Scale measurements as a conservation tool in endangered Zingel asper (Linnaeus, 1758)

Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems

Volumn 17, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 712-723

  Danancher, Delphine ^a   Labonne, J ^b   Gaudin, P ^b   Joly, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Conservation; Growth rate analysis; Longevity; Scale reading; Zingel asper

Indexed keywords

AGE DETERMINATION; ENDANGERED SPECIES; ENDEMIC SPECIES; GROWTH RATE; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; LONGEVITY; MARK-RECAPTURE METHOD; MEASUREMENT METHOD; PERCID; SAMPLING; SCALE READING; SPECIES CONSERVATION;

PERCIDAE; ZINGEL ASPER;

EID: 37049019648     PISSN: 10527613     EISSN: 10990755     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/aqc.810     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Akçakaya HR, Sjögren-Gulve P. 2000. Population viability analyses in conservation planning: an overview. Ecological Bulletin 48: 9-21.
2. Baglinière JL, Ombredane D. 1990. Choix et fiabilité d'un modèle de rétrocalcul des tailles en écologie halieutique. Mise au point d'un logiciel informatique. Bulletin Français de Pêche et de Pisciculture 319: 258-272.
3. Baglinière JL, Castanet J, Conand F, Meunier FJ. 1992. Tissus durs et âge individuel des vertébrés. Colloques et Séminaires ORSTOM-INRA, Paris.
4. Baras E, Malbrouk C, Houbart M, Kestemont P, Mélard C. 2000. The effect of PIT tags on growth and physiology of age-0 cultured Eurasian perch Perca fluviatilis of variable size. Aquaculture 185: 159-173.
5. Bernardo J. 1993. Determinants of maturation in animals. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 166-173.
6. Boutitie F. 1984. L'apron, poisson rare menacé de disparition (biologie repartition, habitat). University Claude Bernard, Lyon 1, Lyon.
7. Campana SE. 2001. Accuracy, precision and quality control in age determination, including a review of the use and abuse of age validation methods. Journal of Fish Biology 59: 197-242.
8. Caro T. 1998. Behavioral Ecology and Conservation Biology. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
9. Cavalli L, Pech N, Chappaz R. 2003. Diet and growth of the endangered Zingel asper in the Durance River. Journal of Fish Biology 63: 460-471.
10. Cazaubon A, Giudicelli J. 1999. Impact of the residual flow on the physical characteristics and benthic community (algae, invertebrates) of a regulated Mediterranean river: the Durance, France. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 15: 441-461.
11. Changeux T, Pont D. 1995. Current status of the riverine fishes of the French Mediterranean basin. Biological Conservation 72: 137-158.
12. Danancher D, Labonne J, Pradel R, Gaudin P. 2004. Capture-recapture estimates of space used in streams (CRESUS) at the population scale: case study on Zingel asper (percid), a threatened species of the Rhône catchment. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 61: 476-486.
13. Das Mahalpatra K, Gjerde B, Reddy PVG, Sahoo M, Jana RK, Saha JN, Rye M. 2001. Tagging: on the use of passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags for the identification of fish. Aquaculture Research 32: 47-50.
14. Economodis PS. 2002. Biology of rare and endangered non-migratory fish species: problems and constraints. In Conservation of Freshwater Fishes: Options for the Future, Collares-Pereira MJ, Coelho MM, Cowx IG (eds). Blackwell Science: Oxford; 81-89.
15. Fagan WF, Meir E, Prendergast J, Folarin A, Karieva P. 2001. Characterizing population vulnerability for 758 species. Ecology Letters 4: 132-138.
16. Gaudin P. 2000. Habitat shifts in juvenile riverine fishes. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 12: 1-16.
17. Holmgren K, Appelberg M. 2001. Effects of environmental factors on size-related growth efficiency of perch, Perca fluviatilis. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 10: 247-256.
18. Huet M. 1959. Profiles and biology of western European streams as related to fish management. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 88: 155-163.
19. Hutchings JA, Pickle A, McGregor-Shaw CR, Poirier L. 1999. Influence of sex, body size, and reproduction on overwinter lipid depletion in brook trout. Journal of Fish Biology 55: 1020-1028.
