Current state of dynamic imaging in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

Journal of Endovascular Therapy

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 807-812

  Laskowski, Igor ^a   Verhagen, Hence J M ^b   Gagne, Paul J ^a   Moll, Frans L ^c   Muhs, Bart E ^d  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^d YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Aortic motion; Branched stent graft; Dynamic computed tomography; Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging; Endograft; Fenestrated stent graft; Intravascular ultrasound; Stent graft

Indexed keywords

ANEURYSM SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SECOND LOOK SURGERY;

AORTIC ANEURYSM; AORTOGRAPHY; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; PATIENT SELECTION; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STENTS; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER;

EID: 37049002241     PISSN: 15266028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1583/07-2116.1     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Bonte G, Marcq F. Multiple roentgenograms in aortography and arteriography [in French]. J Radiol Electrol Arch Electr Medicale. 1950;31:456.
2. Parodi JC, Palmaz JC, Barone HD. Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 1991;5:491-499.
3. Rubin GD, Shiau MD, Leung AN, et al. Aorta and iliac arteries: single versus multiple detector-row helical CT angiography. Radiology. 2000;215:670-676.
4. Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Stanley JC, et al. Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. Radiology. 1995;197:785-792.
5. Durham JR, Hackworth CA, Tober JC, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography in the preoperative evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Am J Surg. 1993;166:173-178.
6. Prinssen M, Verhoeven EL, Buth J, et al. A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1607-1618.
7. Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Kwong GP, et al. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364:843-848.
8. EVAR trial participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365:2179-2186.
9. Blankensteijn JD, de Jong SE, Prinssen M, et al. Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2398-2405.
10. Prince MR. Gadolinium-enhanced MR aortography. Radiology. 1994;191:155-164.
11. Krinsky G, Rofsky N, Flyer M, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of acquired arch vessel disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167:981-987.
12. Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Jacoby WT, et al. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the thoracic aorta. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166:1387-1397.
13. Kaufman JA, Geller SC, Petersen MJ, et al. MR imaging (including MR angiography) of abdominal aortic aneurysms: comparison with conventional angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163:203-210.
14. Sechtem U, Pflugfelder P, Higgins CB. Quantification of cardiac function by conventional and cine magnetic resonance imaging. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1987;10:365-373.
15. Marcus JT, Vonk Noordegraaf A, de Vries PM, et al. MRI evaluation of right ventricular pressure overload in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1998;8:999-1005.
16. Marcus JT, Gotte MJ, DeWaal LK, et al. The influence of through-plane motion on left ventricular volumes measured by magnetic resonance imaging: implications for image acquisition and analysis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 1999;1:1-6.
17. Ho VB, Foo TK. Impact of "cine MR imaging: potential for the evaluation of cardiovascular function." AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:605-608.
18. Vos AW, Wisselink W, Marcus JT, et al. Aortic aneurysm pulsatile wall motion imaged by cine MRI: a tool to evaluate efficacy of endovascular aneurysm repair? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002;23:158-161.
19. van Herwaarden JA, Bartels LW, Muhs BE, et al. Dynamic magnetic resonance angiography of the aneurysm neck: conformational changes during the cardiac cycle with possible consequences for endograft sizing and future design. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:22-28.
20. Faries PL, Agarwal G, Lookstein R, et al. Use of cine magnetic resonance angiography in quantifying aneurysm pulsatility associated with endoleak. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:652-656.
21. van Herwaarden JA, Muhs BE, Vincken KL, et al. Aortic compliance following EVAR and the influence of different endografts: determination using dynamic MRA. J Endovasc Ther. 2006;13:406-414.
22. Goldberg BB, Lehman JS. Aortosonography: ultrasound measurement of the abdominal and thoracic aorta. Arch Surg. 1970;100:652-655.
23. Wheeler WE, Beachley MC, Ranniger K. Angiography and ultrasonography. A comparative study of abdominal aortic aneurysms. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1976;126:95-100.
24. Sonesson B, Hansen F, Stale H, et al. Compliance and diameter in the human abdominal aorta - the influence of age and sex. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1993;7:690-697.
25. Lanne T, Sandgren T, Mangell P, et al. Improved reliability of ultrasonic surveillance of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1997;13:149-153.
26. Malina M, Länne T, Ivancev K, et al. Reduced pulsatile wall motion of abdominal aortic aneurysms after endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg. 1998;27:624-631.
27. Broeders IA, Blankensteijn JD, Olree M, et al. Preoperative sizing of grafts for transfemoral endovascular aneurysm management: a prospective comparative study of spiral CT angiography, arteriography, and conventional CT imaging. J Endovasc Surg. 1997;4:252-261.
28. Parker MV, O'Donnell SD, Chang AS, et al. What imaging studies are necessary for abdominal aortic endograft sizing? A prospective blinded study using conventional computed tomography, aortography, and three-dimensional computed tomography. J Vasc Surg. 2005;41:199-205.
29. Kalender WA, Seissler W, Klotz E, et al. Spiral volumetric CT with single-breath-hold technique, continuous transport, and continuous scanner rotation. Radiology. 1990;176:181-183.
30. Klingenbeck-Regn K, Schaller S, Flohr T, et al. Subsecond multi-slice computed tomography: basics and applications. Eur J Radiol. 1999;31:110-124.
31. Muhs BE, Verhoeven EL, Zeebregts CJ, et al. Mid-term results of endovascular aneurysm repair with branched and fenestrated endografts. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:9-15.
32. Draney MT, Zarins CK, Taylor CA. Three-dimensional analysis of renal artery bending motion during respiration. J Endovasc Ther. 2005;12:380-386.
33. Kaandorp DW, Vasbinder GB, de Haan MW, et al. Motion of the proximal renal artery during the cardiac cycle. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;12:924-928.
34. Vasbinder GB, Maki JH, Nijenhuis RJ, et al. Motion of the distal renal artery during three-dimensional contrast-enhanced breath-hold MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;16:685-696.
35. Teutelink A, Rutten A, Muhs BE, et al. Pilot study of dynamic cine CT angiography for the evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysms: implications for endograft treatment. J Endovasc Ther. 2006;13:139-144.
36. Muhs BE, Vincken KL, van Prehn J, et al. Dynamic cine-CT angiography for the evaluation of the thoracic aorta; insight in dynamic changes with implications for thoracic endograft treatment. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006;32:532-536.
37. Muhs BE, Teutelink A, Prokop M, et al. Endovascular aneurysm repair alters renal artery movement: a preliminary evaluation using dynamic CTA. J Endovasc Ther. 2006;13:476-480.