Child Support: Law and Policy

Child Support: Law and Policy

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-525

  Wikeley, Nick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 37149041557     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (125)

1. J Finch and J Mason, Passing On: Kinship and Inheritance in England (Routledge, London, 2000).
2. J Pahl, Money and Marriage (Macmillan, Basingstoke, 1989)
3. C Vogler and J Pahl, 'Money, power and inequality within marriage' (1994) 42 Sociological Review 263.
4. G Douglas and N Lowe, 'Becoming a Parent in English Law' (1992) 108 Law Quarterly Review 414 at 414.
5. JL Hill, 'What does it mean to be a "parent"? The claims of biology as the basis for parental rights' (1991) 66 New York University Law Review 353 at 353.
6. B Hall, 'The Origin of Parental Rights' (1999) 13 Public Affairs Quarterly 73.
7. T Bayne and A Kolers, 'Towards a Pluralist Account of Parenthood' (2003) 17 Bioethics 221 at 241.
8. A Kolers and T Bayne, '"Are You My Mommy?" On the Genetic Basis of Parenthood' (2001) 18 Journal of Applied Philosophy 274
9. G Fuscaldo, 'Genetic Ties: Are They Morally Binding?' (2006) 20 Bioethics 64.
10. J Eekelaar, 'The Emergence of Children's Rights' (1986) 6 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 161.
11. S Altman, 'A Theory of Child Support' (2003) 17 International Journal of Law Policy and the Family 173 at 174, n 4
12. MA Goodman, IA Oberman and PL Wheat, 'Rights and Obligations of Child Support' (1975) 7 Southwestern University Law Review 36.
13. S Sheldon, ' "Sperm bandits", birth control and the battle of the sexes' (2001) 21 Legal Studies 460 at 480.
14. P Vallentyne, 'Equality and the Duties of Procreators' in Archard and Macleod, n 19 above, ch 11 at 208.
15. J Eekelaar, 'Are Parents Morally Obliged to Care for Their Children?' (1991) 11 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 340 at 343-7
16. S Sheldon, 'Unwilling Fathers and Abortion: Terminating Men's Child Support Obligations?' (2003) 66 Modern Law Review 175.
17. S Uttley, 'Child Support: the Limits of Social Policy Based on Assumptions of Knavery' (1999) 33 Social Policy & Administration 552 at 558.
18. NC Schaeffer, 'Principles of Justice in Judgments About Child Support' (1990) 69(1) Social Forces 157 at 158.
19. J Finch, Family Obligations and Social Change (Polity Press, Oxford, 1989) at 242.
20. J Finch and J Mason, Negotiating Family Responsibilities (Routledge, London, 1993) at 168-69.
21. JE Crowley, The Politics of Child Support in America (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003).
22. HD Krause, 'Child Support Reassessed: Limits of private responsibility and the public interest' (1989) University of Illinois Law Review 367 at 375.
23. J tenBroek, 'California's Dual System of Family Law: Its Origins, Development, and Present Status' (1964) 16 Stanford Law Review 257 at 261.
24. M Finer and OR McGregor, 'The History of the Obligation to Maintain' in Report of the Committee on One-Parent Families (Cmnd 5629, 1974: the 'Finer Report'), vol 2, Appendix 5, at 111.
25. A Blaikie, 'Nuclear hardship or variant dependency? Households and the Scottish Poor Law' (2002) 17 Continuity and Change 253 at 275.
26. L Charlesworth, 'The Poor Law: a legal analysis' (1999) 6 Journal of Social Security Law 79.
27. JR Poynter, Society and Pauperism: English Ideas on Poor Relief, 1795-1834 (Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1969) at 1.
28. ME Rose, 'The Crisis of Poor Relief in England, 1860-1890' in WJ Mommsen (ed), The emergence of the welfare state in Britain and Germany 1850-1950 (Croom Helm, London, 1981) and Lees n 6 above at 16.
29. P Slack, From Reformation to Improvement: Public Welfare in Early Modern England (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1999) at 16-17.
