Capture-recapture estimates of space used in streams (CRESUS) at the population scale: Case study on Zingel asper (percid), a threatened species of the Rhône catchment

Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 476-486

  Danancher, Delphine ^a   Labonne, Jacques ^a,b   Pradel, Roger ^c   Gaudin, Philippe ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

^c CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENDANGERED SPECIES; MARK-RECAPTURE METHOD; MOVEMENT; SPACE USE; STREAM;

ARDECHE; BEAUME RIVER; EURASIA; EUROPE; FRANCE; RHONE-ALPES; WESTERN EUROPE;

PERCIDAE; ZINGEL;

EID: 2642588422     PISSN: 0706652X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/f04-004     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Allouche, S. 2002. Nature and functions of cover for riverine fish. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic. 365/366: 297-324.
2. Anderson, D.J. 1982. The home range: a new non-parametric estimation technique. Ecology, 63: 103-112.
3. Anderson, D.R., Burnham, K.P., and White, G.C. 1994. AIC model selection in overdispersed capture-recapture data. Ecology, 75: 1780-1793.
4. Anderson, D.R., Link, W.A., Johnson, D.H., and Burnham, K.P. 2001. Suggestions for presenting the results of data analyses. J. Wildl. Manag. 65: 373-378.
5. Baras, E. 1992. Contribution à l'étude des stratégies d'occupation du temps et de l'espace chez un poisson téléostéen dulcicole, le barbeau fluviatile, Barbus barbus (L.). Étude par radiopistage, pêches électriques et observation directe. Ph.D. thesis, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
6. Baras, E., Malbrouk, C., Houbart, M., Kestemont, P., and Mélard, C. 2000. The effect of PIT tags on growth and physiology of age-0 cultured Eurasian perch Perca fluviatilis of variable size. Aquaculture, 185: 159-173.
7. Barton, N.H., Depaulis, F., and Etheridge, A.M. 2002. Neutral evolution in spatially continuous populations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 61: 31-18.
8. Bennetts, R.E., Nichols, J.D., Lebreton, J.D., Pradel, R., Hines, J.E., and Kitchens, W.M. 2001. Methods for estimating dispersal probabilities and related parameters using marked animals In Dispersal. Edited by J. Clobert, E. Danchin, A.A. Dhont, and J.D. Nichols. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. pp. 3-17.
9. Boitani, L., and Fuller, T. 2000. Research techniques in animal ecology: controversies and consequences. Columbia University Press, New York.
10. Brownie, C., Hines, J.E., Nichols, J.D., Pollock, K.H., and Hestbeck, J.B. 1993. Capture-recapture studies for multiple strata including non-Markovian transitions. Biometrics, 49: 1173-1187.
11. Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R., White, G.C., Brownie, C., and Pollock, K.P. 1987. Design and analysis of methods for fish survival experiments based on release-recapture. Am. Fish. Soc. Monogr. 5: 1-137.
12. Caro, T. 1999. The behaviour-conservation interface. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 366-369.
13. Choquet, R., Reboulet, A.-M., Pradel, R., and Lebreton, J.D. 2001. U-Care (Utilities-CApture-Recapture) user's guide. CEFE/ CNRS, Montpellier, France.
14. Clobert, J., and Pradel, R. 1993. Modélisation de quelques paramètres démographiques dans les populations animales suivies par capture, marquage et recapture: revue et perspectives. In Biométrie et environnement. Edited by J.D. Lebreton and B. Asselain. Masson, Paris, France. pp. 151-172.
15. Crespin, L. 1996. Sélection et dispersion dans la zone d'hybridation entre Barbus barbus et Barbus meridionalis (Cyprinidae): capture/recapture et marqueurs allozymiques. Ph.D. thesis, University of Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France.
16. Crisp, D.T. 1996. Environmental requirements of common riverine European salmonid fish species in fresh water with particular reference to physical and chemical aspects. Hydrobiologia, 323: 201-221.
17. Crosbie, S.F., and Manly, B.F.J. 1985. Parsimonious modelling of capture-mark-recapture studies. Biometrics, 41: 385-398.
18. Das Mahapatra, K., Gjerde, B., Reddy, P.V.G., Sahoo, M., Jana, R.K., and Rye, M. 2001. Tagging: on the use of passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags for the identification of fish. Aquacult. Res. 32: 47-50.
19. Fagan, W.F., Unmack, P.J., Burgess, C., and Minckley, W.L. 2002. Rarity, fragmentation, and extinction risk in desert fishes. Ecology, 83: 3250-3256.
20. Fausch, K.D., and Young, M.K. 1995. Evolutionnary significant units and movement of resident stream fishes: a cautionary tale. In Evolution and the aquatic ecosystem: defining unique units in population conservation. Edited by J. Nielsen. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 17: 360-370.
21. Fujiwara, M., and Caswell, H. 2002. Ageneral approach to temporary emigration in mark-recapture analysis. Ecology, 83: 3266-3275.
22. Gerking, S.D. 1953. Evidence for the concepts of home range and territory in stream fishes. Ecology, 34: 347-365.
