GM crops in Europe: How much value and for whom?;Les cultures génétiquement modifiées en Europe: Quels avantages et pour qui?

EuroChoices

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 46-53

  Demont, Matty ^a,b   Dillen, Koen ^b   Mathijs, Erik ^b   Tollens, Eric ^b  

^a Centre du riz pour l'Afrique Senegal   (Senegal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETITIVENESS; CROP; CULTIVATION; EUROPEAN UNION; GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISM; STAKEHOLDER;

CENTRAL EUROPE; CZECH REPUBLIC; EURASIA; EUROPE; HUNGARY; SOUTHERN EUROPE; SPAIN;

BETA VULGARIS SUBSP. VULGARIS; BRASSICA NAPUS; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 37049036411     PISSN: 14780917     EISSN: 1746692X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-692X.2007.00075.x     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Demont, M. (2006). Economic impact of agricultural biotechnology in the European Union: Transgenic sugar beet and maize. Dissertationes de agricultura no. 713, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven.
2. Demont, M., Cerovska, M., Daems, W., Dillen, K., Fogarasi, J., Mathijs, E., Muška, F., Soukup, J. and Tollens, E. Ex ante impact assessment under imperfect information: GM technologies in the New Member States of the EU. Journal of Agricultural Economics (forthcoming).
3. Demont, M. and Tollens, E. (2004a). Ex ante welfare effects of agricultural biotechnology in the European Union: The case of transgenic herbicide tolerant sugarbeet. In: Evenson, R.E. and Santaniello, V., (eds), The Regulation of Agricultural Biotechnology, Wallingford, UK: CAB International, pp. 239-255.
4. Demont, M. and Tollens, E. (2004B). First impact of biotechnology in the EU: Bt maize adoption in Spain. Annals of Applied Biology, 145(2004b): 197-207.
5. Demont, M., Wesseler, J. and Tollens, E. (2004). Biodiversity versus transgenic sugar beet: The one Euro question. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 31: 1-18.
6. Dillen, K., Demont, M. and Tollens, E. (2007). Global welfare effects of genetically modified sugar beet under changing EU sugar trade policies, Working paper no. 100, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven.
7. Falck-Zepeda, J.B., Traxler, G. and Nelson, R.G. (1999). Rent creation and distribution from the first three years of planting Bt cotton. ISAAA briefs no. 14, ISAAA, Ithaca, NY.
8. Falck-Zepeda, J.B., Traxler, G. and Nelson, R.G. (2000a). Rent creation and distribution from biotechnology innovations: The case of Bt cotton and herbicide-tolerant soybeans in 1997. Agribusiness, 16: 21-32.
9. Falck-Zepeda, J.B., Traxler, G. and Nelson, R.G. (2000b). Surplus distribution from the introduction of a biotechnology innovation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82: 360-369.
10. Frisvold, G.B., Reeves, J.M. and Tronstad, R. (2006). Bt cotton adoption in the United States and China: International trade and welfare effects. AgBioForum, 9: 69-78.
11. Frisvold, G.B. and Tronstad, R. (2003). Economic effects of Bt cotton adoption and the impact of government programs. In: Kalaitzandonakes, N.G., (ed.), The Economic and Environmental Impacts of Agbiotech: A Global Perspective. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, pp. 261-286.
12. Gouse, M., Pray, C.E. and Schimmelpfennig, D.E. (2004). The distribution of benefits from Bt cotton adoption in South Africa. AgBioForum, 7: 187-94.
13. James, C. (2006). Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2006. ISAAA brief no.35, ISAAA, Ithaca, NY.
14. Moschini, G., Lapan, H.E. and Sobolevsky, A. (2000). Roundup Ready soybeans and welfare effects in the soybean complex. Agribusiness, 16: 33-55.
15. Phillips, P.W.B. (2003). The economic impact of herbicide tolerant canola in Canada. In: Kalaitzandonakes, N.G., (ed.), The Economic and Environmental Impacts of Agbiotech: A Global Perspective New York: Kluwer Academic Plenum Publishers, pp. 119-139.
16. Pray, C.E., Ma, D., Huang, J. and Qiao F. (2001). Impact of Bt cotton in China. World Development, 29: 813-25.
17. Price, G.K., Lin, W., Falck-Zepeda, J.B. and Fernandez-Cornejo, J. (2003). Size and distribution of market benefits from adopting biotech crops, Technical bulletin no. 1906, Economic Research Service, USDA, Washington.
18. Qaim, M. (2005). Agricultural biotechnology adoption in developing countries, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87: 1317-24.
19. Qaim, M. and Traxler, G. (2005). Roundup Ready soybeans in Argentina: Farm level and aggregate welfare effects. Agricultural Economics, 32: 73-86.
20. Thirtle, C., Beyers, L., Ismaël, Y. and Piesse, J. (2003). Can GM-technologies help the poor?The impact of Bt cotton in Makhathini Flats, KwaZulu-Natal. World Development, 31: 717-32.
21. Traxler, G., Godoy-Avila, S., Falck-Zepeda, J.B. and Espinoza-Arellano, J.D.J. (2003). Transgenic cotton in Mexico: A case study of the Comarca Lagunera. In: Kalaitzandonakes, N.G., (ed.), The Economic and Environmental Impacts of Agbiotech: A Global Perspective. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, pp. 183-202.
22. Yorobe, J.M. and Quicoy, C.B. (2006). Economic impact of Bt corn in the Philippines. The Philippine Agricultural Scientist, 89: 258-67.