30. O Kahn-Freund, 'Blackstone's Neglected Child: the Contract of Employment' (1977) 93 Law Quarterly Review 508 at 518.
31. HH Robbins and F Deák, 'The Familial Property Right of Illegitimate Children: A Comparative Study' (1930) 30 Columbia Law Review 308 at 317
32. D Marshall, The English Poor in the Eighteenth Century (George Routledge & Sons Ltd, London, 1926) at 207.
33. GR Quaife, Wanton Wenches and Wayward Wives: Peasants and Illicit Sex in Early Seventeenth Century England (Croom Helm, London, 1979) at 216-17.
34. MA Crowther, 'Family Responsibility and State Responsibility in Britain before the Welfare State' (1982) 25 Historical Journal 131-45.
35. O McGregor, L Blom-Cooper and C Gibson, Separated spouses: a study of the matrimonial jurisdiction of magistrates' courts (Duckworth, London, 1970) at 33
36. L Neville Brown, 'Maintenance and Esoterism' (1968) 31 Modern Law Review 121 at 121.
37. K McK Norrie, The Law Relating to Parent and Child in Scotland (W Green, Edinburgh, 1999, 2nd edn) at 411
38. W Morrison (ed), Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England vol I (Cavendish Publishing, London, 2001) ch 16 at 343.
39. LA Pollock, 'Parent-Child Relations' in DI Kertzer and M Barbagli (eds), Family Life in Early Modern Times 1500-1789 (Yale University Press, New Haven, 2001) ch 7 at 191
40. A Pottage, 'Proprietary Strategies: The Legal Fabric of Aristocratic Settlements' (1998) 61 Modern Law Review 162.
41. J Eekelaar, 'Family Law and Social Control' in J Eekelaar and J Bell (ed), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence; Third Series (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1987), ch 6 at 136.
42. WS Holdsworth, A History of English Law, vol III (Methuen & Co, London, 1923, 3rd edn) at 510.
43. F Pollock and FW Maitland, The History of English Law (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1898, 2nd edn) at 438.
44. OR McGregor, Family Breakdown and Social Policy (British Academy, London, 1974) at 12.
45. McGregor et al, n 52 above, at 22.
46. J Lewis, 'Lone Mothers: the British case' in J Lewis (ed), Lone Mothers in European Welfare Regimes (Jessica Kingsley, London, 1997) ch 2.
47. J Lewis, 'Lone Mothers: the British case' in J Lewis (ed), Lone Mothers in European Welfare Regimes (Jessica Kingsley, London, 1997) ch 2, at 55.
48. J Harris, William Beveridge: A Biography (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1997, revd edn) at 395.
49. DC Marsh, National Insurance and National Assistance in Great Britain (Pitman & Sons Ltd, London, 1950) at 150.
50. Birkett LJ, the change made by the 1948 Act 'was really quite revolutionary', National Assistance Board v Parkes [1955] 2 QB 506, CA, at 519.
51. G Douglas, An Introduction to Family Law (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2004, 2nd edn) at 74.
52. M Thatcher, The Downing Street years (Harper Collins, London, 1995) at 630.
53. N Timmins, The Five Giants: A Biography of the Welfare State (Harper Collins, London, revised edn, 2001) at 450.
54. H Barnes, P Day and N Cronin, Trial and error: a review of UK child support policy (FPSC Occasional paper 24, London, 1998) at 24.
55. J Bradshaw and J Millar, Lone Parent Families in the UK (DSS Research Report 6, London, 1991) at 31.
56. JJ Rodger, Family Life and Social Control (Macmillan, Basingstoke, 1995) at 126.
57. A Diduck, 'The Unmodified Family: The Child Support Act and the Construction of Legal Subjects' (1995) 22 Journal of Law and Society 527.
58. C Harlow, 'Accountability, New Public Management, and the Problems of the Child Support Agency' (1999) 26 Journal of Law and Society 150 at 158.
59. G Davis, N Wikeley and R Young, Child Support in Action (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 1998) at 8-9.
60. J Bradshaw, C Stimson, C Skinner and J Williams, Absent fathers? (Routledge, London, 1999) at 125.
61. M Maclean and J Eekelaar, 'Child Support: The British Solution' (1993) International Journal of Law and the Family 205 at 225.
62. J Resnick, 'Categorical Federalism: Jurisdiction, Gender, and the Globe' (2001) 111 Yale Law Journal 619
63. SA Riesenfeld, 'The Formative Era Of American Public Assistance Law' (1955) 43 Californian Law Review 175.
64. MA Mason, From Father's Property to Children's Rights: The History of Child Custody in the United States (Columbia University Press, New York, 1994) at 25.