23. Gerking, S.D. 1959. The restricted movements of fish populations. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 34: 221-242.
24. Gowan, C., Young, M.K., Fausch, K.D., and Riley, S.C. 1994. Restricted movements in resident stream salmonids: a paradigm lost? Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 51: 2626-2637.
25. Huet, M. 1959. Profiles and biology of western European streams as related to fish management. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 88: 155-163.
26. Kendall, W., and Nichols, J.D. 2002. Estimating state-transition probabilities for unobservable states using capture-recapture/resighting data. Ecology, 83: 3276-3284.
27. Kenward, R. 1987. Wildlife radio tagging: equipment, field techniques and data analysis. Academic Press, Orlando, Fla.
28. Kocik, J.F., and Ferreri, P. 1998. Juvenile production variation in salmonids: population dynamics, habitat, and the role of spatial relationships. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55: 191-200.
29. Labonne, J. 2002. Contribution à la conservation de l'apron du Rhône (Zingel asper): dynamique des populations, sélection de l'habitat et modélisation. Ph.D. thesis, University of Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France.
30. Labonne, J., Allouche, S., and Gaudin, P. 2003. Use of generalized linear model to test habitat preferences: the example of Zingel asper, an endemic endangered percid of the Rhône River. Freshwater Biol. 48: 687-697.
31. Lebreton, J.D., Burnham, K.P., Clobert, J., and Anderson, D.R. 1992. Modelling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies. Ecol. Monogr. 62: 67-117.
32. Lucas, M.C., and Baras, E. 2000. Methods for studying spatial behaviour of freshwater fishes in the natural environment. Fish Fish. 1: 283-316.
33. Malavoi, J.R. 1989. Typologie des faciès d'écoulement ou unités morphodynamiques des cours d'eau à haute énergie. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic. 15: 189-210.
34. Mari, S. 2001. Guide de gestion pour la conservation de l'apron du Rhône. Réserves naturelles de France, Life [available from http://www.apron.reserves-naturelles.org/Guide%20apron.pdf].
35. McNamara, J.M., Houston, A.I., and Collins, E.J. 2001. Optimality models in behavioral biology. Siam Rev. 43: 413-466.
36. Menu, F., Roebuck, J.P., and Viala, M. 2000. Bet-hedging diapause strategies in stochastic environments. Am. Nat. 155: 724-734.
37. Ombredane, D., Bagliniere, J.L., and Marchand, F. 1998. The effects of passive integrated transponder tags on survival and growth of juvenile brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) and their use for studying movements in a small river. Hydrobiologia, 372: 99-106.
38. Ovidio, M. 1999. Cycle annuel d'activité de la truite commune (Salmo trutta L.) adulte: étude par radio pistage dans un cours d'eau de l'ardenne belge. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic. 352: 1-18.
39. Ovidio, M., Philippart, J.L., and Baras, E. 2000. Methodological bias in home range and mobility estimates when locating radio-tagged trout, Salmo trutta, at different time intervals. Aquat. Living Resour. 13: 449-454.
40. Pollock, K.H. 1981. Capture-recapture models for age-dependent survival and capture rates. Biometrics, 37: 521-529.
41. Pollock, K.H., Hines, J.E., and Nichols, J.D. 1985. Goodness-of-fit tests for open capture-recapture models. Biometrics, 41: 399-410.
42. Pradel, R. 1996. Utilization of capture-mark-recapture for the study of recruitment and population growth rate. Biometrics, 52: 703-709.
43. Pradel, R., Hines, J.E., Lebreton, J.D., and Nichols, J.D. 1997. Capture-recapture survival models taking account of transients. Biometrics, 53: 60-72.
44. Reboulet, A.M., Viallefont, A., Pradel, R., and Lebreton, J.D. 1999. Selection of survival and recruitment models with Surge 5.0. Bird Study, 46: 148-156.
45. Reboulet, A.M., Lebreton, J.D., Frederiksen, M., Pradel, R., and Viallefont, A. 2000. Analysis of capture-recapture data. The estimation of population parameters from data on marked animals. Case studies: I. Directives for analyses, II. Comments and results, using MARK, U-CARE and SODA. Word document. Montpellier, France [available from ftp.cefe.cnrs-mop.fr/pub/biom/ Soft-CR].
46. Schaub, M., Pradel, R., Jenni, L., and Lebreton, J.D. 2001. Migrating animals stop over longer than usually thought: an improved capture-recapture analysis. Ecology, 82: 852-859.
47. Sempeski, P., and Gaudin, P. 1995. Habitat selection by grayling - I. Spawning habitats. J. Fish Biol. 47: 256-265.
48. Smithson, E.B. 1999. Movement patterns of stream fishes in a Ouachita Highlands stream: an examination of the restricted movement paradigm. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 128: 847-853.
49. White, G., and Burnham, K.P. 1999. Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study, 46: 120-139.
50. White, G.C., and Garrott, R.A. 1990. Analysis of wildlife radiotracking data. Academic Press, London, England.