Rent creation and distribution from biotechnology innovations: The case of bt cotton and Herbicide-Tolerant soybeans in 1997

Agribusiness

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 21-32

  Falck Zepeda, Jose B ^a   Traxler, Greg ^a   Nelson, Robert G ^a  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958012331     PISSN: 07424477     EISSN: 15206297     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6297(200024)16:1<21::AID-AGR3>3.0.CO;2-F     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Alston, J.M., Norton, G.W., & Pardey, P.G. (1995). Science under scarcity: Principles and practice for agricultural research evaluation and priority setting, Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.
2. Delta and Pine Land Company. (1997). 1997 Annual Report. Scott, MS: Delta and Pine Land Company.
3. Duffy, P.A., Wohlgenant, M.K., & Richardson, J.W. (1990). The elasticity of export demand for U.S. cotton. American Journal Agricultural Economics, 72(May), 468–74.
4. Hardee, D.D., & Herzog, G.A. 49th Annual conference report on cotton insect research and control. In. P. Dugger & D. Richter (Eds.), 1996 Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Conferences (p. 643), Memphis TN: National Cotton Council of America.
5. James, C. (1998). Global review of commercialized transgenic crops: 1998. ISAAA Briefs No. 8.
6. Kinnucan, H.W.& Miao, Y. (1999). Optimal generic advertising intensities for U.S. cotton in a free market. Unpublished paper, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Auburn University.
7. Monsanto. (1997a). 1997 Annual report form 10-K, St. Louis MO: Monsanto Corporation.
8. Monsanto. (1997b). Bollgard® Cotton update 1996. St. Louis MO: Monsanto Corporation
9. http:// www.monsanto.com/monsanto/mediacenter/background/97mar20―Bollgard.html.
10. Moschini, G.& Lapan, H. (1997). Intellectual property rights and the welfare effects on agricultural r&d. American Journal Agricultural Economics, 79(November),1229–1242.
11. Plexus Marketing Group, Inc. and Timber Mill Research, Inc. (1998). Enhanced market data cotton 1997/1998 report, Indianapolis, IN: Timber Mill Research, Inc.
12. Sullivan, J., Wainio, J., & Roningen, V. (1989). A database for trade liberalization studies, Washington DC: U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture and Trade Analysis Division.
13. Taylor, C.R. (1993). AGSIM: Model description and documentation. In C.R. Taylor, K.H. Reichelderfer, & S. R. Johnson (Eds.), Agricultural sector models for the united states, Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
14. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service. (1996). Cotton varieties planted, Washington, DC: Government Printing Office
15. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service. (1997). Cotton varieties planted. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
16. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service. (1998). Cotton varieties planted. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
17. US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. (1997a). Cotton and wool: Situation and outlook, Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
18. US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. (1997b). Agricultural Resource Management Study, Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
19. US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. (1998). International agricultural baseline projections to 2007. Market and Trade Economics Division, ERS-USDA Report No.767, Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
20. Williams, M.W. (1989). In J. Sullivan, J. Wainio, & V. Roningen (Eds.), A database for trade liberalization studies, Washington DC: US Department of Agriculture, Agriculture and Trade Analysis Division.
21. Williams, M.W. (1998). Cotton insect losses 1997. In P. Dugger & D. Richter (Eds.), 1998 Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Conferences (pp. 834–53), Memphis TN: National Cotton Council of America.
22. Zelinski, L.J., & Kerby, T. (1997). Comparison of NUCOTN33(B) to best adapted varieties throughout the U.S. cotton belt, Scott MS: Delta and Pine Land Company.