Fifty years after Enlow and Brown's Comparative histological study of fossil and recent bone tissues (1956-1958): A review of Professor Donald H. Enlow's contribution to palaeohistology and comparative histology of bone

Comptes Rendus - Palevol

Volumn 6, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 591-601

  de Ricqlès, Armand J ^a  

^a MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

Author keywords

Bone biology; Bone histology; Evolution; History of sciences; Palaeohistology

Indexed keywords

FOSSIL FUELS; HISTOLOGY; TISSUE;

BONE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FOSSIL; HISTOLOGY; ONTOGENY; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 37049025190     PISSN: 16310683     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.crpv.2007.09.010     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Amprino R. La structure du tissu osseux envisagée comme expression de différences dans la vitesse de l'acroissement. Arch. Biol. 58 (1947) 315-330
2. Amprino R., and Godina G. La struttura delle ossa nei vertebrati: ricerche comparative negli anfibi e negli amnioti. Comment. Pontif. Acad. Sci. 11 (1947) 329-464
3. Blomberg S.P., and Garland T.J. Tempo and mode in evolution: phylogenetic inertia, adaptation and comparative method. J. Evol. Biol. 15 (2002) 899-910
4. Carroll R.L. Patterns and processes of vertebrate evolution, Cambridge Paleobiol. Ser. (1997), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
5. Cubo J. Patterns and process in constructional morphology. Evol. Dev. 6 (2004) 131-133
6. Cubo J., Ponton F., Laurin M., de Margerie E., and Castanet J. Phylogenetic signal in bone microstructure of Sauropsids. Syst. Biol. 54 4 (2005) 562-574
7. Currey J.D. The many adaptations of bone. J. Biomech. 36 (2003) 1487-1495
8. Eldredge N., and Cracraft J. Phylogenetic patterns and the evolutionary processes (1980), Columbia University Press, NY, USA
9. D.H. Enlow, S.O. Brown, A comparative histological study of fossil and recent bone tissues. Part 1, Tex. J. Sci. 8 (1956) 405-443; part 2, ibid 9 (1957) 186-214; part 3, ibid 10 (1958) 187-230.
10. Enlow D.H. A study of post natal growth and remodeling of bone. Am. J. Anat. 110 2 (1962) 79-102
11. Enlow D.H. Functions of the Haversian systems. Am. J. Anat. 110 3 (1962) 269-306
12. Enlow D.H. Principles of bone remodelling (1963), Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL, USA
13. D.H. Enlow, An evaluation of the use of bone histology in forensic medicine and anthropology, in G. Evans (Ed.), Symposium on joints and bone, III Int. Congr. Anat., Springer, Berlin, 1966, pp. 92-112.
14. Enlow D.H. A morphogenetical analysis of facial growth. Am. J. Orthod. 52 4 (1966) 283-299
15. Enlow D.H. A comparative study of Facial growth in Homo and Macaca. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 24 3 (1966) 293-307
16. Enlow D.H. Wolff's law and the factor of architectonic circumstance. Am. J. Orthod. 54 11 (1968) 803-822
17. Enlow D.H. The bone of Reptiles. In: Gans C. (Ed). Biology of the Reptilia 1 (1969), Academic Press, London 45-80
18. Enlow D.H. Growth and the problem of the local control mechanism (Editorial). Am. J. Anat. 136 4 (1973) 403-405
19. Erickson G. Assessing dinosaur growth patterns: a microscopic revolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20 12 (2005) 677-684
20. J.S. Foote, A contribution to the comparative histology of the femur, Smiths. Contrib. Knowl., 1916, Publ No. 2382, Washington DC, USA.
21. Gayon J. Do biologists need the concept of function? A philosophical perspective. C. R. Palevol 5 3-4 (2006) 479-487
22. Germain D., and Laurin M. Microanatomy of the radius and lifestyle in amniotes (Vertebrata, Tetrapoda). Zool. Scripta 34 (2005) 335-350
23. Gould S.J. Ontogeny and phylogeny (1975), Belknap Press, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
24. Gould S.J. The structure of evolutionary theory (2002), Belknap Press, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
25. Gross W. Die Typen des mikroskopischen Knochenbaues bei fossilen Stegocephalen und Reptilien. Z. Anat. 103 (1934) 731-764
26. Haines W.R. The evolution of epiphyses and of endochondral bone. Biol. Rev. 17 (1942) 267-292
27. Harvey P.H., and Pagel M.D. The comparative method in evolutionary Biology (1991), Oxford University Press