65. HD Krause, 'Child Support Reassessed: Limits of Private Responsibility and the Public Interest' (1989) University of Illinois Law Review 367 at 370.
66. HD Krause, Child Support in America: the legal perspective (Charlottesville, Michie & Co, 1981) at 307-11.
67. DH Bell, 'Child Support Orders: The Federal State Partnership-Part I' (1999) 69 Mississippi Law Journal 597 at 599.
68. LW Morgan, 'The federalization of child support a shift in the ruling paradigm: child support as outside the contours of "family law"' (1999) 16 Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers 195 at 203.
69. JE Crowley, 'The Gentrification of Child Support Enforcement Services, 1950-1984' (2003) 77 Social Service Review 585 at 586
70. RG Kreuger, Analyzing the Development of the American Child Support System (Writers Club Press, Lincoln, NE, 2001) at 125-28.
71. JC Murphy, 'Eroding the myth of discretionary justice in family law: the child support experiment' (1991) 70 North Carolina Law Review 209.
72. A Benson, 'Child support reforms in the United Kingdom and the United States' in J Bradshaw (ed), Children and Social Security (Ashgate, Aldershot, 2003), ch 3.2.
73. J Kunz, P Villeneuve and I Garfinkel, 'Child support among selected OECD countries: a comparative analysis' in Vleminickx and Smeeding, n 57 above, ch 19 at 492.
74. A Harding and A Szukalska, Trends in child poverty in Australia: 1982 to 1995-96 (NCSEM Discussion Paper No 42, Canberra, 1999).
75. S Kelly and A Harding, Love can hurt, divorce will cost (AMP/NATSEM Income and Wealth Report Issue 10, 2005).
76. S Cretney, JM Masson and R Bailey-Harris, Principles of Family Law (Sweet & Maxwell, London, 7th edn, 2002) at 320.
77. M Letts, 'Children: The Continuing Duty to Maintain' [2001] Fam Law 839.
78. B Smyth, 'Child support for young adult children in Australia' (2002) 16 International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 22.
79. N Lowe and G Douglas, Bromley's Family Law (Butterworths, London, 9th edn, 1998) at 766.
80. R Hadwen and K Pawling, Child support handbook (CPAG, London, 13th edn, 2005/2006) at 47.
81. K Clarke, G Craig and C Glendinning, 'Money Isn't Everything: Fiscal Policy and Family Policy in the Child Support Act' (1995) 29 Social Policy and Administration 26
82. R Boden and M Childs, 'Paying for Procreation: Child support arrangements in the UK' (1996) 4 Feminist Legal Studies 131 at 147.
83. K Kiernan and K Smith, 'Unmarried parenthood: new insights from the Millennium Cohort Study' (2003) 114 Population Trends 26 at 27.
84. R Pickford, Fathers, marriage and the law (FPSC, London, 1999).
85. N Myricks, 'DNA Testing and Child Support: Can the Truth Really Set You Free?' (2003) 17 American Journal of Family Law 31 at 35.
86. K Santillo, 'Disestablishment of paternity and the future of child support obligations' (2003) 37 Family Law Quarterly 503.
87. P Roberts, 'Truth and Consequences: Part III. Who Pays When Paternity is Disestablished?' (2003) 37 Family Law Quarterly 69.
88. N Lee 'The Working Families' Tax Credit: An integration of the tax and benefits systems?' (2000) 7 Journal of Social Security Law 159.
89. N Wikeley and A Ogus, The Law of Social Security (Butterworths, London, 5th edn, 2002) at 320.
90. R Hadwen and K Pawling, Child Support Handbook 2005/2006 (CPAG, London, 13th edn, 2005) at 97.
91. SD Sugarman, ' Roe v Norton: Coerced Maternal Cooperation' in RH Mnookin (ed), In the Interest of Children (New York: WH Freeman, 1985) chs 16-18, at 374
92. JM Fontana, 'Co-operation and Good Cause: Greater Sanctions and the Failure to Account for Domestic Violence' (2000) 15 Wisconsin Women's Law Journal 367 at 371.