20. IUCN Red Data Book. 1996. IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals, Baillie J, Groombridge B (eds). IUCN: Gland, Switzerland.
21. Johnson JB, Omland KS. 2004. Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 101-108.
22. Kotiaho JS, Kaitala V, Komonen A, Païvinen J. 2005. Predicting the risk of extinction from shared ecological characteristics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102: 1963-1967.
23. Labonne J. 1998. Etude de la dynamique de populations d'un poisson patrimonial: l'apron du Rhône (Zingel asper). Premiers travaux de modélisation. Claude Bernard University, Lyon.
24. Labonne J. 2002. Contribution à la conservation de l'apron du Rhône (Zingel asper): dynamique des populations, sélection de l'habitat et modélisation. Unpublished thesis, University of Lyon-1: Villeurbanne.
25. Labonne J, Gaudin P. 2005. Exploring population dynamics patterns in a rare fish, Zingel asper, through capture-mark-recapture methods. Biological Conservation 19: 463-472.
26. Labonne J, Allouche S, Gaudin P. 2003. Use of generalised linear model to test habitat preferences: the example of Zingel asper, an endemic endangered percid of the Rhône river. Freshwater Biology 48: 687-697.
27. Laroche J, Durand JD. 2004. Genetic structure of fragmented populations of a threatened endemic percid of the Rhône river: Zingel asper. Heredity 92: 329-334.
28. Maitland PS. 1995. The conservation of freshwater fish: past and present experience. Biological Conservation 72: 259-270.
29. Malavoi JR, Souchon Y. 2002. Description standardisée des principaux faciès d'écoulement observables en rivière: clè de détermination qualitative et mesures physiques. Bulletin Français de Pêche et de Pisciculture 365/366: 357-372.
30. Mari S. 2001. Guide de gestion pour la conservation de l'apron du Rhône. Réserves naturelles de France, Life [available from http://www.apron.reserves-naturelles.org/Guide%20apron.pdf]
31. McCullagh P, Nelder JA. 1989. Generalized Linear Models. Chapman & Hall: London.
32. Moyo NAG, Fernando CH. 2000. Growth, mortality and reproduction of Sargochromis codringtonii in Lake Kariba, Zimbabwe. Hydrobiologia 438: 237-244.
33. Ombredane D, Baglinière JL, Marchand F. 1998. The effects of integrated transponder tags on survival and growth of juvenile brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) and their use for studying movement in small river. Hydrobiologia 371/372: 99-106.
34. Perret N, Joly P. 2002. Impacts of tattooing and PIT-tagging on survival and fecundity in the Alpine newt (Triturus alpestris). Herpetologica 58: 131-138.
35. Post JR, Parkinson EA. 2001. Energy allocation strategy in young fish: allometry and survival. Ecology 82: 1040-1051.
36. Purvis A, Gittleman JL, Cowlishaw G, Mace GM. 2000. Predicting extinction risk in declining species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 267: 1947-1952.
37. Schneider JC, Laarman PW, Gowing H. 2000. Age and growth methods and state averages. In Manual of Fisheries Survey Methods II: With Periodic Updates, Schneider JC (ed.). Chapter 9, Fisheries Special Report 25, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Ann Arbor.
38. Smale MA, Taylor WW. 1987. Sources of back-calculation error in estimating growth of lake whitefish. In Age and Growth of Fish, Summerfelt RC, Hall GE (eds). The Iowa State University Press: Ames, IA; 189-202.
39. Thedinga JF, Wertheimer AC, Heintz RA, Maselko JM, Rice SD. 2000. Effects of stock, coded-wire tagging, and transplant on straying of pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) in southeastern Alaska. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57: 2076-2085.
40. Venables WN, Ripley BD. 1994. Modern Applied Statistics with S-Plus. Statistics and Computing, Springer-Verlag: New York.
41. Webb JK, Brook BW, Shine R. 2002. What makes a species vulnerable to extinction? Comparative life-history traits of two sympatric snakes. Ecological Research 17: 59-67.
42. Wertheimer AC, Thedinga JF, Heintz RA, Bradshaw RF, Celewycz AG. 2002. Comparative effects of half-length coded wire tagging and ventral fin removal on survival and size of pink salmon fry. North American Journal of Aquaculture 64: 150-157.