28. Horner J.R., Padian K., and de Ricqlès A. How dinosaurs grew so large and so small. Sci. Am. 293 (2005) French version: Pour la Science 334 (2005) 82-88.
29. Janvier P. Early Vertebrates (1996), Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK
30. Kiprijanoff V. Studien über die fossilien Reptilien Russlands. Mem. Acad. Imp. Sci. St. Petersb., Ser. 7 (1881-1883) 28-31
31. Laurin M., Girondot M., and Loth M.-M. The evolution of long bone microanatomy and lifestyle in lissamphibians. Paleobiology 30 (2004) 589-613
32. de Margerie E. Laminar bone as an adaptation to torsional loads in flapping flight. J. Anat. 201 (2002) 521-526
33. de Margerie E., Robin J.-P., Verrier D., Cubo J., Groscolas R., and Castanet J. Assessing a relationship between bone microstructure and growth rate: a fluorescent labeling study in the King Pinguin chick (Aptenodytes patagonicus). J. Exp. Biol. 207 (2004) 869-879
34. de Margerie E., Sanchez S., Cubo J., and Castanet J. Torsional resistance as a principal component of the structural design of long bones: Comparative multivariate evidence in birds. Anat. Rec. 282 A (2005) 49-66
35. McGhee Jr. G.R. Theoretical morphology - The concept and its applications (1999), Columbia University Press, NY, USA
36. J. Matyas, Die mikroanatomische Knochenstruktur und die Abstammungsgeschichte eizelner Wierbeltieregruppen, in Xth Int. Zool. Congress, Budapest, 1929, pp. 666-704.
37. Mayr E. Cause and effect in Biology. Science 134 (1961) 1501-1506
38. Montes L., de Margerie E., Castanet J., de Ricqlès A., and Cubo J. Relationship between bone growth rate and the thickness of calcified cartilage in the long bones of Galloanserae (Aves). J. Anat. 206 (2005) 445-452
39. Nopcsa F., and Heidsieck E. Über eine pachyostotische Rippe aus der Kreide Rügens. Acta Zool. 15 (1934) 431-455
40. Queckett J. On the intimate structure of bone as composing the skeleton of the four great classes of vertebrates viz. Mammals, birds, reptiles and fish, with some remarks on the great value of such structures to assess affinities of minute fragments of organic remains Trans. R. Microsc. Soc. Lond. 2 (1849) 46-58
41. Reid R.E.H. Bone histology of the Cleveland-Lloyd dinosaurs, and of dinosaurs in general. Part 1: Introduction: introduction to bone tissues. Brigham Young Univ. Geol. Inst. Stud. 41 (1996) 25-71
42. de Ricqlès A. Recherches paléohistologiques sur les os longs des tétrapodes ; VII - Sur la classification, la signification fonctionnelle et l'histoire des tissus osseux de tétrapodes. Première partie: structures. Ann. Paleontol. 61 (1975) 51-129
43. de Ricqlès A. Recherches paléohistologiques sur les os longs des tétrapodes ; VII - Sur la classification, la signification fonctionnelle et l'histoire des tissus osseux de tétrapodes. Deuxième partie : fonctions. Ann. Paleontol. 62 1 (1976) 71-126 ibid 63 (1) (1977)33-56; ibid 63 (2) (1977) 133-160
44. de Ricqlès A. Recherches paléohistologiques sur les os longs des tétrapodes ; VII - Sur la classification, la signification fonctionnelle et l'histoire des tissus osseux de tétrapodes. Troisième partie : evolution. Ann. Paleontol. 64 1 (1978) 85-111 ibid 64 (2) (1978) 153-184
45. de Ricqlès A. Some remarks on paleohistology from a comparative-evolutionary point of view. In: Grupe G., and Garland A.N. (Eds). Histology of ancient human bone: Methods and diagnosis (1993), Springer Verlag, Berlin 37-77
46. de Ricqlès A., Meunier F.-J., Castanet J., and Francillon-Vieillot H. Comparative microstructure of bone. In: Hall B.K. (Ed). Bone. Vol. 3: Bone matrix and bone specific products (1991), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA 1-78
47. de Ricqlès A., Castanet J., and Francillon-Vieillot H. The 'message' of bone tissue in Paleoherpetology. Ital. J. Zool. (suppl. 1) (2004) 3-12
48. Seitz A.L. Vergleichenden Studien über den mikroskopischen Knochenbau fossiler und rezenter Reptilien. Nov. Acta Abh. Kaiser Leop-Carol. Deutsch Akad. Naturforsch. 37 (1907) 230-370
49. Stockstad E. Dinosaurs under the knife. Science 306 (2004) 962-965
50. Van der Meulen M.C.H., Beaupre G.S., and Carter D.R. Mechanobiological influences in long bone cross-sectional growth. Bone 14 (1993) 635-642
51. Van der Meulen M.C.H., and Carter D.R. Developmental mechanics determine long bone allometry. J. Theor Biol. 172 (1995) 323-327