93. LR Keiser and J Soss, 'With Good Cause: Bureaucratic Discretion and the Politics of Child Support Enforcement' (1998) 42 Am J of Political Science 1133 at 1138
94. V Peacey and L Rainford, Attitudes towards child support and knowledge of the Child Support Agency, 2004 (DWP Research Report No 226, London, 2004) at 14.
95. N Wikeley et al, National Survey of Child Support Agency Clients (DWP Research Report No 152, London, 2001) at 154-55.
96. P Legler, Low-Income Fathers and Child Support: Starting Off on the Right Track (Policy Studies Inc, Denver, Colorado, 2003) at 25.
97. V Peacey and L Rainford, Attitudes towards child support and knowledge ofthe Child Support Agency (DWP Research report No 226, London) at 26.
98. N Wikeley et al, National Survey of Child Support Agency Clients (DWP Research report No 152, 2001) at 157-58.
99. JT Oldham, 'Lessons from the New English and Australian Child Support Systems' (1996) 29 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 691 at 719.
100. Nicholas Mostyn QC, 'The Green Paper on Child Support-Children First: a new approach to child support' [1999] Fam Law 95 at 98.
101. M Freedland, The Personal Employment Contract (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003), at 20-21.
102. E Jacobs and G Douglas, Child Support: The Legislation (Sweet & Maxwell, London, Edition Seven, 2005/2006) at 112.
103. K Mullan, 'Supersession-the one true interpretation?' (2004) 11 Journal of Social Security Law 148 at 155
104. N Wikeley, 'Decision making and appeals under the Social Security Act 1998' (1998) 5 Journal of Social Security Law 104
105. E Jacobs and G Douglas, Child Support: The Legislation (Sweet & Maxwell, London, Edition Seven 2005/2006) at 410.
106. N Wikeley, 'Burying Bell: Managing the Judicialisation of Social Security Tribunals' (2000) 63 Modern Law Review 475.
107. H Genn, 'Tribunals and Informal Justice' (1993) 56 Modern Law Review 393 at 398.
108. J Baldwin, N Wikeley and R Young, Judging Social Security (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1992), ch 4
109. H Genn, B Lever and L Gray, Tribunals for diverse users (DCA research report 1/2006 (DCA, London, 2006).
110. S Webb and B Webb, English Poor Law History-Part 1: The Old Poor Law (Longmans, Green & Co, London, 1927, repr Frank Cass & Co Ltd, 1963) at 309.
111. N Wikeley et al, National Survey of Child Support Agency Clients (DWP Research Report No 152, 2001) at 95-99.
112. R Hadwen and K Pawling, Child support handbook (CPAG, 13th edn, 2005/2006), at 464.
113. K Puttick, Child Support Law (Emis Professional Publishing, 2003), at 322.
114. N Harden, 'Child Support Enforcement' (2003) 16 Australian Family Lawyer 13 at 15.
115. N Wikeley, 'Child Support-Back to the Drawing Board' (2006) 36 Family Law 312
116. J Baldwin, Evaluating the Effectiveness of Enforcement Procedures in Undefended Claims in the Civil Courts (LCD Research series, Report No 3/03, London, 2003) at 5.
117. HM Treasury, 2004 Spending Review: Public Service Agreements 2005-2008 (Cm 6238, 2004) at 37.
118. J Bradshaw and J Millar, Lone Parent Families in the UK (DSS Research Report No 6, London, 1991) at 38
119. A Marsh and S Vegeris, The British Lone Parent Cohort and their Children 1991 to 2001 (dWP Research Report No 209, 2004) at 62.
120. I Walker and Y Zhu, Child Support Liability and Partnership Dissolution (IFS WP04/18, London, 2004)
121. LA Nixon, 'The Effect of Child Support Enforcement on Marital Dissolution' (1997) 32 Journal of Human Resources 159
122. W Sigle-Rushton, J Hobcraft and K Kiernan, 'Parental Divorce and Subsequent Disadvantage: A Cross-Cohort Comparison' (2005) 42 Demography 427.
123. C-C Huang and W-J Han, 'Perceptions of child support and sexual activity of adolescent males' (2004) 27 Journal of Adolescence 731.
124. N Lyon, M Barnes and D Sweiry, FACS (DWP Research Report No 340, 2006), ch 15 at 313.
125. J Lewis, 'Women, Men and the Family' in A Seldon, The Blair Effect (Little, Brown, London, 2001), ch 22 at 497.