In: Sun, R., Miyake, N. (eds.) Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 876-881. Erlbaum, London (2006)
26. Werning, M., Maye, A.: The cortical implementation of complex attribute and substance concepts: Synchrony, frames, and hierarchical binding. Chaos and Complexity Letters 2(2) 2007 (in press)
27. Woods, W.A.: What's in a link: Foundations for semantic networks. In: Bobrow, D.G., Collins, A.M. (eds.) Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science, Academic Press, New York (1975)